Re: [Dovecot] sieve vs deliver -m

On December 28, 2009 11:02:19 PM +0100 Stephan Bosch wrote: Frank Cusack wrote: On December 28, 2009 10:50:32 PM +0100 Stephan Bosch wrote: See the solution I presented elsewhere in this thread. That should do just that. Not if the user has control over his sieve scripts though (in which

[Dovecot] disable lazy_expunge for some mailboxes?

boundary to make it into the lazy_expunge namespace (location is under the user's home directory). As a workaround can I run a daily cron job to remove messages with the \Deleted flag on them? If so how do I find them? thanks -frank

Re: [Dovecot] Shared mailboxes do not support subfolders

On December 29, 2009 12:06:06 AM +0100 Nick Rosier wrote: Shared as in user-shared mailboxes. I think it was a mailclient (TB) problem. After subscribing from webmail (roundcube) I'm able to see them. I will do some more testing to see if I can reproduce. Did you read the bottom of

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-shared

client presents an error dialog when it fails to set the \Seen flag. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-shared

On December 29, 2009 4:49:56 PM -0500 Timo Sirainen wrote: On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 03:03 -0500, Frank Cusack wrote: On December 29, 2009 1:59:53 AM -0500 Timo Sirainen wrote: > Yeah, that's been in todo for a while. I'd probably make dovecot-shared > file have options: I w

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-shared

On December 29, 2009 3:03:56 AM -0500 Frank Cusack wrote: I was just thinking today it would be nice to have per-USER private or shared. So e.g. all users by default might share \Seen \Answered but some admin users have private \Seen, and don't have to worry about resetting the \Seen flag

Re: [Dovecot] disable lazy_expunge for some mailboxes?

On December 29, 2009 5:20:40 PM -0500 Timo Sirainen wrote: That's not intentional. Even if they were in same filesystem, it shouldn't do that. Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/029c3afcfbd0 looks great. i won't be able to test until after the weekend but it sure looks like how i wa

[Dovecot] 1.2.9 -llber

1.2.9: configure: Added -llber to ldap libs. Fixes linking in some systems. and breaks it on others. Sun Solaris' native ldap library does not have a separate liblber. I normally check for ber_free in libldap, then in liblber, then fail. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] disable lazy_expunge for some mailboxes?

On December 29, 2009 5:20:40 PM -0500 Timo Sirainen wrote: That's not intentional. Even if they were in same filesystem, it shouldn't do that. Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/029c3afcfbd0 works for me

Re: [Dovecot] imap default separator ignored?

t;a.b" because when this looks like a/b in Maildir++. So, . is always illegal, and whatever your separator character is, is also illegal. You can use the folder structure (ie, maildir instead of maildir++) and then . should be legal but I personally haven't tried this. I think you just append :LAYOUT=fs to the location spec to use it. -frank

[Dovecot] stripping attachments

there is a windows tool that strips attachments from emails on the server. i think it works for exchange. is there a tool or a way to do this for imap? i don't mean a mail filter that would strip them before the user sees them, i mean that the user could actively cooperate to reduce mail storag

[Dovecot] outlook 2007 can't see public folders more than 1 deep

not to append '/' to its name as you create it." -frank

Re: [Dovecot] "leave mail on server" workaround

n general an d offer IMAP only? People who want their mail on their local computer can achive this by copiyng from the (IMAP-)folder to the local folders. --Frank Elsner

Re: [Dovecot] "leave mail on server" workaround

On January 10, 2010 1:34:25 AM +0100 Kirill Miazine wrote: What would be the best way to disallow them using such approach. That is, what is the best way to force deletion of messages that have been RETRieved in a POP session at the end of that POP session? RETRieved messages will be marked as

[Dovecot] shared namespaces with common prefix prefix

r that the mailbox doesn't exist. If they can't have a common part of the prefix, is that an IMAP limitation or could dovecot conceivably handle it? -frank

Re: [Dovecot] shared namespaces with common prefix prefix

On January 14, 2010 2:22:08 PM -0500 Frank Cusack wrote: # to share other employees mailboxes (term'd or admin access) namespace shared { separator = / prefix = zz/shared/%%u/ location = maildir:/var/maildir/%%n:INDEX=/var/maildir/users/%%u subscriptions = no list = children }

[Dovecot] listen to imap*s* on multiple ports?

;t do START TLS) and 80 (to get past L3/L4 firewalls). I'd like to do it in dovecot rather than use nc, ipfilter or whatever. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] shared namespaces with common prefix prefix

On January 19, 2010 2:54:35 PM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote: Right. Another thing that seems a bit scary is that you sometimes use %n and sometimes %u. If %n is enough to identify the user, maybe it should be consistently used everywhere? That was intentional.

Re: [Dovecot] outlook 2007 can't see public folders more than 1 deep

On January 12, 2010 4:29:42 PM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote: On 9.1.2010, at 4.22, Frank Cusack wrote: Outlook 2007 can't see any folders except at the top level. It can create them just fine, but can't see them after quit and restart. Get the IMAP traffic between Outlook and Dov

[Dovecot] format of file dict

of those looks obvious) but also lines with just a '1'. Do I just need to separate entries by lines with just '1' in them? -frank

[Dovecot] mailbox format w/ separate headers/data

rt is stored in a separate file, you get massive compression "for free". -frank

Re: [Dovecot] mailbox format w/ separate headers/data

On January 22, 2010 11:05:22 PM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote: Dunno about zfs, but I've heard that at least in one NetApp installation deduplication was way too heavyweight. zfs dedup is pretty resources intensive -- for writes. For mail I suspect reads overwhelm writes? -frank

Re: [Dovecot] mailbox format w/ separate headers/data

On January 22, 2010 11:05:22 PM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote: On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 15:53 -0500, Frank Cusack wrote: In the future, it would be cool if there were a mailbox format (dbox2?) where mail headers and each mime part were stored in separate files. This would enable the zfs dedup feature

Re: [Dovecot] mailbox format w/ separate headers/data

p'ing. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] mailbox format w/ separate headers/data

On January 22, 2010 11:44:07 PM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote: On 22.1.2010, at 23.39, Frank Cusack wrote: On January 22, 2010 11:21:09 PM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote: Or will there be a global index? Yes. That's what dbox SIS is about. You have a global repository of (large) MIME

[Dovecot] maildir on zfs (was: mailbox format w/ separate headers/data)

-user, if by "lots" you mean 1000 or 1000s then you have the problem that it takes forever to mount all of those filesytems on reboot. That's not a maildir-specific problem though. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] sieve or another vacation/autoreply

On January 25, 2010 6:32:34 PM +0100 Lampa wrote: i'm trying to do some delivery notification for each incoming address. Problem is that sieve vacation has :days but minimum value is 1 eg period in which addresses are kept and are not responded to - but that is not that i want. What do you

Re: [Dovecot] sieve or another vacation/autoreply

On January 25, 2010 9:10:42 PM +0100 Lampa wrote: Need autmatic delivery notification. You could find my patch which I posted roughly a month ago. It allows '0' as the :days parameter to vacation. Maybe you prefer that to notify, maybe not. -frnak

Re: [Dovecot] maildir on zfs

media like that, as a stream, to restore it you MIGHT need an OS with the same version of zfs on it. zfs has already been through several versions, but I don't know what the compatibility of send streams between the versions are. OK, we're really OT now! :) -frank

Re: [Dovecot] mdbox, dsync

On January 29, 2010 6:53:10 PM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote: Anyway, let's hope it doesn't now corru. d...@...x>. LOST CARRIER huh?

[Dovecot] dovecot auth feature request

= 0660 } } } I get this: Error: ssl_cert_file: Can't use /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem: No such file or directory Since, in this configuration, SSL doesn't have meaning, dovecot shouldn't be looking for any cert file. Easily fixed with "ssl = no" but that shouldn't be required. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot auth feature request

On January 29, 2010 7:11:59 PM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote: On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:01 -0500, Frank Cusack wrote: when i try to run dovecot for SASL support only, with literally just this configuration: protocols = none ssl = no I suppose you didn't mean to include "ssl=no&quo

Re: [Dovecot] Anyone successfully setup Continous Backup of mailboxes using rsync ?

e mail to a 2nd mail server and use another method to synchronize deletions and flag changes.) -frank

[Dovecot] disabling mail delivery for a user

How can I disable mail delivery for a user yet still allow access to their mailbox from another account which their mail is shared to? If I put them in a userdb which has "deny = yes" that just disables their ability to login, yes? And they would still have mail delivered. I want to disable the

Re: [Dovecot] disabling mail delivery for a user

s that don't know that user account has gone away. I prefer not to do it in the MTA so as to keep the MTA as free from this type of configuration that lingers for years and makes future migrations difficult. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] disabling mail delivery for a user

and can't figure out how to do this. I do have one constraint: my userdb/passdb is a passwd-file. If that's not compatible I'd still like to know how to do it with LDAP (preferably) or SQLite. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] disabling mail delivery for a user

On February 2, 2010 6:56:31 PM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote: You could do: passdb passwd-file { args = /etc/deny.%s deny = yes } duh, it's so obvious now. :) thanks!

Re: [Dovecot] disabling mail delivery for a user

Last question on deny userdb, I hope. Comments in dovecot.conf: # File contains a list of usernames, one per line Does that mean the deny passdb has a different format than other passdb's? -frank

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot and AFS

On February 2, 2010 9:06:45 PM +0100 Per-Erik Persson wrote: Scrolling thru the archives gives me a hint that there might be troubles with AFS together with dovecot and maildir especially the LDA Is this still an issue or should I prepare for spending time to solve it? If someone successfully go

Re: [Dovecot] disabling mail delivery for a user

nores the deny passdb, that is it doesn't consult it at all, as opposed to imap which does consult it. Is that expected behavior? It's fine by me, since I can still access the disabled user's mailbox from another account that it is shared to. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] disabling mail delivery for a user

ed (not found) userdb lookup should invalidate the shared mailbox. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] deny=yes in userdb

r MTA (or perhaps to anyone). -frank

Re: [Dovecot] deny=yes in userdb

On February 2, 2010 10:05:47 PM +0100 Edgar Fuß wrote: nss authentication? BTW, you misspoke. nss doesn't authenticate.

Re: [Dovecot] Question re: storing non mail files via IMAP

On February 3, 2010 4:49:50 PM -0500 Charles Marcus wrote: I have a question regarding how dovecot might behave if a mail client (like, for example, Thunderbird) decided to store some of its config files on the IMAP server itself. Would there be a decent way of doing this with dovecot that woul

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot and AFS

nlike NFS, AFS has strong consistency. So that shouldn't be a problem. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot and AFS

On February 4, 2010 4:40:37 AM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote: If it acts just like a local filesystem, then it doesn't have any problems with Dovecot. But that guarantee usually makes the performance worse, so I would have thought it had less strong guarantees. Anyway, I don't know almost anything a

[Dovecot] Problems with thunderbird 3 ( messages mark unread after being read )

Hello Since we upgrade all our users's PC with Thunderbird 3(.0.1) many of them have a problem with email that move back to unread status even after they have read them. The problem does not occured with Thunderbird 2 Is this problem Dovecot related ? Do you have the same trouble ? Thank you

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot and AFS SOLVED

IP-based access is totally fine if that part of your network is physically secure. It sure solves a lot of headaches. On 2/10/10 10:22 AM +0100 Per-Erik Persson wrote: Well, what you describe would be the correct and security aware way of doing it. However since I am still testing i just did

[Dovecot] Dovecot + managesieve + Roundcube

Hello I've installed managesieve on my mailhub FreeBSD from dovecot-managesieve ports to let roundcube users build email filters. The filter are well created in the right directory but the filter seems inefficient ( it does not filter ;-) ) see below the result of the dovecot -n command Thanks

[Dovecot] deliver problem ( Error: file_dotlock_create )

Hello all ( Postfix and Dovecot ) Trying to use deliver as mailbox_command with Postfix I get this error each time an email is arriving deliver(): Error: file_dotlock_create(/var/mail/) failed: Permission denied (euid=3003() egid=3010(smig) missing +w perm: /var/mail) (

Re: [Dovecot] [RCU] Dovecot managesieve

stfix/main.cf (postconf(5)): That's what I did but then I have this problem with DOTLOCK If I chmod 777 /var/mail directory it works but I do not feel comfortable with that kind of access rights ... On 02/12/10 20:39, Joseph Kolb wrote: Hi Frank, the question is, do you use the LDA

Re: [Dovecot] [RCU] Dovecot managesieve

On 02/15/10 10:56, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Frank Bonnet put forth on 2/15/2010 3:21 AM: Well I've looked forward into the wiki and did not found my server have only system users ( no virtual domain ) and the wiki says : System users If you wish you use deliver for all system users on a s

[Dovecot] Slooow imap copy to "Sent" folders

Hello Many users here use the "copy to Sent folder" using the IMAP protocol with Dovecot 2.1.15 on a FresBSD 9 server. Since few days this operation ( copy to sent folder ) became longer than before , it could takes several seconds to complete even the message is very short. Is there a paramete

[Dovecot] login crashes - maybe too many simultan connections

: passwd May anybody help? Thanks in advance! Greetings from Frank.

[Dovecot] put users's mailbox in read only mode

Hello For internal purpose I need to put some users's mailboxes and IMAP folders in read only mode during few days. We use MBOX format and UNIX real users mode ( FreeBSD 9.1 ) thanks for any info

[Dovecot] read only users's mailboxes

Hello for internal purpose I need to put some users's mailboxes in readonly mode during few days. We use MBOX format and UNIX user mode on a FreeBSD 9.1 box I tried to read-only mount the partition but dovecot does not work this way Any infos welcome

Re: [Dovecot] read only users's mailboxes

On 05/22/2013 10:42 AM, Christian Wiese wrote: Hi Frank, maybe you should take a look at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/ACL. Cheers, Chris Am Wed, 22 May 2013 10:38:55 +0200 schrieb Frank Bonnet : Hello for internal purpose I need to put some users's mailboxes in readonly mode during few

[Dovecot] Problems with Apple Mail: Enter Password for Account "..."

on't find anything about this. Thank you and kind regards frank

[Dovecot] deny users

hello I'm in trouble with the deny feature the log is like the following Jun 18 17:37:53 auth: Error: Error in configuration file /usr/local/etc/dovecot/deny.imap line 1: Expecting '=' in the documentation said to write one username per line in the deny file that is what I did ...what is the for

Re: [Dovecot] deny users

hello Timo thanks for the answer I found my mistake after posting ... overwork since two weeks sorry for the noise Envoyé de mon iPhone. Le 18 juin 2013 à 18:05, Timo Sirainen a écrit : > On 18.6.2013, at 18.59, "BONNET, Frank" wrote: > >> I'm in trouble with

[Dovecot] popup to all users ?

Hello I need to have a information popup will be send when my thunderbird's users connect to our server. Is there a function in Dovecot to do so ? Thank you

[Dovecot] The "<" sign in config files

Hallo experts, what is the meaning of the "<" sign in config files as in ssl_key =

[Dovecot] Quota to use limits from LDAP and usage from FS

an anybody confirm this behavior or is there a way to achieve what I intend? -frank signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot and PFS

t.conf: login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m rip=%r lip=%l %c %k The "%k" writes the negotiated cipher into the log, see also http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Variables Regards, Frank -- Frank Behrens Osterwieck, Germany

[Dovecot] dovecot: ssl-params

parameters Oct 9 07:01:06 seymour dovecot: imap-login: Login: frank, 192.168.28.1, TLS Oct 9 07:01:06 seymour dovecot: ssl-params: SSL parameters regeneration completed Oct 9 07:01:07 seymour dovecot: ssl-params: Error: epoll_ctl(del, 7) failed: No such file or directory Oct 9 07:01:07 seymour

[Dovecot] secure email server

Hello I have to setup a "secured" email server - encrypted filesystem - SSL or TLS only for SMTP and IMAPS - Talking only to some known other same-secured servers Any info/links welcome ! Please do not start some flame war around this ! I've been ordered to set up such server and I KNOW there

Re: [Dovecot] secure email server

SMTP & IMAP access *Frank BONNET* Systemes UNIX et Reseaux ESIEE PARIS 01.45.92.66.17 - 06.70.37.37.69 2013/10/23 Steffen Kaiser > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, BONNET, Frank wrote: > > I have to setup a "secured"

[Dovecot] ssl-params regeneration with dovecot 2.2.7

Hello, after switching from version 2.2.7 to 2.2.7 I miss the loglines which say: ssl-params: Generating SSL parameters ssl-params: SSL parameters regeneration completed The configuration has not been changed and reads: | # 2.2.7: /usr/local/dovecot/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf | # OS: Linux 2.6.

Re: [Dovecot] ssl-params regeneration with dovecot 2.2.7

On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:01:54 +0100 Frank Elsner wrote: > Hello, > > after switching from version 2.2.7 to 2.2.7 I miss the loglines which say: Sorry, typo. Should read "after switching from version 2.2.6 to 2.2.7" ^ --Frank

Re: [Dovecot] Allow both SSL/993 and STARTTLS/143 connections (secure only)

on the other port (STARTTLS/143)? You dont' need 2 namespaces. In 10-auth.conf set "disable_plaintext_auth = yes" My 10-master.conf contains | service imap-login { | inet_listener imap { | port = 143 | } | inet_listener imaps { | port = 993 | ssl = yes | } And this works. --Frank Elsner pgpUD5rT29dHJ.pgp Description: PGP signature

[Dovecot] Dovecot 2 separate login for POP3 connections ?

Hello Is it possible to configure a separate logfile for incoming POP3 connections ( dovecot 2.2.9 ) thanks

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2 separate login for POP3 connections ?

let's try :-) *Frank BONNET* Systemes UNIX et Reseaux ESIEE PARIS 01.45.92.66.17 - 06.70.37.37.69 2014/1/16 Axel Luttgens > Le 16 janv. 2014 à 10:29, "BONNET, Frank" a écrit > : > > > Hello > > > > Is it possible to configure a separate logfile f

[Dovecot] Looking for HowTo Postifx, Dovecot and PostgreSQL

it seems to be little outdated for recent versions of dovecot (the auth part of dovecot.conf). Also its lagging some inforamtions I wasn't able to find on my own (e.g. how to set password for a imap account). Can somebody give me a hint for a up-2-date howto for some noob as I

Re: [Dovecot] Looking for HowTo Postifx, Dovecot and PostgreSQL

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:47:47 +0100 martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Frank Lanitz [2014-02-10 10:14 > +0100]: > > I know it's a bit a n00bish question, but I'm a little confused > > about this many different ways on setting up dovecot with postfix > >

Re: [Dovecot] Looking for HowTo Postifx, Dovecot and PostgreSQL

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:07:46 +0100 "martin f. krafft" wrote: > also sprach Frank Lanitz [2014-02-10 11:56 > +0100]: > > Looks nice -- any experince using it with tine20 later? > > I have no idea what tine20 is and the website only contains > buzzwords, sorry.

Re: [Dovecot] basic dsync wrapper for migration from another server

On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:41:24 +0100 Frank Elsner wrote: > On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 14:45:05 +0100 Alan McGinlay wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I cobbled together this somewhat shoddy Bash script to migrate email > > accounts from our Cyrus server to a new dovecot system. Feel free

Re: [Dovecot] basic dsync wrapper for migration from another server

o you know http://www.cyrus2dovecot.sw.fu-berlin.de Kind regards, Frank pgpQ131Wwx5Xr.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: ot: accepting self certs into win pc?

try Apple. I wrote some notes on it once: http://blog.frankleonhardt.com/2012/certificate-errors-on-internet-explorer-9-and-how-to-stop-them/ I didn't mention it in the post, but IIRC this did work for making some versions Outlook (and other Microsoft Mail things) happy at the same time. Regards, Frank.

Re: ot: accepting self certs into win pc?

On 11/06/2014 10:00, mourik jan heupink - merit wrote: Apologies. I noticed only now that the certificate was issued for the real servername, and I'm using a dns alias to connect. Sorry. On 6/11/2014 10:56, mourik jan heupink - merit wrote: Hi Frank, list, On 6/10/2014 3:10, Frank Leon

Re: ot: accepting self certs into win pc?

On 11/06/2014 09:56, mourik jan heupink - merit wrote: Hi Frank, list, On 6/10/2014 3:10, Frank Leonhardt wrote: I get endless grief over this, but if you think Microsoft is bad, try Apple. I wrote some notes on it once: http://blog.frankleonhardt.com/2012/certificate-errors-on-internet

Re: identify MUA connecting?

used" is impossible > > there is no user-agent like HTTP and even for HTTP the header is not > mandatory and rqeuire it will break your web-app for anybody who cares > for privacy while gain nothing Not in general: cyrus/imaps[9143]: client id: "name" "Thunderbird" "version" "24.6.0" I guess, dovecot simply must learn it. --Frank Elsner

Re: spam folder and POP users

e to many reasons. Peopla always complain "where is my mail" when using a web interface after they have POPped at home. You should consider to switch off POP. POP is for people living in caves. Greeting, Frank

[Dovecot] sasl authentication via dovecot

I am setting up a Postfix/Dovecot/Virtual Domains system, with virtual tables using Postfixadmin and MySQL. Incoming mail is accepted for the virtual mailboxes, but when I try to retrieve mail from Outlook or Thunderbird I get errors You cannot log in to abc.server.net because the server has disa

[Dovecot] Convert UW folders to Dovecot folders ?

much more sophisticated. Does anyone has written such ( nice) utility ? Thanks a lot Frank

Re: [Dovecot] Convert UW folders to Dovecot folders ?

Luigi Rosa wrote: Frank Bonnet said the following on 19/03/2007 13.59: How to convert IMAP folders from UW format ( one file / folder ) to dovecot format which seems much more sophisticated. If you want to convert mailbox format to maildir (Dovecot supports many formats), take a look at

[Dovecot] PHP implementation of dovecotpw passwords

I am looking for PHP functions that implement passwords that much the dovecotpw implementation. I downloaded one from PEAR, Crypt_HMAC, but the passwords it generates look nothing like the dovecotpw passwords, which could be my fault because I know nothing about the field. Is there a guide or s

Re: [Dovecot] LDA bouncing mails after upgrade

s, avoiding the need for a setuid root program altogether. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] gssapi auth issue...

gethostname(3c)). That's broken. When using Kerberos, hostnames need to be FQDN's. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] Version numbering

ter I like 1.1.0{a,b,rc}N -> 1.1.0 Even-odd is confusing because you can't tell which 1.1.x versions are newer than any 1.2.y version. -frank

[Dovecot] transfer files from Plesk qmail to Dovecot and Postfix

I have some files I want to transfer from Plesk qmail to Postfix with virtual mailboxes, MySQL, Maildir etc. I can add the accounts to the database manually as there are only a few of them. In the case of the mail folders, is it merely a matter of copying the mail files over, or are there some ad

Re: [Dovecot] Version numbering

On March 28, 2007 8:46:08 AM +0200 Juergen Daubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:28:24PM -0700, Frank Cusack wrote: > Timo Sirainen wrote: >> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version >> numbers. But any comments on which o

Re: [Dovecot] Version numbering

On March 28, 2007 3:59:59 PM -0400 John Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Frank Cusack wrote: You misunderstood that. After the release of 1.2.0, 1.1.x is frozen and development starts again in 1.3.0. And then how do you release 1.2.1? This is a well understood process (ev

Re: [Dovecot] Version numbering

sion. With even/odd, it's always the highest numbered even release. With a/b/rc, it's always the highest numbered numeric release. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] transfer files from Plesk qmail to Dovecot and Postfix

On 28/03/07, Frank Church <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have some files I want to transfer from Plesk qmail to Postfix with virtual mailboxes, MySQL, Maildir etc. I can add the accounts to the database manually as there are only a few of them. In the case of the mail folders, is it me

Re: [Dovecot] Version numbering

On March 28, 2007 5:07:30 PM -0400 John Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But the argument that numeric only works much better for packagers is very powerful, IMNSHO... Yeah, I agree with that.

Re: [Dovecot] Version numbering

hows how popular dovecot really is. Since none of us has any say in the matter. What have you wrought Timo?? WHAT HAVE YOU WROUGHT? :-) -frank

Re: [Dovecot] 1.0.rc29 released

ill look like betas and I have no idea which one (if any) is less a regression than any other. They ARE betas. That's no reason to stay with 0.99. It's effectively beta as well. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] 1.0.rc29 released

On March 30, 2007 4:05:55 PM -0700 Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On Friday, March 30, 2007 3:24 PM -0700 Frank Cusack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is why I'm still using 0.99. The RC's still look like betas and I have no idea which one (if any) is less

Re: [Dovecot] 1.0.rc29 released

lopment version". Or are you too stupid and ignorant to learn how the versioning works for dovecot. (Sorry, that's directed to another dovecot thread; I'm not calling you stupid and ignorant.) Seriously though, if you so desperately want dovecot frozen somewhere, use 1.0beta8 or 1.0rc1 and pretend it was released as 1.0. -frank

Re: [Dovecot] 1.0.rc29 released

On March 30, 2007 5:04:58 PM -0700 Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On Friday, March 30, 2007 4:52 PM -0700 Frank Cusack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's very easy. In the dovecot world, "rc" means "development version". Or are you too stupid and

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >