All,
Just ran into issue with the latest Thunderbird release today,
version 45.0. This version will no longer login to our dovecot 1.2.17
version. I now this is old version but wanting to know if there is
anyone finding a solution to this?
Right now our work around is to reinstall Thunde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm testing out dovecot with postfix. I'm running postfix 2.5.2 with
dovecot version 1.1.1 with dovecot sieve plugin version 1.1.5.
I have everything compiled and working except for the sieve plugin. I'm
now trying to test out the sieve pl
: Effective uid=10946, gid=32,
home=/top/admin/ENS/people/cjay/home
Aug 4 13:25:22 mail2.engr.colostate.edu dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.info]
IMAP(cjay): mbox:
data=/top/admin/ENS/people/cjay/home/:INBOX=/userM/mail/cjay
Aug 4 13:25:22 mail2.engr.colostate.edu dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.info]
IMAP(cjay):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm at a loss here. Details of my setup:
OS: Solaris 10
gcc version: 3.4.3
postfix version 2.5.2
dovecot version 1.1.2
dovecot sieve version 1.1.5
How I installed:
Postfix:
make makefiles CCARGS='-DUSE_SASL_AUTH
\-DDEF_SERVER_SASL_TYPE=\"dovecot\"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Giving up on the sieve plugin and switching to procmail. I found the
following link:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/procmail
This site doesn't saying anything about needing to modify the procmail
source code like here:
http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot
Guys, I'm running out of hair to pull out ;).
Can anyone out there say that this does work?? To me this is looking
like a bug and I'm not sure whether it's the sieve plugin or the dovecot
deliver program. I have also had no luck the the "reject" sending any
reply back to the sender.
My setup:
O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry if this comes in twice, I sent this first from my test account.
- -
Guys, I'm running out of hair to pull out ;).
Can anyone out there say that this does work?? To me this is looking
like a bug and I'm not sure whether it's the sieve
ails: rule=notspam policy=default score=0
spamscore=0 ipsco
re=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0
reason=mlx e
ngine=5.0.0-080509 definitions=main-0808060075
X-UID: 33
Status: RO
X-Keywords:
Content-Length: 33
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2008, at 1:57 PM,
to me? that is, is my address
in the [Resent]-To, [Resent]-Cc or [Resent]-Bcc fields? */
But I haven't pin-pointed yet why it's not seeing the message as being
for me??
CJ Keist wrote:
> Timo,
> I removed the ${1} variable but still no luck. I read the reasons
> wh
but I what I have done to get around
this is to hard code in the engr2.colostate.edu domain in the sieve
plugin and recompiled. Is there something I could do in the dovecot.conf
file to fix this? Anyway, it is now sending the vacation reply!
This should not be a problem once I move it over to o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In working with auto vacation replies I'd like to do a sieve script as
follows:
require ["vacation"];
vacation
:days 30
:addresses "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
:subject "Out of Office"
"* Out of Office **
I'm away -- send mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan,
Thank you, didn't realize how buggy the libphp-sieve was. It does
compile fine with sievec.
Stephan Bosch wrote:
> CJ Keist wrote:
>> In working with auto vacation replies I'd like to do a sieve script as
>&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry to bring this up again.
I have now configured my test server to pass all email messages off to
our central campus email filter gateway. This gateway scans all email
traffic for viruses/spam before being delivered to any local mail servers.
Once
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fixed it!!
In the file src/sieve_cmu.c line 744:
smtp_client = smtp_client_open(src->addr, NULL, &f);
change to:
smtp_client = smtp_client_open(src->addr, src->fromaddr, &f);
CJ Keist wrote:
> Sorry to bring this up ag
out a valid from address in the headers.
I will forward this on to our central IT guys that maintain the email
gateway, but I don't hold much hope that they will listen ;).
Stephan Bosch wrote:
> CJ Keist schreef:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josef,
This is exactly same situation in our environment as well. I had to
make the same change as you stated. Our central virus/spam email
gateway also cans any message with out a valid from address in the mail
headers. I would think most virus/s
de back to the original state.
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 8/12/2008, CJ Keist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I understand what you are saying in trying to keep a
>> vicious cycle of auto-replies responding to each other. But in our
>> environment I don't have any ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just switched over to dovecot 1.1.2 on our live system last night. I'm
seeing the following errors in the logs:
Aug 19 10:01:03 goku dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.crit] Panic: IMAP(elevin):
file in
dex-sync.c: line 39 (index_mailbox_set_recent_uid): asse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I believe the is the fix I did to the 1.1.2 source code:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/65d1fc48224d
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 8/19/2008, CJ Keist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I just switched over to dovecot 1.1.2 on our live sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With the sieve plugin trying to redirect or send vacation reply I'm
getting the following error:
Aug 19 13:12:52 goku deliver(joeblow): [ID 619685 mail.info] Module
loaded: /use
rM/mail-services/dovecot/lib/dovecot/lda/lib90_cmusieve_plugin.so
Aug 19
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Never mind On this, operator dumbness involved. Two directories above
didn't allow general access into postfix home.
-
With the sieve plugin trying to redirect or send vacation reply I'm
getting the following error:
Aug 19 13:1
://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/65d1fc48224d
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 8/19/2008, CJ Keist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I just switched over to dovecot 1.1.2 on our live system last night.
>
> What version were you on before (might tell Timo something)?
>
- --
C. J. Keist
I haven't heard anything on this bug. Is this a bug? I'm using dovecot
1.1.2 with the following patch applied:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/d674c05d725d
Another section from my logs. I know the backtrace is just numbers, let
me know how to compile to get more useful information if y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao,
I'm new to dovecot, just a week into switching over from UW-Imap, so
take my word with caution. We use SpuirrelMail, 1.4.15, and not seeing
any problems. Have you configured your folder defaults with
squirrellMail? Namely Option 1. "Default
yesterday.
I will keep an eye on it, and try to find a user that I know I can
work with that is getting the error.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 16:27 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
>> I haven't heard anything on this bug. Is this a bug? I'm using dovecot
>>
)
At that point I get the assertion error in the log files. I'm three for
three so far doing this way. Though this could be normal for first time
creating the index files in .imap?
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 16:27 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
>> I haven't heard a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lauri,
This is a known bug. You can search the dovecot mailing list for
"assertion". I'm running on Solaris 10 and see the same errors. So far
it doesn't look to be causing my users any problems. I also did apply
the patch:
http://hg.dovecot.or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Another wrinkle with vacation replies. I have user forwarding their
mail from one domain to our mail server with the vacation reply set.
Here is the dovecot script file:
require ["fileinto", "vacation"];
# BEGIN VACATION
vacation
:days
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Disregard this.
The user had a type-o in his email address for the domainB part!!
Sorry for the noise.
CJ Keist wrote:
> Hello,
>Another wrinkle with vacation replies. I have user forwarding their
> mail from one domain to our mail se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo,
24hrs, and no errors so far. Thanks so much for the fix!!!
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The bug was completely elsewhere than I thought. I was just about to
> send a debug patch for some of you to test, but immediately after that I
> managed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Looks like I'm still getting some errors:
Sep 2 10:42:03 goku dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.crit] Panic:
IMAP(brickner): file index-mail.c: line 1091 (index_mail_close):
assertion failed: (!mail->data.destroying_stream)
Is this same bug?
Timo Sirainen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I planning to upgrade from 1.1.2 dovecot to 1.1.3, that is if most
people feel the 1.1.3 is more stable now than 1.1.2? I've downloaded
the code and been going through and applying all the changes listed at
the URL below:
feed://hg.dovecot.org/doveco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Running Dovecot 1.1.3 and after dovecot has been running for awhile it
will just stop authenticating. Only fix is to stop and restart dovecot.
Here is the errors in the logs:
ct 4 09:34:32 goku dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.info] auth-worker(default):
p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo,
Thanks. Is there a good rule of thumb of what value I should put in
for this? The http://wiki.dovecot.org/MainConfig doesn't talk about
this config parameter.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Oct 4, 2008, at 6:53 PM, CJ Keist wrote:
&g
d love
to hear it.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 08:53 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
> Timo,
>Thanks. Is there a good rule of thumb of what value I should put in
> for this?
>
>> The lower it is, the more CPU Dovecot uses by restarting the
>> dovecot-aut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone out there know of a tool that can convert a Cyrus MailDir format
to Dovecot mbox? I have a user that I need to move over from a mail
server running cyrus using MailDir format. At first I told him to setup
second account with Thunderbird to our
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2008, at 6:04 PM, CJ Keist wrote:
>
>> Anyone out there know of a tool that can convert a Cyrus MailDir format
>> to Dovecot mbox? I have a user that I need to move over from a mail
>> server running cyrus using MailDir format. At first I told h
inen wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 15:02 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Timo,
>> Thanks. The cyrus2dovecot looks to have worked. So if I understand
>> the process I now just move the MailDir folder that
the users only way to access their Maildir folder would be
through a mail client.
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 10/9/2008, CJ Keist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> The built in convert plugin
>> with dovecot was not able to do it. I believe due to the fact that this
>> guy has fol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Have a strange problem with just POP3 users. Their email clients will
fail every so often with the following:
Logging into POP Server, PASS [09:16:29 PM]
There has been an error transferring your mail. I said PASS and then the POP server
([EMAIL P
I'm trying to compile 1.1.8 with dovecot-1-1-989789b2afd8 patches
applied on Solaris 10 sparc using gcc 2.95.3 and also tried version
3.4.3. This is error I'm getting:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I../../src/lib-auth
-DPKG_RUNDIR=\""/userM/mail-services/dovecot/var/run/d
ODULES(SSL, openssl)'
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 09:55 -0700, CJ Keist wrote:
I'm trying to compile 1.1.8 with dovecot-1-1-989789b2afd8 patches
applied on Solaris 10 sparc using gcc 2.95.3 and also tried version
3.4.3. This is error I'm getting:
..
ssl-proxy-op
Thanks,
Just got it to compile cleanly by adding --with-ssl=/opt/csw/ssl
instead of using the Solaris GNU packages in /usr/sfw.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 10:25 -0700, CJ Keist wrote:
Thanks,
Running autogen.sh I get:
% ./autogen.sh
configure.in:16: warning: macro
I have quick question related to patches. When you say this patch fixes
something, is it related to just 1.1.9 or is it for any 1.1.x version of
dovecot?
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 14:45 +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Timo.
You wrote 26 января 2009 г., 04:12:23:
On S
I'm working on bring up a new mail server to replace our current one.
Our current mail server is running dovecot 1.1.16, with postfix using
mbox format. User inboxes are stored locally on the mail server and all
other mail folders in users home directory under mail which is NFS
mounted on the
All,
Thanks for all the information. I think I'm leaning towards
locally attached fiber disk array. Couple of advantages I see, one it
will be faster than NFS, second it will allow us to separate user home
directory disk quotas and email disk quotas. Something we have been
wanting to do
If there is a separate sieve mailing list let me know. But have question
if someone else has done this or not.
Right now I have web form people use to setup their vacation replies
using Sieve (1.1.6). The form alows them to set what they want their
reply address to be, whether to send the r
I have dovecot 1.1.16 running on Solaris 10. We are seeing problem with
lock files taking forever to be removed after opening a email folder
like Trash with several thousand messages in them. We use mbox format.
All users inbox's are local to the mail server, and all other users mail
folder
Yes, I'm talking about Trash.lock files, not seeing any errors in the
log files related with lock files.
Yes, I am using dovecot deliver. So does that mean I should not set
mbox_very_dirty_syncs to yes?
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:55 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
I
they
are async mounts.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 10:07 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
Okay,
I think I got a test that can recreate the .lock file staying around
so long. I have trash folder with about 3500 messages in it. I went in
and deleted two messages from the Trash folder.
Quick question,
Have dovecot 1.1.16. Does Dovecot's POP handle sub folders?
--
C. J. Keist Email: cj.ke...@colostate.edu
UNIX/Network ManagerPhone: 970-491-0630
Engineering Network ServicesFax: 970-491-5569
College of Engineering, CSU
Ft. Collins, CO 80
All,
Just move our mail servers over to a new mail server running postfix
2.11.1 and dovecot 2.2.13 and getting the subject line errors in my
/var/adm/files. People are complaining of loosing their connections to
the mail server.
I've been able to google this error but haven't found fix fo
Added info: These errors seem to come from users using mbox format.
On 7/10/14, 9:04 AM, CJ Keist wrote:
All,
Just move our mail servers over to a new mail server running postfix
2.11.1 and dovecot 2.2.13 and getting the subject line errors in my
/var/adm/files. People are complaining of
Another problem is people are getting error message from their clients
stating they have exceeded their number of connections.
On 7/10/14, 9:09 AM, CJ Keist wrote:
Added info: These errors seem to come from users using mbox format.
On 7/10/14, 9:04 AM, CJ Keist wrote:
All,
Just move
port = 993
ssl = yes
}
}
service pop3-login {
inet_listener pop3 {
port = 110
}
inet_listener pop3s {
port = 995
ssl = yes
}
}
ssl_cert =
Am 10.07.2014 17:32, schrieb CJ Keist:
Another problem is people are getting error message from their clients stating
they have exce
, 9:50 AM, CJ Keist wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I have seen threads about setting the
mail_max_userip_connections, I have set this to 5000 and still people
getting the exceeding connections errorl
root@mail2:/userM/mail-services/dovecot/sbin# ./dovecot -n
# 2.2.13: /userM/mail-services/dovecot
I fixed this issue about the process limit in the 10-master.conf file:
default_process_limit = 5000
default_client_limit = 3
On 7/10/14, 10:03 AM, CJ Keist wrote:
It looks like on the system that once we hit around 200 imap processes
it stops there and no more imap processes can be
I'm now dealing with issue with some users on mbox getting invalid user
settings in /var/adm/messages. /var/log/syslog has:
Jul 10 11:21:42 mail2 dovecot: [ID 583609 mail.error] lda(ejames):
Error: user ejames: Initialization failed: Namespace '': Mail storage
autodetection failed with home=/
It's not fixed. Now the limit looks to be around 500 processes and we
start to get number of connections exceeded. Any ideas?
On 7/10/14, 10:35 AM, CJ Keist wrote:
I fixed this issue about the process limit in the 10-master.conf file:
default_process_limit = 5000
default_client_
"process_limit = " parameter in it.
On one of oour servers there we have "process_limit = 2048" and we habe
about 1200 concurrent connections without problems.
Best,
Urban
Am 10.07.2014 20:33, schrieb CJ Keist:
It's not fixed. Now the limit looks to be around 500 processes a
rvices/dovecot2/var/run/dovecot//auth-master
mode: 384
On 7/10/14, 1:11 PM, CJ Keist wrote:
That didn't work. Still seem to stop accepting new imap connections when
we hit around 500 processes.
On 7/10/14, 12:48 PM, Urban Loesch wrote:
Hi,
not shure if that helps.
In 10-master.conf fi
.
Not sure why the dovecot -n showed double slash, it's not that way in
the config file.
On 7/10/14, 2:38 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 10. jul. 2014 21.59.28 CEST, CJ Keist wrote:
root@mail2:/userM/mail-services/dovecot2/sbin# ./dovecot -n
# 1.2.17: /userM/mail-services/dovecot
Thank you. I will try these settings out and give 2.2 one more shot.
On 7/11/2014 2:04 AM, Nick Edwards wrote:
On 7/11/14, CJ Keist wrote:
see inlines, its what we needed, we found dovecots default is great -
for SOHO, but hopeless for ISP size use which is what you need, I
wish Timo
cot logs, which should happen just before
you reach the limit.
On 10.7.2014, at 21.33, CJ Keist wrote:
It's not fixed. Now the limit looks to be around 500 processes and we start to
get number of connections exceeded. Any ideas?
On 7/10/14, 10:35 AM, CJ Keist wrote:
I fixed this i
the case to support mix mbox and Maildir by commenting
out the mail_location lines?
CJ Keist.Email: cj.ke...@colostate.edu
Systems Group Manager. Solaris 10 OS (SAI)
Engineering Network Services. Phone: 970-491-0630
College of Engineering
65 matches
Mail list logo
