Hi,
about https://wiki.dovecot.org/DovecotInit, i wondered
about
stop)
if test $running = yes; then
echo "Stopping Dovecot"
kill `cat $pidfile`
echo "."
else
echo "Dovecot is already stopped."
fi
;;
Is "doveadm stop&quo
eport-spam.sieve and report-ham.sieve scripts, and
absolutely nothing changed, which is why I think the rules aren't being
tried.
The requisite doveconf -n output:
- - - -8< - - - -
# 2.3.13 (89f716dc2): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.5.13 (cdd19fe3
Aki Tuomi wrote:
> We provide this handy guide for teaching spam filters, see
> https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/howto/antispam_with_sieve/
Yes, I followed that and am having trouble. I think (haven't yet confirmed
through a protocol trace) that the problem is Outlook using APPEND
Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Yeah. Outlook does APPEND+EXPUNGE instead of MOVE.
That rather critical item should probably be mentioned in the configuration
manual; in my searching about on the problem, I didn't find anything that
indicated this Microsoft-caused limitation. On the upside, I'm glad I found
s.yappy
Don't let your schooling get in the way of your education.
From: Dan Egli
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2021 23:50
To: st...@watt.com; dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Sieve daemon errors? (Part 1 of 2, Pt 2 to follow when Pt 1
resolved)
Ask and ye shall receive: # dovecot -n
# 2
let your schooling get in the way of your education.
From: Dan Egli
Sent: Saturday, May 1, 2021 08:10
To: st...@watt.com; dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Sieve daemon errors? (Part 1 of 2, Pt 2 to follow when Pt 1
resolved)
Still haven't heard back on why 4190 isn't being listened
P.S. the .BAK file shows sieve present, but the line is still commented out.
--
Steve Watt KD6GGD PP-ASEL-IA factories.words.yappy
Don't let your schooling get in the way of your education.
From: Steve Watt
Sent: Saturday, May 1, 2021 13:04
To: 'Dan Egli&#
Using Dovecot 2.3.8 with Postfix & MySQL on Centos.
I have a sql table with account info, email addresses, password, quotas,
etc
I have another sql table for aliases containing which alias points to
what email address.
For imap access im using passdb password_query with prefetch.
I s
On 06-26-2021 7:39 pm, dove...@ptld.com wrote:
First question: Is this the best way to configure dovecot using quota
verification for postfix to work will aliases?
Second question: How can i prevent directories and indexes being
created for non found user (aliases) accounts?
I figured out i
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/sieve/configuration/
Pigeonhole creates logs separate from main dovecot logs. I see
sieve_user_log allows you to change log location and it says if you
don't set it logs are still made by default.
I can not find anything about log rotati
Is there a way to have a per-user default sieve script get auto created
if it doesn't exist?
Or created on first time use like when the directory set by
plugin{sieve=file:~/} gets created?
Not global scripts.
I don't understand what im doing wrong.
Password = test
Salt = salt
MariaDB> select to_base64(concat(sha2('testsalt', 512), 'salt'));
NmM4MzhlOTM0ZTNmZWVmYWU2Y2ZhNTNhZjExMzc1ZDQ5NTRmODVjNmY1ZWQ4ODhjMDJjZDc4MDZhNzE2OTZkMWNiNDQ5ZjJiZTc4ZTllNmVhMzAxYTk1YzgxZjI4YWQ4NzY2ZjNhZTU4MmY5YmVhYWMzM2M3ZGMy
Is there a way, or a config setting, that would allow you to for-reals
delete an email from the inbox instead of sending it to the Trash
folder? Not always, the default behavior should still send deleted
emails to the trash folder, but on a per case bases be able to just
delete an email without
this is imho not controlled in dovecot at all
Oops, wrong mailing list.
I meant to send this to the roundcube mailing list.
On 07-05-2021 10:29 am, Tobias Leupold wrote:
So, to avoid this, one has to FIRST deactivate the respectice script,
so that
USER.sieve is updated and THEN delete the script. Or to manually fix
USER.sieve on the server, which is surely not what's intended.
Curious, can you also fix the situati
On 07-05-2021 1:04 pm, Tobias Leupold wrote:
There's no symlink pointing to that very script. I have virtual users,
so I
keep the respective sieve scripts in /srv/sieve/user@domain/.
Such a directory looks like that:
active-script.sieve -> USER.sieve
USER.sieve
some-script.sieve
On 07-05-2021 1:34 pm, Tobias Leupold wrote:
Yes, that is the one im talking about: active-script.sieve
Just remove that symlink and sieve will be disabled for that user and
you shouldn't have any errors.
Yeah, of course I won't -- but sieve filtering won't work as well
without the
symlink ..
On 07-05-2021 2:04 pm, Tobias Leupold wrote:
When I delete a sieve script via the managesieve interface of KMail, I
would
expect that this script is removed from the USER.sieve script so that
it's no
longer included and not run anymore. Then, it should be deleted.
As far as sieve is concerne
On 07-05-2021 4:59 pm, techli...@phpcoderusa.com wrote:
Jul 5 18:58:47 soho dovecot: auth: Debug:
passwd-file(ke...@keiththewebguy.com,98.191.108.149,):
lookup: user=ke...@keiththewebguy.com file=/etc/dovecot/dovecot-users
Jul 5 18:58:47 soho dovecot: auth:
passwd-file(ke
On 07-05-2021 7:49 pm, techli...@phpcoderusa.com wrote:
Ok, figured out the issue. My passwd-file was not configured
correctly.
Now I can send however I cannot receive. I find nothing in the logs.
Now you are back to a postfix question so you might be told to move the
convo back there.
You
I setup an al...@example.com in postfix to point at m...@example.com
I send one email to m...@example.com and al...@example.com, tried both
ways of using CC and putting both addresses in the To field.
I see in postfix logs that it delivers two messages to dovecot-lmtp.
However i only get one
I have found that dynamic IP blocking programs such as sshguard or
fail2ban
are a CPU burden since that table needs to be refreshed as new IPs are
added
or removed so I have stopped using them.
Have you seen ipset?
https://ipset.netfilter.org/
It is built for dynamically adding/remove IP's fr
Are you sure? I know that postfix can use the same backend database
for authentication as dovecot, and dovecot can be the master, but
dovecot
does NOT listen on port 25 or 587 at all, those are all just used by
Postfix.
Not true anymore. Dovecot added a submission service in a recent
now you want it to be
checking for over quota. It just sends every thing over to dovcot who
knows that you want to be checking for over quota. One of the key=values
postfix sends is size= of the message size. Dovecot looks at this
and ignores the rest of what postfix sent and returns a result.
At least from Thunderbird, yes. But SIZE=… does not seem to be a
mandatory addition to the RCPT-TO line. Perhaps other mail clients do
not use SIZE either. Just guessting.
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
The "size" attribute value specifies the message size that the client
spec
and since dovecot does not know postfix virtual aliases is would make
sense dovecot also support postfix virtual aliases in dovecot quota
service
Why not? You can create a query telling dovecot to lookup the quota of
the mailbox the alias points to. Ofcourse your tables wont look like
mine
It sounds like a better approach would be to make Dovecot reject any
email no matter what the size is (even size=0) if a user is over
quota. I'll take further discussion to the dovecot mailing list then.
If you are not aware, dovecot has by default a 10% over quota grace. So
even be
Plus Dovecot complains that the policy service is only supposed to be
used in the RCPT stage. So clearly this is a bad approach.
I want to explore this more. I tried it and also see:
dovecot[1096]: quota-status(26164): Warning: Received policy query from
MTA in unexpected state END-OF-MESSAGE
There isn't much documentation on quota_grace.
How would you disable quota grace?
quota_grace = 0
quota_grace = 0%
quota_grace = 0m
quota_grace = -1
Assuming "0" isn't an "unlimited" setting?
In the sieve plugin settings i have
plugin {
...
sieve_user_email = %u
}
Variables pages says
%u = full username (e.g. user@domain)
This config seems to work in practice, the email is from: the users
email address.
However on starting dovecot im getting a warning twice
The only solution is to reject all mail for an over-quota recipient
during recipient restrictions, and if the mail passes that stage,
deliver it anyway even if it makes the user go over quota.
But does this happen out of the box? Wont dovecot end up back splatter
bouncing one of the recipients
if that is entirely done in the postfix side dovecot could be stopped
and it will still work on the postfix side of it, if dovecot policy
service is down, postfix will not get the result from it, but it could
failback to check dovecot dict still with is used in postfixadmin,
I think the issue
Was the update issue sorted? Is it safe to update or was/is there a
glitch? Or did the person with the issue update from the wrong branch?
And just to confirm, based on the change log in this email it doesn't
look like we need to change anything in our config for this update?
(Coming from 2.3.
starting dovecot im getting a warning twice:
dovecot[35893]: managesieve: Warning: sieve: Invalid address value
for
setting `sieve_user_email': Missing domain
dovecot[35893]: master: Dovecot v2.3.8 (9df20d2db) starting up for
imap, lmtp, sieve
dovecot[35897]: managesieve: Warning:
On 08-11-2021 5:39 pm, Joseph D Wagner wrote:
dovecot[51153]: dict(51395): Panic: lib-sql: Too many bind args (2)
for statement: SELECT attr_name FROM attributes WHERE attr_name LIKE
AND username = ?
No idea if this is the only problem, but the sql query has invalid
syntax.
SELECT
Maybe there's something wrong with my "map" configuration, which led
to the improper syntax (see original email), but it's Dovecot that
generated the syntax.
I have not used dictionaries and do not have first hand working
knowledge. Until someone else more knowledgeable c
-value authentication
(dict) database via socket as per
Or another option...
Using SQL would allow you to have key-value, you can have different mail
location per domain / user, and dovecot can talk to SQL over TCP or
unix:socket. You wouldn't need to make a script, and when users are
s
age.
Maybe it can give you hints as to the format needed for a python script.
On the same page it also says:
When given a proxy URL the Dict backend speaks a simple protocol over a
UNIX socket.
The protocol is defined in src/lib-dict/dict-client.h
https://github.com/dovecot/core/blob/master/sr
Im trying to get my head around this problem that too many valid emails
from the mailing list fail dmarc. Why when other mailing list don't seem
to have the same problem? I see today it says "signature verification
failed", but why? Is there a problem with protonmail's dkim
So this looks really good and fast. So I think we can say with
confidence solr is doing its job. So why is roundcube/dovecot taking
so long to show the results?
Random guess... Buffering?
Whatever is sending to the browser isn't sending enough bytes to flush
the buffer so the data is le
I have a dovecot cluster with directror and two IMAP Servers behind.
Since they are in geographical different locations I would like to
have users to go to a specific IMAP backend server (if both are up)
and only switch to the other if one goes down (failover).
As to my current knowledge the
On 09-01-2021 2:21 pm, Joan Moreau wrote:
Just for clarity, Open-Xchange has not written any xapian plugin
whatsoever.
Yes but the doc says that Open Xchaneg "supports" one over the other.
Honestly, I am doing this over my free time, begin very reactive to
user requests, and have this confirm
Dovecot quota plugin returns code 554 5.2.2 when a user inbox is full.
Why 554 (transaction failed) instead of 552 (exceeded storage
allocation)? Im curious behind the logic as im trying to determine the
best code to use to reject a user sending more emails than their
number-of-emails-limit
, how do i use this with proxy?
passdb {
driver = sql
args = /etc/dovecot/mysql_login
}
userdb {
driver = prefetch
}
/etc/dovecot/mysql_login:
driver = mysql
connect = host=/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock dbname=redacted
user=redacted password=red
On 09-04-2021 4:28 pm, Steve Dondley wrote:
I don't want dovecot to wait X days before sending out another
vacation response. However, setting the :days to "0" doesn't work.
RFC https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5230.html#section-4.1 says:
4.1. Days Parameter
The &quo
does the {MD5} vs {SHA512-CRYPT} in passwd over-rule
auth-passwdfile.conf.ext ?
Yes this is by design and is why passwords are prefixed with the type.
This allows easy upgrade to stronger encryption in the future without
having to throw out all the old passwords at once. It allows users to
re
The last-login plugin sends a number (epoch seconds) as uint or string
in a query to sql. If i create a column type in sql of varchar() the
number is saved in the column as a string, but not very useful.
I can not figure out how to get that value into a date/time column such
as date, datetime
s a dict map{}. I can not create my own query for the
plugin to execute otherwise this would be way easier. Using the map{}
method all you can do it tell it the column name to update and the
plugin/dovecot writes the insert on dupe query automatically removing
any kind of flexibility or customizat
Assuming you use MariaDB / MySQL, you create this trigger in the
database.
Assuming your int/bigint/varchar column is lastlogin and the table name
is mailacct,
the trigger will update the datetime `logindate` column whenever the
table is updated,
by whatever existing queries you have. This is yo
Aki;
I know most likely this isn't dovecot's fault, however upgrading from
2.3.8 to 2.3.16 broke the password plugin for roundcube. Im only asking
if you might know what changes in dovecot might have caused this
incompatibility so i can fix it myself or point roundcube in the right
ation file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
line 19: ssl_key: Can't open file
/etc/letsencrypt/live/example_cert/privkey.pem: Permission denied
I tried "doveadm quota get ..." from the console as user apache and got
the same error. I then tried running just "doveadm" and got t
Is there a difference between not setting
#ssl_cipher_list =
or setting to nothing
ssl_cipher_list =
or setting to
ssl_cipher_list = PROFILE=SYSTEM
Which is the best preferred way for default?
Also, the docs say "You should usually prefer server ciphers and their
order, so setting ssl_
Oct 03 20:19:52 auth: Error: net_connect_unix(auth-worker) in directory
/run/dovecot failed: Permission denied (euid=5000(vmail)
egid=5000(vmail) missing +r perm: /run/dovecot/auth-worker, dir owned
by 0:0 mode=0755)
I set this about an hour ago, then applied some security patches and
It looks like dovecot is trying to save the
compiled active script to the same directory as the source file,
instead of to bindir. Am I missing something?
sieve =
file:/usr/local/etc/mail/%{domain}/%{username}/sieve;
active=/usr/local/etc/mail/%{domain}/%{username}/sieve/.active.sieve
I thought active was where to read the active source script from? I'm
not using managesieve, so I wouldn't expect dovecot to try writing to
that file. I don't see anything in
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/sieve/configuration/
about active pointing at a compiled f
On 10-07-2021 5:51 am, Marc wrote:
Maybe update this to having multiple ports (if this is even possible)
frontend ft_imap
bind :110 <<
bind :143
mode tcp
default_backend bk_imap
backend bk_imap
mode tcp
balance leastconn
stick store-request src
stick-table type i
On 10-07-2021 4:30 am, Marc wrote:
With redhat 'dumping' the support for centos and the availability of
containers. I thought about reconsidering my default dovecot setup.
Since the concept of having a lts distribution that is supported by
redhat/centos is more or less 'unavaila
On 10-07-2021 11:57 am, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
The CentOS community manager is a friend and he understands that they
really missed the mark on the messaging around CentOS8 Stream.
In short, I'm not sure it's going to be that bad of a solution.
People think that because Redhat has repeatedly
I would like to archive e-mail older than 5 years on a second storage
Considering dovecot uses indexes, is there a performance benefit to the
inbox in moving older emails to an "archive" folder?
root@unix:/etc/dovecot# dovecot -F
doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
...maybe it's useful to add a 'quiet' option (i.e. no stdout) to
doveconf.
dovecot -F > /dev/null 2>&1
:)
n to go to their own
mailbox.
Your question might be more suited to the postfix mailing list. Dovecot
doesn't receive mail from the internet, which i believe you understand
as you said "have postfix accepting the emails before passing them to
Dovecot".
On the postfix side, one op
barbaz+te...@mydomain.com -> bar...@mydomain.com
You can change the + to any symbol you want postfix to look out for.
I think my "creating users" was me wanting to make sure that when
postfix
passes an email for "bar...@mydomain.com" to Dovecot, then Dovecot will
store it and wai
On 10-27-2021 11:10 pm, justina colmena ~biz wrote:
Interesting. Have you looked at this?
https://serverfault.com/questions/133190/host-wildcard-subdomains-using-postfix
That makes sense and would work, setting domains and user addresses with
perl regex expressions.
> fileinto :create "INBOX/${2}";
> }
I am not using variables and my folders are pre-created. But just to give you a
starting point, this is what works using maildir++ format with default
directory layout.
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/mail_location/Maildir/
nto different sent folders like work vs
personal. However i do not think it is possible as
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/sieve/troubleshooting/
says...
" Sieve scripts are executed by the Dovecot LDA (Local Delivery Agent) and/or
the Dovecot LMTP service. That is why you firs
> On 11-21-2021 1:15 pm, Elisamuel Resto wrote:
> I have gone through my configuration and even found a configuration example
> by Aki and that confirms how I configured it… still getting that
> error.
> Nov 15 12:19:19 wyvern dovecot[461]: dict(51438): Panic: lib-sql: Too many
> On 11-22-2021 5:11 am, Brent Clark wrote:
> dovecot: imap-login: Error: net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/stats-writer)
> failed: No such file or directory
>
> With a bit of googling, I tried the suggestions of:
> https://forum.iredmail.org/post67042.html#p67042
> http
> We are happy to announce 2.3.17.1 patch release of Dovecot.
> This contains some fixes for issues found after 2.3.17 release.
I am still seeing this issue in startup logs:
LOGS: dovecot[16466]: config: Warning: sieve: Invalid address value for setting
`sieve_user_email': Missing
> Basically I want the server to check if the message being sent is encrypted
> with OpenGPG and either proceed or reject the message based on that criteria.
Postfix is your submission service so i think best to look that direction. If
there is a header you can check for (if the header exist th
> spf is more stable
> results from current msg
DMARC breaks on dovecot mailing list.
DMARC does not break on postfix mailing list.
Having a mailing list that doesn't break DMARC is possible.
Maybe ask Wietse how he does it :)
> On 12-30-2021 10:35 am, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>
> But dovecot mailing list uses ARC Headers.
> And they seem to verify for me (using rspamd)
I have not fully studied ARC, but from briefly looking isn't ARC just a way for
the sending server to attest to the email it is relayi
>> mysql(localhost): Connect failed to database (postfix): Can't connect
>> to local MySQL server through socket '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2)
> Maybe MySQL is not running, or perhaps something is blocking connecting to
> it? Check dmesg and (if on redhat based system)
> /var/log/audit/audit.
> kwright@grace:/etc/dovecot/conf.d$ ls -la /var/run/dovecot/auth-client
> srw--- 1 dovecot root 0 Jan 4 19:09 /var/run/dovecot/auth-client
>
> I see /var/run/dovecot/auth-client only has read and write permissions
> for the owner and nothing for anyone else. Is this par
> Error: auth-client: conn unix:/var/run/dovecot/auth-client:
> connect(/var/run/dovecot/auth-client) failed: Permission denied
> (euid=1000(kwright) egid=1000(kwright) missing +r perm:
It might be failing you at the prompt because you are running doveadm as
kwright.
Try running the c
> user_query = SELECT maildir, 2000 AS uid, 2000 AS gid FROM mailbox
> WHERE username = '%u' AND active='1'
If you are using a static uid/gid it is not needed to have it include it in
queries.
You can set them in the config with:
mail_uid = 2000
mail_gid = 2000
And then shorten the query
Is Diffie-Hellman needed on a modern new dovecot setup?
ssl_dh is empty by default.
Both ssl_cert and ssl_key on my setup are pointing to let's encrypt certs.
However i see Diffie-Hellman related warnings in logs:
dovecot[1073]: imap-login: Error: Diffie-Hellman key exchange requested, b
And follow up question;
The docs say you are encouraged to disable non-ECC DH algorithms completely.
However i didn't see anything on that same page explaining how to go about
doing that.
Can someone point me to something explaining what that means and how to go
about doing it?
> I am running an older version of dovecott and would really like to
> upgrade it and there is no package for this linux version
Not sure what OS you are using, but in case you didn't know, dovecot maintains
their own repos for popular OS's allowing you to use your package man
lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox:
" If the recipient address includes a detail element / role (as in user+detail
format), save the message to the detail mailbox. "
Im not understanding this, what is the "detail mailbox"?
I tried testing this feature by setting "lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes" and
> That means, if there is a mailbox with the same name as the used detail
> extension, it will move that email there.
>
> In your example:
> Set "lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes".
> Create a mailbox with name "test" in user's postbox.
> Then send an email to and it will end up in
> mailbox "tes
> Create a mailbox with name "test" in user's postbox.
> Then send an email to and it will end up in
> mailbox "test" instead of INBOX.
I have noticed this is case-sensitive. If i create a folder "test" but someone
sends the email to "user+t...@example.com" it wont get sorted into the folder.
>> lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes
>> Is there anyway it make this feature case-insensitive?
> auth_username_format = %Lu
> might help...
> Aki
Im using the default for that setting and it shows it is already %Lu
[root dovecot]# doveconf -a auth_username_forma
> I would like to ask if it is an acceptable practice to manage messages in the
> maildir as a file (move them from one folder to another) while dovecot is in
> stop state thinking that it will be rebuild to the next imap user login
Acceptable? That is subjective. It is your sy
> On 01-25-2022 11:35 am, Marc wrote:
> 2. if you do not use separate users, everything is written under the same uid.
IMO: So what? What is the difference between a linux user vs a virtual user
permission wise? They are both equally unprivileged users. If dovecot can get
to them, virt
Storing mail in a db... at the end of the day isn't it still just a file (.db
file) on the drive?
Aren't you just adding bloat and complexity vs just storing the mail directly
(maildir format) to a file on the drive?
What do you think you are saving? Security?
If someone can read files on your s
> when dkim pass there is no breakage, but dkim fail can lead to in some setups
> to make reject, even for maillists
> that is a design fail on dkim
I disagree. DKIM is doing its job. It is a design fail on the part of most
mailing list and/or lack of user's DKIM signatures.
Look at it logical
Hi,
I'm currently debugging replication issues and I found that both servers
answer to a "dovecot --hostdomain" simply with
localhost
From what I've read, this can lead to problems.
Where do I configure the dovecot hostdomain name? The machine itself has
a valid n
you want them.
Restart dovecot. You may have to change the configuration to use the names just
created.
Dave Ryan
On 09/23/16 11:07, Darryl Baker wrote:
> My apologies if this is a repeat but my search of the archive did not turn
> it up in the recent past. If this has been covered just poi
luuk@opensuse:~/bin> doveadm quota recalc
luuk@opensuse:~/bin> doveadm quota recalc -u luuk
doveadm(luuk): Error: userdb lookup:
connect(/usr/local/var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb) failed: Connection refused
doveadm(luuk): Fatal: User lookup failed: Internal error occurred. Refer
to server log f
mand
works as well.
Any tip?
Running dovecot 2.2.13 on a pi/debian jessie
Thanks
not appear
under the "Shared"
Here is the config
-
# 2.2.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
auth_mechanisms = plain login
default_login_user = virmail
first_valid_gid = 5501
first_valid_uid = 5501
imap_client_workarounds = delay-newmail tb-extra-mailb
Hello Community,
I am currently facing the following:
- dovecot+postfix+sieve are running smoothly using passwd-file
authentication
- if a add a second authentication scheme (let's say mysql), I face a
problem with sieve:
-- receiving thru postfix is ok on both passwd-file and
wanting to do is get letsencrypt going for my email setup, the smtp
handled by postfix, but mail, and imap I believe are handled by
dovecot.
With the web it was easy just let apache serve the token that
letsencrypt needed and I got certificates. How do I do this with
regards email?
You can use certbo
Hi,
There is an article I've written recently and Iwanted to hear your
thoughts about it, please read it here http://example.wowcinema.com/6f6e
Best regards, dovecot
dovecot-2.2.28-1.el6_31.wing.x86_64
I've created this public shared namespace with
namespace public2 {
type = public
separator = .
prefix = Public2.
location =
maildir:/mail/public2:INDEX=/mail/%u/public:LAYOUT=fs:DIRNAME=.store
subscriptions = no
}
and I'm
> But what I would need is execute a global sieve_before for all users to
> apply some spam selection rules. Did anybody easily achieved it?
Is this what you are looking for? This is how I enforce spam rules prior to
users' custom scripts.
#in dovecot configuration
plugin {
s
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 07:29:15PM -0400, Bill Shirley wrote:
> Doesn't 'keep' imply 'stop'? What if your users want the email in a
> different folder that the INBOX?
>
> Leave the 'else' clause off.
It doesn't in this circumstance.
"For normal Sieve execution, "keep;" is equivalent to "filein
Trying to track down a dovecot issue
The error message is:
dovecot: auth-worker: Fatal: master: service(auth-worker): child X
killed with signal 11 (core not dumped - set service auth-worker {
drop_priv_before_exec=yes })
The setup is dovecot 2.2.29.1 with passwd and mysql auth
Trying to track down a dovecot issue
The error message is:
dovecot: auth-worker: Fatal: master: service(auth-worker): child X
killed with signal 11 (core not dumped - set service auth-worker {
drop_priv_before_exec=yes })
The setup is dovecot 2.2.29.1 with passwd and mysql auth
Still Trying to track down a dovecot issue
The error message is:
dovecot: auth-worker: Fatal: master: service(auth-worker): child X
killed with signal 11 (core not dumped - set service auth-worker {
drop_priv_before_exec=yes })
The setup is dovecot 2.2.29.1 with passwd and mysql
1 - 100 of 2484 matches
Mail list logo
