Replication between different versions of dovecot

2017-10-17 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
Hi, Can't find any notes about this in documentation. Is replication supposed to work between different versions of dovecot? I've just found that dovecot 2.2.33.1 was uploaded to debian unstable and it crashes on every replication with older dovecot 2.2.27. (version 2.2.32.1 was probably ok) Su

Re: Replication between different versions of dovecot

2017-10-17 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 09:45:32AM +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Hi! > > This is a issue that has been fixed in master, thank you for reporting. > > See > https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/187fbf157d5c42f9f06ce52884fefbb4f66c070d.patch Thanks a lot for path. But could you please state explicitl

Re: Replication between different versions of dovecot

2017-10-18 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 09:51:49AM +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/187fbf157d5c42f9f06ce52884fefbb4f66c070d.patch > > Thanks a lot for path. But could you please state explicitly, is such kind > > of replication (between different versions of dovecot) supported a

mdbox and shared \Seen flag

2016-04-09 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
Hi, I've just switched mail storage from maildir to mdbox and found it's very amazing. The only question I've is related to shared mailboxes. In the past I've had a few mailboxes that were shared between two users by just symlinking maildir. So everything was shared including flags and \Seen stat

Re: mdbox and shared \Seen flag

2016-04-09 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:47:47PM +0200, Thomas Leuxner wrote: > * Dmitry Nezhevenko 2016.04.09 19:38: > > > As far as I understand, "shared" namespace will keep \Seen flag private. > > So any suggestions how to make \Seen shared? > > This can be done using IN

fts-lucene with virtual folders

2016-04-12 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
Hi, It looks like I've found something strange. It looks like dovecot updates fts-lucene index every time I'm opening virtual folder that contains FTS query: indexer-worker(dion): Warning: fts-lucene: Settings have changed, rebuilding index for mailbox dovecot-virtual is pretty simple:

Re: fts-lucene with virtual folders

2016-04-12 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:05:08AM +0300, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like I've found something strange. It looks like dovecot > updates fts-lucene index every time I'm opening virtual folder that > contains FTS query: > > indexer-worker(dion): War

Re: fts-lucene with virtual folders

2016-04-12 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:26:05AM +0300, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:05:08AM +0300, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: > > indexer-worker(dion): Warning: fts-lucene: Settings have changed, > > rebuilding index for mailbox > The root issue is that fts_lucene

Re: fts-lucene with virtual folders

2016-04-13 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:40:55PM +0300, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: > > This proof-of-concept patch fixes issue for me. I don't think that this is > right way to fix it. I've copied vname calculation code from > fts_index_have_compatible_settings. Maybe it's better

fts-lucene crashes on dovecot-2.2.24

2016-05-16 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
Hi, I've tried to upgrade to dovecot 2.2.24. It seems that lucene reindex issue should be fixed. But instead of this dovecot indexer-worker crashes very often for me. I'm attaching backtrace. Please let me know if you need backtrace from binary without optimizations. -- WBR, Dmitry #0 rescan_

[Dovecot] zlib plugin doesn't read concatenated .gz mailbox

2011-07-29 Thread Dmitry Nezhevenko
Hi, I've observed that dovecot doesn't displays all mails from compressed via gzip mailbox (mbox). At the same time "mutt -f mailbox.gz" displays it correctly with all messages. I'm using archivemail to archive old mails. Internally it creates new "gzip" archive with "expired" messages and then c