On 8/19/2011 10:49 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 8/17/11 7:42 AM, Adrian Ulrich wrote:
I read that XFS is a good choice, but is not
too reliable...
Are you using Maildir or MBOX?
In any case: XFS would be my last choice:
XFS is nice if you are working with large files (> 2GB), but
for E-Mail i
A little OT - but I've seen a few opinions voiced here by various admins
and I'd like to benefit.
Currently running a single combined server for multiple operations -
fileserver, mailserver, webserver, virtual server, and whatever else
pops up. Current incarnation of the machine, after the la
On 8/31/2011 12:41 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
On 8/30/2011 5:43 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
A little OT - but I've seen a few opinions voiced here by various admins
and I'd like to benefit.
RAID-10 is fine (note that the default mdadm RAID10 isn't actually
RAID10, but it wo
Using Dovecot 2.0, LDAP userdb & passdb, with prefetch:
hosts = myhost.mydomain
dn = cn=x,cn=y
dnpass = xyz123
auth_bind = yes
auth_bind_userdn = uid=%n,ou=users,dc=x
ldap_version = 3
base = ou=Users, dc=x
user_attrs = =home=/var/mail/%d/%n, \
=mail=mdbox:/var/mail/%d/%n/mdbox, \
=uid=vma
On 10/6/2011 8:38 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Using Dovecot 2.0, LDAP userdb & passdb, with prefetch:
[..]
I have added permissions for "$allshared" to a mailbox's Inbox. It
does not appear in the shared folders list. Other mailboxes, with
explicit permission for a g
On 10/7/2011 11:08 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 10/6/2011 8:38 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Using Dovecot 2.0, LDAP userdb & passdb, with prefetch:
[..]
I have added permissions for "$allshared" to a mailbox's Inbox. It
does not appear in the shared folders list. Ot
Does "doveadm index -A INBOX" reindex everything? What about users with
multiple folders, both subbed & not subbed under INBOX?
--
Daniel
On 12/20/2011 2:18 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 19:27 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Does "doveadm index -A INBOX" reindex everything? What about users with
multiple folders, both subbed& not subbed under INBOX?
It indexes INBOX (only) for all users. And it do
For a single server, is the Lucene backend now "better" than running a
Solr server?
--
Daniel
Is "break-imap-search" still required using 2.1 with Solr to index TEXT
& BODY searches?
--
Daniel
I thought I had cleared out the corruption I had before - perhaps I was
mistaken. What steps should I take to help locate these issues?
Currently using 2.1rc1. I see the following errors in my logs,
including out of memory and message size issues (at 15:30):
Jan 4 05:17:17 bubba dovecot: i
On 1/6/2012 2:57 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2012, at 12.55, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Jan 4 05:17:17 bubba dovecot: master: Error: service(indexer-worker): child
10896 returned error 83 (Out of memory (vsz_limit=256 MB, you may need to
increase it))
Jan 4 06:17:17 bubba dovecot: indexer-wor
Solr plugin appears to break when mailbox names have an ampersand in the
name. The messages appear to indicate '&' gets translated to '&--'.
--
Daniel
On 1/6/2012 9:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2012, at 19.30, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Jan 6 09:22:42 bubba dovecot: indexer-worker(us...@domain.com): Error:
fts_solr: Indexing failed: 400 Illegal character ((CTRL-CHAR, code 18)) at
[row,col {unknown-source}]: [482765,16]
Jan 6 09:22:42
On 1/6/2012 12:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/6/2012 9:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2012, at 19.30, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Jan 6 09:22:42 bubba dovecot: indexer-worker(us...@domain.com):
Error: fts_solr: Indexing failed: 400 Illegal character ((CTRL-CHAR,
code 18)) at [row,col
On 1/8/2012 3:40 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/6/2012 12:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/6/2012 9:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2012, at 19.30, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Jan 8 15:40:09 bubba dovecot: imap(us...@domain.com): Error:
fts_solr: Lookup failed: 400 undefined field CC
On 1/9/2012 7:00 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 9.1.2012, at 1.48, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/8/2012 3:40 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/6/2012 12:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/6/2012 9:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2012, at 19.30, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Jan 8 15:40:09 bubba
On 1/24/2012 8:35 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote:
Here is my dovecot config:
plugin {
quota = maildir:User Quota
quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M
}
[..]
So it picks up my set quota of 3MB but dovecot is not rejecting emails
if I am over my quota.
Can anyone help?
Is the quota plugi
On 1/25/2012 1:39 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote:
On 2012-01-25 05:38, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/24/2012 8:35 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote:
Here is my dovecot config:
plugin {
quota = maildir:User Quota
quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M
}
[..]
So it picks up my set quota of 3MB
On 1/25/2012 2:01 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote:
On 2012-01-25 05:38, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/24/2012 8:35 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote:
Here is my dovecot config:
plugin {
quota = maildir:User Quota
quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M
}
[..]
So it picks up my set quota of 3MB
Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using
Thunderbird. I see the following in the log:
Jan 25 15:36:22 bubba dovecot: imap(dmil...@amfes.com): Panic: file
mailbox-list-fs.c: line 156 (fs_list_get_path): assertion failed:
(mailbox_list_is_valid_pattern(_list, name))
Jan
On 1/25/2012 3:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 26.1.2012, at 1.37, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using Thunderbird.
I see the following in the log:
Dovecot version?
2.1.rc3. I'm compiling rc5 now...
--
Daniel
On 1/25/2012 3:43 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/25/2012 3:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 26.1.2012, at 1.37, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using
Thunderbird. I see the following in the log:
Dovecot version?
2.1.rc3. I'm comp
On 1/25/2012 4:04 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/25/2012 3:43 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/25/2012 3:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 26.1.2012, at 1.37, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using
Thunderbird. I see the following in the log
On 2/12/2012 1:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/rc/dovecot-2.1.rc6.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/rc/dovecot-2.1.rc6.tar.gz.sig
I've finally finished all of my email backlog. If you haven't received an
answer to some question/bugreport, resend the mail.
This
On 2/13/2012 7:00 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 14.2.2012, at 4.54, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
With this configure line:
./configure --with-ldap --with-bzlip --with-zlib --with-solr --with-lucene
lucene-wrapper.cc:23: fatal error: CLucene.h: No such file or directory
Base on this error, I suppose
As the Boehm GC is an available option, do I take that to mean it's
beneficial for some users but not most?
--
Daniel
On 2/12/2012 9:00 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 12.2.2012, at 15.27, Mike Constabel wrote:
Another Question to this Option:
# tb-extra-mailbox-sep:
# With mbox storage a mailbox can contain either mails or submailboxes,
# but not both. Thunderbird separates these two by forcing s
On 2/14/2012 12:06 PM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
On 2/13/2012 8:34 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I'm fighting the same issue. With the current release (2.1rc6) no errors
are logged - but I'm having problems deleted folders from trash. I've
enabled tb-extra-mailbox-sep. Two fo
On 2/14/2012 4:42 PM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:40 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 2/14/2012 12:06 PM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
On 2/13/2012 8:34 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I'm fighting the same issue. With the current release (2.1rc6) no
errors
are logged - but I
What did I do wrong to make this happen? "doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com):
Debug: fts: Indexes disabled for namespace 'shared/%n/'"
doveadm -D fts rescan -u dmil...@amfes.com
doveadm(root): Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot
doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded:
/usr/local
On 2/24/2012 10:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 25.2.2012, at 8.09, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
What did I do wrong to make this happen? "doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com): Debug: fts:
Indexes disabled for namespace 'shared/%n/'"
That's intentional. "shared/%n/" nam
On 4/5/2012 5:59 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-04-05 4:18 AM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> Also with 2.x you may want to use LMTP rather than the LDA Piping.
>
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP
I am preparing to convert my main client's postfix_courier-imap setup
to dovecot 2.
On 4/6/2012 1:00 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-04-06 2:53 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I'm currently using Postfix 2.7, Dovecot 2.1, and the Dovecot LDA. I
have a pure virtual user environment stored in LDAP. My messages include
X-Original-To and Delivered-To headers.
Well that is
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 14:30:38 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Apr
2012 11:06:48 -0700
> Daniel L. Miller articulated:
>
>> Unfortunately,
the docs for the ltmp agent http://www.postfix.org/lmtp.8.html [1] don't
say anything about adding these headers. I tried asking
On 8/13/2010 6:07 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 17:04 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
If we can't get clients to agree on a "standard" set of folders
(probably reasonably safe assumption)
[...]
I'm kind of annoyed with listescape though. Hopefully for v
Was there a doveadm command that checks the SIS files and removes any
not referenced? Will the "doveadm purge -A" catch that?
--
Daniel
Is there a way to manually force an mdbox storage to be rebuilt into new
files? Particularly files of the maximum size?
--
Daniel
Having a problem with a mailbox. I've been trying to rebuild - but
doveadm force-resync crashes. This is mdbox with sis.
doveadm purge -u dmil...@amfes.com
doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com): Panic: file istream.c: line 466
(i_stream_grow_buffer): assertion failed: (stream->max_buffer_size > 0)
dovea
On 4/30/2012 1:16 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Having a problem with a mailbox. I've been trying to rebuild - but
doveadm force-resync crashes. This is mdbox with sis.
Here's a backtrace -
gdb --args doveadm force-resync -u msie...@amfes.com Sent
GNU gdb (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.2-1ubu
I have isolated the corruption in a mailbox to 4 mdbox files. Two of
these (smaller) files cause the force-resync to report a breakage and
save the file as m.XX.broken. The other two (larger) files cause a crash.
Is there a way I can fix these files and recover the mails?
--
Daniel
On 5/4/2012 10:14 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 30.4.2012, at 23.16, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Having a problem with a mailbox. I've been trying to rebuild - but doveadm
force-resync crashes. This is mdbox with sis.
doveadm purge -u dmil...@amfes.com
doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com): Panic:
With an error like this:
doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com): Error: Corrupted dbox file
/var/mail/amfes.com/dmiller/mdbox/storage/m.20 (around offset=74408):
Unexpected EOF while reading metadata header
What can be done?
--
Daniel
On 4/30/2012 5:23 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:43 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Is there a way to manually force an mdbox storage to be rebuilt into new
files? Particularly files of the maximum size?
You could do it with dsync.
dsync seems to do a marvelous job - new
On 5/6/2012 8:09 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 4/30/2012 5:23 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:43 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Is there a way to manually force an mdbox storage to be rebuilt into
new
files? Particularly files of the maximum size?
You could do it with
On 5/6/2012 8:12 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 5/6/2012 8:09 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 4/30/2012 5:23 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:43 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Is there a way to manually force an mdbox storage to be rebuilt
into new
files? Particularly files
I'm not sure what's triggered it - I THINK it has something to do with a
force-resync, but not sure.
I'm no longer viewing my full list of shared mailboxes. I used to have
a number of users shown - they had all had their ACL's set individually
and were shown in the list. "doveadm acl debug"
On 5/6/2012 8:34 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I'm not sure what's triggered it - I THINK it has something to do with
a force-resync, but not sure.
I'm no longer viewing my full list of shared mailboxes. I used to
have a number of users shown - they had all had their ACL'
On 5/7/2012 6:46 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 5/6/2012 8:34 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I'm not sure what's triggered it - I THINK it has something to do
with a force-resync, but not sure.
I'm no longer viewing my full list of shared mailboxes. I used to
have a number
On 5/7/2012 11:02 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.5.2012, at 16.52, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Ok - I broke it again. Tried changing mail_shared_explicit_inbox to no -
problem mailboxes disappeared again. Changed back to yes - they came back.
Problem with both Thunderbird and Roundcube as
On 5/7/2012 12:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.5.2012, at 22.13, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 5/7/2012 11:02 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.5.2012, at 16.52, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Ok - I broke it again. Tried changing mail_shared_explicit_inbox to no -
problem mailboxes disappeared again
On 5/7/2012 1:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.5.2012, at 23.27, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.5.2012, at 23.15, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So user1& user3 are missing entirely. If it "breaks" using the old style, then I
would see user 2& 4 inboxes - but not user 1& 3. I also have other folders s
On 5/10/2012 10:02 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
I am getting an SELinux error every time dovecot starts, because it is
trying to access my music directory (/srv/music). I've read the
doveadm-mount man page, and tried:
doveadm mount add /srv/music ignore
but it didn't make any difference.
Now, I
On 9/16/2010 5:41 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 20:25 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Other than license issues, is there an advantage to using gnutls vs
openssl? Or is openssl superior - at least in the current implementations?
Dovecot's GNUTLS support was written long
When something "bad" happens to the indexes, my e-mail client
(Thunderbird) reports an "unable to succeed" error on opening a
mailbox. Leaving that mailbox and coming back works fine. Is this
expected behaviour?
--
Daniel
To be more specific:
Alert
The current command did not succeed. The mail server responded:
Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information.
[timestamp]
--
Daniel
Scott Silva wrote:
on 12/31/2007 10:54 AM Daniel L. Miller spake the following:
When something "bad" happens to the indexes, my e-mail client
(Thunderbird) reports an "unable to succeed" error on opening a
mailbox. Leaving that mailbox and coming back works fine. Is this
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 10:54 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
When something "bad" happens to the indexes, my e-mail client
(Thunderbird) reports an "unable to succeed" error on opening a
mailbox. Leaving that mailbox and coming back works fine
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 09:55 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 10:54 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
When something "bad" happens to the indexes, my e-mail client
(Thunderbird) reports an "unable to su
Does 1.1 support multiple certs?
--
Daniel
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On May 20, 2008, at 2:07 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
Is there a straightforward way to disallow the deletion of all IMAP
mailboxes?
I have a user who's deleted an important IMAP mailbox and I'm now
recovering a recent copy from the backup. But I'd rather just blanket
disa
Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Wednesday, June 11 at 05:01 PM, quoth Hugo Monteiro:
Have you tried the plugin using the mailtrain backend?
The antispam plugin? No, I haven't... mostly because it looks like no
matter which backend I use, I'd have to alter the user-visible
interface to my training sys
Charles Marcus wrote:
Hello,
Well, I have a brain-dead user (using Thunderbird 2.0.0.14) who just
won't listen when I tell them not to try to move 5000+ messages at one
time (or if deleting, bypass the Trash), and they managed to royally
screw up their maildirs...
It's never bothered me - tho
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc12.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc12.tar.gz.sig
Sorry, one more RC because of the mbox+quota bug. v1.1.0 still planned
for tomorrow.
- mbox: Don't give "Can't find next message offset" warning
Wolfram Schlich wrote:
Has anyone already built 1.1.1 packages for Ubuntu 8.04?!
Thanks,
Wolfram
The Debian maintainers are currently reviewing 1.1.x - they're looking
to determine if 1.1.x should be considered stable enough for inclusion
in their next release ("Lenny") or wait'll the next
Zhang Huangbin wrote:
Hi, all.
I just upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.1.1 in a test box(RHEL 5.2, x86_64).
after upgrade, i got this warning msg:
8<
# /etc/init.d/dovecot restart
Stopping Dovecot Imap: [ OK ]
Starting Dovecot Imap: Warning: fd limit 1024
Stephan Bosch wrote:
Hello Dovecot users,
I have formulated a new release that addresses an important
ManageSieve compilation issue that arises when compiling with GCC 4.3
(as used by the new Debian Lenny).
Sorry for being slightly off-topic - but if you change your code to be
compliant with
I know I could test this - but I'd rather ask first. To my knowledge,
we haven't come up with a good server-side implementation for savings
copies of sent messages (by all means correct my ignorance in this
regard). So the typical way is to enable it in clients like Thunderbird
(this prompted
Patrick Nagel wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:38:19 -0700, "Daniel L. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
My understanding is that sending a message from a client (use
Thunderbird for simplicity of this conversation) is performed via SMTP.
Saving a copy into a sent fol
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Daniel L. Miller escreveu:
The question: can Dovecot be configured to support sieve filters on
IMAP (not just SMTP) operations (Eduardo helped me here - so I'll
specifically ask about the APPEND command).
If not , I'll make that a feature-request -
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Daniel L. Miller escreveu:
So, without changing the MUA/MTA/IMAP interaction, the IMAP server
will simply file new messages according to user-set rules. Doesn't
address the multiple-transfer issue at all, but does provide an
option for centralized contr
Anders Melchiorsen wrote:
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
First - I can't argue the point about BCC'ing - you're certainly
correct that that would be the "simplest" solution in terms of
immediate implementation - if we assume users are willing to change
their habits. Sinc
Stephan Bosch wrote:
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
The question: can Dovecot be configured to support sieve filters on
IMAP (not just SMTP) operations (Eduardo helped me here - so I'll
specifically ask about the APPEND command).
It is quite funny that you bring this up right now, becau
I've seen a number of posts discussing NFS based storage and issues with
Dovecot. When the term "NFS" is used - does this exclusively refer to
the Linux NFS network file system, or is it a generic reference to any
network file system? I don't recall seeing any posts referencing issues
with CI
Jordan Hayes wrote:
I'll note that I'm using procmail because of the ability to filter
and run SpamAssassin from it.
Typically you'd run SpamAssassin first and Dovecot deliver after that.
Is anyone here doing this for virtual users who could describe what
they did?
Bonus points for actual
Harondel J. Sibble wrote:
On 11 Aug 2008 at 8:24, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
How are you calling deliver in postfix? Do you see in postfix's logs the
messages being handled to deliver?
Hmm, oddly enough, adding a .forward in the users home dir with
| "/usr/libexec/dovecot/del
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:37:11PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
One thing that would be nice, that pretty much no webmail does, is to
keep a stateful connection open all the time (or at least some of the
time) instead of creating tons of short-lived connections that ask
Stephen Feyrer wrote:
Hi Everyone.
Ooops I just broke my dovecot install.
I've looked through the mailing list archives and not found anything
relevant.
When I try to connect to my mail server I get this message.
"Could not connect to mail server chen.home.org; connection was refused"
T
Stephen Feyrer wrote:
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Stephen Feyrer wrote:
Hi Everyone.
Ooops I just broke my dovecot install.
I've looked through the mailing list archives and not found anything
relevant.
When I try to connect to my mail server I get this message.
"Could not conne
Mike Henry wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry if this question has been posted before. I have dug through the
archives but haven't found any relevant answers to this question.
I am running Dovecot on a server that serves a number of (virtual)
domains each with a number of (virtual) users.
To read mail I
This may have been asked before - if so I apologize.
Some mail clients - like Thunderbird - can provide a virtual folder or
"saved search" to provide a list of mails that match certain criteria.
Obviously, unless special client-side caching is implemented - which
Thunderbird (my own client of
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.5.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.5.tar.gz.sig
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha3.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha3.tar.gz.sig
A combined release announcement
Stewart Dean wrote:
Dave McGuire wrote:
On Oct 29, 2008, at 3:42 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
What is the best way to do a (server-side) backup of all mail in a
user's mail?
I usually just rsync the /home directories to another server. The
inital sync
can take a while, but it gets faster after ther
I don't if this has been discussed before - or already implemented - but
it would be great if I could define one or more "aliases" for a folder.
A particular example might be "Sent" where different (badly-written)
clients might have hard-coded "Sent" folder locations like "Sent", "Sent
Items",
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I don't if this has been discussed before - or already implemented -
but it would be great if I could define one or more "aliases" for a
folder. A particular e
What options are available for remote storage, i.e. storage devices
directly mounted on the machine running Dovecot? I've seen discussions
of NFS usage - but my experiences with NFS in times past have been
poor. CIFS has worked well for me for non-mail use - would this be
suitable? Or is the
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
What options are available for remote storage, i.e. storage devices
directly mounted on the machine running Dovecot? I've seen
discussions of NFS usage - but my experiences with NFS in times past
have been poor. CIFS has worked well for me for non-mail use -
I see the following history in my log during message delivery:
Mar 1 13:35:09 mailserver postfix/pickup[21464]: 5FAFC2A002: uid=0
from=
Mar 1 13:35:09 mailserver postfix/cleanup[21526]: 5FAFC2A002:
message-id=<20090301213509.5fafc2a...@mailserver.amfeslan.local>
Mar 1 13:35:09 mailserver pos
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 07:31 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Mar 1 13:35:10 mailserver deliver(dmil...@amfes.com):
fdatasync_path(/var/mail/amfes.com/dmiller/Maildir/INBOX/dbox-Mails)
failed: Invalid argument
Some OSes/filesystems don't like that. This should
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 08:59 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Some OSes/filesystems don't like that. This should help:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/71b7c7f8d7a2
1st question...hmm...wow. Is that a patch you just wrote?! Cool!
Hmm...since I'
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:42 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
With dbox yes, you can just ignore the error. Maildir probably would
give user-visible errors.
Why the difference? I can see a big deal for mbox - but why Maildir?
It's just because of ho
Ok - at this time I am using the following non-default settings:
Samba server - smb.conf
[Mailstorage]
ea support = Yes
use sendfile = Yes
fake oplocks = Yes
delete readonly = Yes
Dovecot - dovecot.conf
mmap_disable = yes
dotlock_use_excl = yes
fsync_disable = yes
lock_me
Ok - I gave up on trying to get CIFS to work - there's obviously stuff
going on I don't understand. So - instead of trying to get a virtual
server to work, I next tried a chroot. That worked...but imapsync
error'ed out trying to handle one of my large mailboxes.
I was trying to setup a "new" se
Ok...I made the leap. Compiled a copy of 1.2b4 (very pleasant compile
BTW - almost no warnings, nice code Timo!)...tweaked a config...had a
few false starts...
1.2b4 seems to working quite nicely. Now...for my next magical trick...
I would like to migrate from maildir to dbox. I've tried us
Since I'm going to make a change to my folder structure, what would be
recommended so I can avoid the need in the future?
All my mail users are virtual - they have no existence in /etc/passwd,
nor do they have folders under /home. At this time, all mail is being
delivered to maildir:/var/mail
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Since I'm going to make a change to my folder structure, what would be
recommended so I can avoid the need in the future?
All my mail users are virtual - they have no existence in /etc/passwd,
nor do they have folders under /home. At this time, all mail is
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I thought so. Now I have seen, read and understood (so far)
http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Exim.
However I do not see any examples for configuring dovecot for dbox. Is it as
easy as s/maildir/dbox/g in the following:
mail_location =
maildir:/var/spool/virtual/%d/%n/Maildi
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
One last question: Can dbox co-exist with Maildir?
Depends on what you mean by "co-exist". It is possible to define
per-user mail storage within the userdb. It is also possible (I
believe) to have multiple namespaces, and the mailstorage can be
different for eac
I can see where large mailservers would benefit from significant write
performance increases - but unless the server is being actively limited
by the local delivery agent, what other performance benefits does this
offer?
In particular, is there any increase in READ performance by using dbox?
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:34 -0700, James Butler wrote:
How can I add an extension to Dovecot's Sieve implementation?
I would like to use 'editheader' and 'redirect'.
I'm not really sure what you mean. editheader isn't implemented,
although Konstantin is apparently
1 - 100 of 297 matches
Mail list logo
