sieve-filter with duplicate-extension

2016-08-26 Thread hendrik
Hi, i have imported a mailbox twice (accentially). Now i thought, it might be a valid approach to simply use a custom sieve rule to mark duplicates using the attached ruleset I ran sieve-filter like this: ~# sieve-filter -e -W -v -C -u user...@example.com /var/vmail/example.com/userxyz/

[Dovecot] dovecot died

2012-10-16 Thread Hendrik
Hi All I have been trying to get this website running for months now. I get this emails from cpanel and don't know how to fix it. If anyone can help me please contact me at pipe...@mweb.co.za. Kind regards Hendrik imap failed @ Fri Oct 12 05:51:18 2012. A restart was attempted automagi

[Dovecot] Unsuscribe

2012-11-19 Thread Hendrik
Please unsubscribe me

Re: Authenticate users using their firstname

2018-10-01 Thread Hendrik Boom
name.lastn...@domain.com> but > >>> authenticate users using their first name. I really hit a wall here and > >>> any help will be much appreciated. > >> > >> Well, for me, this sounds strange, using firstname only. Why not let your > >> users enter the firstname only? Or: > >> > >> pass_filter = (&(objectclass=inetOrgPerson)(|(uid=%n)(mail=%n@*))) > >> > >> If firstname is unique, mail should be unique as well. > >> > >> - -- > >> Steffen Kaiser > > > > > > Steffen, I understood their mail addresses are like > > steffen.kai...@domain.com, but uid's are like uid=steffen > > > > Aki > > I guess this seems to be the desired behaviour as well. Getting interesting > when handling collisions. Not possible to decide by password which account > should be used as far as i can tell, as this would be some sort of brute > force authentication?!? Not when a lot of people choose 123456 as their passwords. -- hendrik > > -M

Re: Mailing list address harvested for spamming

2018-12-01 Thread Hendrik Boom
shouldn't be sent to the obvious sending address, but to another address. This is essential if, say, the sender is temporarily away from home and s using a friend's email service. It is unfortunate that there are user-agents that do not provide the reply-to-list' option. And that ther

Re: Mailing list address harvested for spamming

2018-12-02 Thread Hendrik Boom
it properly, with the appropriate software set. Especially in the > area of technical mailing lists I see no reason to cater to dumb MUA > software. Especially in a technical mailing list about email software! -- hendrik

Re: RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support

2020-08-21 Thread Hendrik Boom
packages have tcpwrap support for el7: So is el8 truly incompatible with tcpwrap? Or is it just too much effort to continue suport for every feature that was ever in the system? If the former, might it be reasonable for a user to change the 8's in the code below to 9's? -- hendrik &

Re: Version controlled (git) Maildir generated by Dovecot

2020-10-07 Thread Hendrik Boom
gt; The same exists in lowriter (and very probably in all > others - I didn't use them up to now). In LibreOffice you can save a text document as .fodt , where you can see all the xml. It does not contain line breaks, so merging with most revision control systems won't be useful. -- hendrik

Re: Solr - complete setup (update)

2019-01-26 Thread Hendrik Boom
gt; (see below) > > Debian does something weird here. It doesn't use an explicit systemd unit. > It is generated from the SysV init file. I ended up setting the ulimits in > /etc/security/limits.conf for user solr. Please make sure the changes you make don't make your Debian package *require* systemd. There are Debian-derived distros that avoid systemd. -- hendrik

Re: Headsup on feature removal - password

2020-03-18 Thread Hendrik Boom
Was there any reason for this message to be HTML-only? On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 07:13:12AM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18/03/2020 00:06 Rupert Gallagher wrote: > > > > > > > >> Password

Re: Headsup on feature removal - password

2020-03-18 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 10:38:37AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 09:51:51 -0400, Hendrik Boom stated: > >Was there any reason for this message to be HTML-only? > > Was there any reason to 'top post' and include the HTML text? Yes. (1) To indicate that my que

Re: What causes mails to get striked-over only, and not deleted?

2020-05-22 Thread Hendrik Boom
probably so that if you made a mistake you can undelete them again. -- hendrik > > (have tried with _before too, but it wont help). > > What can I do to ensure the mail actually gets deleted (completely, not > moved to trash) and not just flagged for deletion? >

Re: How to use dovecot only as POP3 server / prevent it from creating .imap directories?

2020-06-07 Thread Hendrik Boom
es or IMAP related files? I suppose you'd be OK with having IMAP but having it look *only* at the designated mbox file. That would be something I could use. -- hendrik > > This happens with dovecot 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4) on Debian buster (with all > updates applied). > >

Re: SV: handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Hendrik Boom
Of course you can still whitelist, and this spamfighting won't happen for those sites. -- hendrik > Also blocklists > Also consider setting up rules in spamassassin / rspamd >

Re: handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Hendrik Boom
o recipient. If you do this rgularly enough, sending these messages to what are likely forged return addresses, you might just end up being classified as a spam sender yourself. -- hendrik > > > > >

[no subject]

2016-04-03 Thread Hendrik Velloen
n't lookup pop3-uidl for UID=1: POP3 UIDLs couldn't be synce -- Kind Regards Hendrik

Migrating from Olde server to Dovecot

2016-04-03 Thread Hendrik Velloen
ookup pop3-uidl for UID=1: POP3 UIDLs couldn't be synce -- Kind Regards Hendrik

[Dovecot] Feature request: 'dovecot-shared' files to be configurable

2009-09-24 Thread Hendrik Pahl
cot config, something like "always keep a 'dovecot-shared' file in users maildir, even if that mailbox is not shared"? That would be nice, since creating that files by hand is really time-consuming. Or are there any relations which avoid making this issue configurabl

Re: [Dovecot] Compile dovecot 1.2.5 with managesieve patch 0.11.9?

2009-10-01 Thread Hendrik Pahl
Hi Seba, > is it possible to compile dovecot 1.2.5 with the managesieve patch > 0.11.9 just tested this combination few days ago. works fine for me, but i haven't tested all the small thing yet. maybe there are minor issues, but it generally works. hendrik -- LWsystems Gm

[Dovecot] listing available subscriptions - shared mailboxes

2009-10-27 Thread Hendrik Pahl
t letter of the name, 'folde' for example. strange behaviour, since this happens with any client. i hope somebody know what is wrong here. thanks in advance, hendrik -- LWsystems GmbH & Co. KG ++ http://www.lw-systems.de/impressum Tel: +49 (0)5403 / 5556 ++ Fax: +49 (0)5403 / 7

Re: [Dovecot] listing available subscriptions - shared mailboxes

2009-10-28 Thread Hendrik Pahl
; "shared/edvINBOX" reduced output to where the magic happens. two appereances which are totally senseless to me. lsub: * LSUB () "/" "shared/edvINBOX" * LSUB () "/" "shared/edv" also reduced. hth, hendrik -- LWsystems GmbH & Co.

Re: [Dovecot] CentOS 5 ... again

2009-02-12 Thread Jan-Hendrik Zab
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:02:23 +0100 Angel Marin wrote: > Scott Silva wrote: > > on 2-9-2009 8:07 PM Linux Advocate spake the following: > >> guys , i m new to centos. i have learned to use yum and the > >> priority plugin. Does the atrpm repo provide the most up to date > >> version of dovecot? i

Re: v2.2.27 Panic: file rfc822-parser.h: line 23 (rfc822_parser_deinit): assertion failed: (ctx->data <= ctx->end)

2019-03-28 Thread Hendrik Boom via dovecot
-- what deb line did you use in /etc/apt/sources.lst to refer to the archived repositories? -- hendrik

Re: maildir very dirty sync option

2019-08-20 Thread Hendrik Boom via dovecot
e future problems . What's the scale of this problem? I.e., how large are the troublesome "large mailboxes"? A gigabyte? A terabyte? a few megabytes? -- hendrik

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only,> case-sensitive?

2019-09-11 Thread Hendrik Boom via dovecot
ystem in which the local Part ist Case sensitive! Isn't the user name in the original Unix mail system (and presumably most of its descentants) case sensitive? In which case it has to distinguish between mail sent to bob and to Bob? - hendrik