Hi,
> Nov 22 18:48:15 seba deliver(jh): file maildir-uidlist.c: line 844
> (maildir_uidlist_set_ext): assertion failed: (rec != NULL)
> Nov 22 18:48:15 seba deliver(jh): Raw backtrace:
> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver(i_syslog_fatal_handler+0x2b) [0x80be37b]
> -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/
Quoting Evaggelos Balaskas:
I use the same command ( via cron ) but my maildir folder with spam is
more than 50.000 emails !!! so ...
Don't run sa-learn over the same messages again, it will give you
nothing (sa-learn will ignore it), but it will take a lot of time
anyways. Simply move the m
Daniel Black wrote:
having trouble compiling dovecot-1.1hg latest pull
dito.
ST_MTIME_NSEC is ((unsigned long)(st).st_mtim.tv_nsec) (at least on my
system), but st in maildir-uidlist.c:322 is a pointer, so -> has to be used.
Here's a (quick'n'dirty, probably incomplete) patch:
diff -r 6ab
David Cunningham wrote:
I have about 5 Thousand users using horde that login ever 1-5 minutes to
refresh their page. I assume it is a setting, but I am confused as to
This may not related to the real reason of your problem, but I recommend
up-imapproxy (http://www.imapproxy.org/) for such
Timo Sirainen wrote:
But I'm not sure if I should convert the following TAB to a space.
UW-IMAP seems to do that, but RFC just says that the CRLF should be
dropped.
As pointed out in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=240924#c7, this could lead
to strange behaviour. So I'd vote for
Timo Sirainen wrote:
lead to strange behaviour. So I'd vote for replacing the folding tab
to a space.
Actually Dovecot already replaces all tabs to spaces when sending
ENVELOPE, BODY and BODYSTRUCTURE replies. The only issue here is about
the internal parsing where I think it's better to be st
Thomas Hummel wrote:
I was asking what was the motivation for not having the envelope From in the
Maildir format, as defined in the qmail spec :
"The message is delivered without an extra UUCP-
style From_ line, without any >From quoting, and without an
extra blank line at the end."
which ma
Timo Sirainen wrote:
deliver is the binary name. but it's configured inside protocol lda {}
section. This is getting annoying, any thoughts on what would be a good
unifying name?
I hope you didn't intend such a bikeshed discussion :)
c) dovecot-lda binary, protocol lda {}
This is perfectly
Seth Mattinen, 2009-05-15 09:39:
(right?) and so can dovecot, so should i use dovecot's "deliver"
mechanism, or exim's own internal mechanism?
Only dovecot 'deliver' will update the index on delivery.
That's obvious. But dovecot (AFAIK) updates (not rebuilds) indexes when
it sees new message
Stan Hoeppner, 2010-03-16 08:45:
> Regarding memory usage, on Linux anyway, you should really read this Timo.
> It would be mutually beneficial to Dovecot (and Postfix, and etc). I've not
> played with it yet, and I don't have a busy server to test it on, but I'm
> betting it would seriously bene
Stan Hoeppner, 2010-03-16 10:50:
>> AFAIK, KSM is primarily useful for vservers (xen, kvm etc.) running the
>> same software. How would running a single instance of dovecot (or any
>> other daemon) profit by that? AFAICS, "generates many instances of the
>> same data" does not apply to dovecot (or
Marcio Merlone, 2009-06-17 16:21:
Sorry if this is off-topic. Do you guys know any user friendly sieve
extension for Thunderbird? I saw http:\\sieve.mozdev.org but it not user
friendly
By "user friendly", you probably mean an interface like that for TB's
internal filters. It seems that no
Charles Marcus, 2009-11-10 12:52:
> Sam Varshavik (courier-imap developer) claims (on the courier-imap list,
> see attached) dovecot is incorrectly parsing messages with
> missing/invalid "MIME-Version:" header...
Since when is being robust incorrect?
>> However this situation does appear to be
Davy Leon, 2009-12-08 16:53:
> Thanks for the reply. Definitelly IMAP is not a solution for me. All the
> emails for my user's domain are stored in a single account on my ISP. I
> have to fetch them and distribute them locally. In every fetch there are
> several emails and every time the link fail
On 29.12.2009 21:10, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> What does this information mean and how is it relevant?
>> I cannot find documentation other than a brief description in dovecot.conf:
>>
>> %t - number of TOP commands
>> %p - number of bytes sent to client as a result of TOP command
> POP3's TOP comma
Timo Sirainen, 2010-01-25 20:29:
>>> b) Get some async DNS library from somewhere.
>> I have been looking for that as well recenly, and I stumbled upon the
>> unbound library, part of the unbound project.
> I know there are a few of them, but I'd prefer to use the system's own
> resolver. A few re
forum, 30.04.2013 16:55:
> Now i have found the solution.
> It seems to help to ask you. ;)
>
> The solution was to change from
> listen = [::]
> to
> listen = *, [::]
>
> There is no explanation for it - just try and error ...
This is not dovecot's fault. See here: http://serverfault.com/a/395
Quoting Odhiambo WASHINGTON:
> We have something like that with tpop3d (Chris Lightfoot's). tpop3d is
> nolonger maintained but it's rock solid as a POP3 daemon. It gives this
> feature via some perl hooks (plugin, I'd call it, for lack of the proper
> word atm) and works very well.
> It serves t
Hi,
> I'll release v1.0.1 in a day or two, but it would be nice to get some
> testing before the release to see if I managed to break something after
> the Mercurial conversion. And did I forget something that should be
> fixed for v1.0.1?
>
> http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.0.1rc2.tar.gz
nice.
Quoting Timo Sirainen:
> http://dovecot.org/tmp/concurrency.c
>
> I'd want to know what results this program gives with different systems.
> Please test and reply (but don't bother if someone already replied with
> the same OS+result). I expect it to print:
Dual Pentium III 1133MHz: one "page si
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Pigeons used to carry mail and live in dovecots, so Dovecot is the house
> for email :)
Not that it matters much, but isn't it spelled "dovecotE"?
Quoting Timo Sirainen:
> Please try and report any bugs. Beta2 still had a few bad bugs, but I'm
> hoping this release is near a usable state.
I have the current revision from hg running and get this occasionally
(already happened with beta2 revisions, I only never got around to
report it):
> Oc
Hi,
running the current version from http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/ (but the
same happens with 1.1.beta3)
After yesterday's patches, squirrelmail (tested with 1.4.11 and 1.4.10a)
complains when appending to the Sent folder (after sending a message):
ERROR: Connection dropped by IMAP server.
Query
Hi,
I get a lot of these after updating to the current 1.1 hg version:
> Nov 6 16:05:35 seba deliver(jh): file mail-cache-transaction.c: line 736
> (mail_cache_header_add_field): assertion failed:
> (cache->field_file_map[field_idx] != (uint32_t)-1)
> Nov 6 16:05:35 seba deliver(jh): Raw back
24 matches
Mail list logo
