Hi,
i have imported a mailbox twice (accentially). Now i thought, it might
be a valid approach to simply use a custom sieve rule to mark duplicates
using the attached ruleset
I ran sieve-filter like this:
~# sieve-filter -e -W -v -C -u user...@example.com
/var/vmail/example.com/userxyz/
Hi All
I have been trying to get this website running for months now. I get this
emails from cpanel and don't know how to fix it. If anyone can help me
please contact me at pipe...@mweb.co.za.
Kind regards
Hendrik
imap failed @ Fri Oct 12 05:51:18 2012. A restart was attempted
automagi
Please unsubscribe me
name.lastn...@domain.com> but
> >>> authenticate users using their first name. I really hit a wall here and
> >>> any help will be much appreciated.
> >>
> >> Well, for me, this sounds strange, using firstname only. Why not let your
> >> users enter the firstname only? Or:
> >>
> >> pass_filter = (&(objectclass=inetOrgPerson)(|(uid=%n)(mail=%n@*)))
> >>
> >> If firstname is unique, mail should be unique as well.
> >>
> >> - --
> >> Steffen Kaiser
> >
> >
> > Steffen, I understood their mail addresses are like
> > steffen.kai...@domain.com, but uid's are like uid=steffen
> >
> > Aki
>
> I guess this seems to be the desired behaviour as well. Getting interesting
> when handling collisions. Not possible to decide by password which account
> should be used as far as i can tell, as this would be some sort of brute
> force authentication?!?
Not when a lot of people choose 123456 as their passwords.
-- hendrik
>
> -M
shouldn't
be sent to the obvious sending address, but to another address.
This is essential if, say, the sender is temporarily away from home and s using
a friend's email service.
It is unfortunate that there are user-agents that do not provide the
reply-to-list' option. And that ther
it properly, with the appropriate software set. Especially in the
> area of technical mailing lists I see no reason to cater to dumb MUA
> software.
Especially in a technical mailing list about email software!
-- hendrik
packages have tcpwrap support for el7:
So is el8 truly incompatible with tcpwrap? Or is it just too much
effort to continue suport for every feature that was ever in the system?
If the former, might it be reasonable for a user to change the 8's in
the code below to 9's?
-- hendrik
&
gt; The same exists in lowriter (and very probably in all
> others - I didn't use them up to now).
In LibreOffice you can save a text document as .fodt , where you
can see all the xml. It does not contain line breaks, so merging
with most revision control systems won't be useful.
-- hendrik
gt; (see below)
>
> Debian does something weird here. It doesn't use an explicit systemd unit.
> It is generated from the SysV init file. I ended up setting the ulimits in
> /etc/security/limits.conf for user solr.
Please make sure the changes you make don't make your Debian package
*require* systemd. There are Debian-derived distros that avoid systemd.
-- hendrik
Was there any reason for this message to be HTML-only?
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 07:13:12AM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 18/03/2020 00:06 Rupert Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Password
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 10:38:37AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 09:51:51 -0400, Hendrik Boom stated:
> >Was there any reason for this message to be HTML-only?
>
> Was there any reason to 'top post' and include the HTML text?
Yes.
(1) To indicate that my que
probably so that if you made
a mistake you can undelete them again.
-- hendrik
>
> (have tried with _before too, but it wont help).
>
> What can I do to ensure the mail actually gets deleted (completely, not
> moved to trash) and not just flagged for deletion?
>
es or IMAP related files?
I suppose you'd be OK with having IMAP but having it look *only* at the
designated mbox file.
That would be something I could use.
-- hendrik
>
> This happens with dovecot 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4) on Debian buster (with all
> updates applied).
>
>
Of course you can still whitelist, and this spamfighting won't happen
for those sites.
-- hendrik
> Also blocklists
> Also consider setting up rules in spamassassin / rspamd
>
o recipient.
If you do this rgularly enough, sending these messages to what are
likely forged return addresses, you might just end up being classified
as a spam sender yourself.
-- hendrik
>
>
>
>
>
n't
lookup pop3-uidl for UID=1: POP3 UIDLs couldn't be synce
--
Kind Regards
Hendrik
ookup pop3-uidl for UID=1: POP3 UIDLs couldn't be synce
--
Kind Regards
Hendrik
cot config, something like "always keep a 'dovecot-shared' file in
users maildir, even if that mailbox is not shared"? That would be nice,
since creating that files by hand is really time-consuming. Or are there
any relations which avoid making this issue configurabl
Hi Seba,
> is it possible to compile dovecot 1.2.5 with the managesieve patch
> 0.11.9
just tested this combination few days ago. works fine for me, but i haven't
tested all the small thing yet. maybe there are minor issues, but it generally
works.
hendrik
--
LWsystems Gm
t letter of the name,
'folde' for example. strange behaviour, since this happens with any
client. i hope somebody know what is wrong here.
thanks in advance,
hendrik
--
LWsystems GmbH & Co. KG ++ http://www.lw-systems.de/impressum
Tel: +49 (0)5403 / 5556 ++ Fax: +49 (0)5403 / 7
; "shared/edvINBOX"
reduced output to where the magic happens. two appereances which are
totally senseless to me.
lsub:
* LSUB () "/" "shared/edvINBOX"
* LSUB () "/" "shared/edv"
also reduced.
hth,
hendrik
--
LWsystems GmbH & Co.
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:02:23 +0100
Angel Marin wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
> > on 2-9-2009 8:07 PM Linux Advocate spake the following:
> >> guys , i m new to centos. i have learned to use yum and the
> >> priority plugin. Does the atrpm repo provide the most up to date
> >> version of dovecot? i
-- what deb line did you use in /etc/apt/sources.lst to
refer to the archived repositories?
-- hendrik
e future problems .
What's the scale of this problem? I.e., how large are the troublesome
"large mailboxes"? A gigabyte? A terabyte? a few megabytes?
-- hendrik
ystem in which the local Part ist Case sensitive!
Isn't the user name in the original Unix mail system (and presumably
most of its descentants) case sensitive? In which case it has to
distinguish between mail sent to bob and to Bob?
- hendrik
25 matches
Mail list logo