Re: [Sieve] Unable to fileinto subfolders

2015-07-16 Thread James Lott
rted" in your maildir, the dirctory > probably exists as "INBOX" with a subdirectory "Sorted" inside. > > Changeing the fileinto in the sieve script to "INBOX/Sorted" ahould sort > things out. > > > regards > - christian -- James Lott -- James Lott

Re: Quota policy service not rejecting messages when user over quota

2015-07-16 Thread James Lott
ess" >quota_status_nouser = "551 User not found" >quota_status_overquota = "552 5.2.2 Recipient mailbox is full" > } > service quota-status { >executable = quota-status -p postfix >unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/policy-quota { > user = postfix > group = wheel > mode = 0666 >} > } -- James Lott

[Dovecot Antispam] Can't seem to load plugin

2015-07-18 Thread James Lott
09:41 /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib90_antispam_plugin.so I am unable to make any sense of this. Thanks in advance for any pointers :) -- James Lott# 2.2.18: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.8 (0c4ae064f307+) # OS: FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 amd64 lda_mailbox_autocreate

Re: [Dovecot Antispam] Can't seem to load plugin

2015-07-19 Thread James Lott
paths incorrectly. I'll have to keep beating my head against it and see where it takes me. On Sunday, July 19, 2015 22:16:25 Steffen wrote: > James Lott wrote: > > There is no sign on the plugin even attempting to load. No log > > entries, no errors, nothing. The plugin i

Re: [Dovecot Antispam] Can't seem to load plugin

2015-07-20 Thread James Lott
ash = Trash >antispam_unsure = INBOX/Suspect > > i don't know crm114 but this looks ok to me. > > you could try > > antispam_verbose_debug = 1 > > to get more verbose logging from the antispam plugin > > regards > - christian -- James Lott

Re: dovecot proxy/director and high availability design

2015-07-21 Thread James Lott
I think RR DNS is the only viable solution under these circumstances. If you can cope with the fact that failovers won't be seamless, I don't think there's anything wrong with that though. On 07/21/2015 11:54 AM, Laz C. Peterson wrote: The consensus seems to say no to RR DNS … I am going to ta

Re: dovecot proxy/director and high availability design

2015-07-21 Thread James Lott
Right.. I stand corrected On 07/21/2015 12:37 PM, Marcus Rueckert wrote: On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:00:39 -0700 James Lott wrote: I think RR DNS is the only viable solution under these circumstances. If you can cope with the fact that failovers won't be seamless, I don't think there&

Re: dovecot quota service for postfix

2015-09-29 Thread James Lott
Incase user is underquota, then the email is returned back to postfix for processing and delivering email to user mbox, incase user has no sufficient quota then dovecot will inform postfix to reject email. Please confirm if what i mentioned above is correct and that i understand correctly how dov