[Dovecot] overnight clients causing lockfiles to be converted to root-owned messages on debian lenny

2009-04-22 Thread Brett Dikeman
Greetings all, After running for more than a year without issue on debian lenny while it was in the testing- we're now experiencing problems under Lenny/Stable. Dovecot now converts some sort of lockfile into messages, and they're owned by root. The result is a mess; clients can't read their mai

Re: [Dovecot] overnight clients causing lockfiles to be converted to root-owned messages on debian lenny

2009-04-22 Thread Brett Dikeman
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:23 -0400, Brett Dikeman wrote: >> Apr 22 00:08:34 host dovecot: IMAP(user): Fixed a duplicate: >> 1240289413.9181_0.host:2,S.lock -> 1240373314.P6717Q0M159857.host > > Something's

Re: [Dovecot] overnight clients causing lockfiles to be converted to root-owned messages on debian lenny

2009-04-22 Thread Brett Dikeman
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 4/22/2009, Brett Dikeman (brett.dike...@gmail.com) wrote: >> The lock files are one possible problem, but it is a HUGE problem that >> Dovecot is converting them into root-owned zero-length emails! > > Do you

Re: [Dovecot] overnight clients causing lockfiles to be converted to root-owned messages on debian lenny

2009-04-22 Thread Brett Dikeman
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > How is /var/spool/mail mounted (local disk or network)?  What filesystem is > it using? Please read my original message. We're in the process of eliminating our backup software (Networker.) The directives were changed around the same ti

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot and SSD

2010-07-29 Thread Brett Dikeman
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Curtis Maloney wrote: > Umm... apart from "shiney toys", is there any legitemate reason for such > expense on performance tuning? SSDs are a perfectly legitimate technology for a mail server which deals with a lot of random IO. Hell, they're a perfectly legitima

[Dovecot] restrictions on folder length?

2009-11-25 Thread Brett Dikeman
Greetings all, After migrating a few dozen people to our departmental mailserver, we've run into a problem with one user who makes extensive use of folders and nesting them. I've seen as many as 8 levels. The longest resulting folder name is 113 characters, which results in a total path length o

Re: [Dovecot] restrictions on folder length?

2009-11-25 Thread Brett Dikeman
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > mbox or maildir? What OS? What filesystem? Ah! Sorry- maildir, Debian Stable (Lenny) 64bit, XFS. >> Their old mail server handled this fine, but dovecot is choking on it; >> imapsync reports "invalid mailbox name", and he gets the same