Dovecot-EE repository for Debian 8 (Jessie/stable)

2015-07-17 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, are there plans to support Debian 8 (alias stable, alias jessie) in the dovecot-ee repository? Currently there are only squeeze and wheezy repos. The wheezy repo is uninstallable due to an unsatisfyable dependency on libicu48. Of course you can install libicu48 from Wheezy on a Jessie system

Re: quota_full_tempfail = yes broken with lmtp_rcpt_check_quota (was: Re: lmtp_rcpt_check_quota not working)

2015-07-17 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Bernhard Schmidt wrote: *bump* this is still an issue with Dovecot 2.2.18.2 from the dovecot-ee repository > With 2.2.15 from dovecot-ee it is different. The quota is now checked at > RCPT stage > > # 2.2.15.8 (912dd04d7a14+): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > # Pigeonhole version 0.4.

[Dovecot] Parallel auth

2011-07-21 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hello, we run a Dovecot 2.0.13 instance purely as SASL backend for Postfix, authenticating against a local passwd-file and our central LDAP database. # dovecot -n # 2.0.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32.36-0.5-default x86_64 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 # (x86_64) auth_mechanism

[Dovecot] dovecot 1.1rc1 deliver linker error without mbox

2008-03-02 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, compiling dovecot-1.1rc1 with the option --with-storages=maildir,raw raises the following error: cc -std=gnu99 -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -o deliver auth-client.o delive

[Dovecot] IPv6-enabled dovecot-1.1rc* does not accept IPv4-connections

2008-03-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, I'm having a really really strange problem. After upgrading from 1.1.beta13 to 1.1.rc2 (happened with rc1 as well IIRC) I can't connect to the services using IPv4 anymore. dovecot happily binds to the IPv6 wildcard socket which should accept IPv4 connections as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nets

Re: [Dovecot] IPv6-enabled dovecot-1.1rc* does not accept IPv4-connections

2008-03-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm having a really really strange problem. After upgrading from >> 1.1.beta13 to 1.1.rc2 (happened with rc1 as well IIRC) I can't connect >> to the services using IPv4 anymore. dovecot happily binds to the IPv6 >> wildcard socket which should accept IPv

Re: [Dovecot] IPv6-enabled dovecot-1.1rc* does not accept IPv4-connections

2008-03-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Timo Sirainen wrote: Mar 8 13:02:57 vs02 deliver((null)): User request from dovecot-auth timed out Oh, that's a new bug. This should fix it: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/631fd6f25e41 Works, thanks a lot. Regards, Bernhard

[Dovecot] Weird Dovecot 1.1.6 + pop3s certificate issues

2009-02-13 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hello everyone, I've been asked by a colleague to have a look at some extremely weird dovecot SSL issue they are seeing on one of the student mailservers. They are running dovecot 1.1.6 (yes, I know, a bit old ...) on SLES 10.2 x86_64 with imap(+starttls), imaps, pop3(+starttls) and pop3s enabled

[Dovecot] Segfault in Sieve 1.2

2009-04-05 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hello, two days ago I've upgraded to 1.2rc2 and the new sieve implementation (version 0.1.4). Today I got the first mail that got stuck in the postfix queue because deliver was dying with a segfault. The mail is spam, thus I don't have any issues sharing it: http://users.birkenwald.de/~berni/temp

[Dovecot] Multiple use of the same LDAP attribute

2009-04-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, we've found a weird bug (?) in Dovecot 1.1.11. Since day and age we've been running dovecot for our student mailserver, getting the location of the mailbox from a LDAP directory. We allow login and LDA with both full mail address and an internal username, so the mailbox directory is based on

Re: [Dovecot] Multiple use of the same LDAP attribute

2009-04-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Charles Marcus wrote: >> we've found a weird bug (?) in Dovecot 1.1.11. > dovecot -n output is usually desired when asking for help, especially > when it is a likely config issue... I don't think it's a config issue, but here we go: lxmhs23: # dovecot -n # 1.1.11: /mnt/mail2/

Re: [Dovecot] Multiple use of the same LDAP attribute

2009-04-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:41:17PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > So, it looks like there is an issue using the same LDAP attribute > > (xxxMailbox in this case) twice in variable expansion. > > Is this a known issue? > Yes. I was planning on rewriting LDAP configuration and getting it fixed > a

Re: [Dovecot] Multiple use of the same LDAP attribute

2009-04-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Daniel L. Miller wrote: > I'll admit I don't understand what you're trying to do with the above > parameters, but let me share what I'm using and see if it helps. I > happen to be using a pure virtual configuration, with my mail users > logging in using their full email address as a username.

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0.7 (0757f4f5b882): LMTP Server refuses queued mail

2010-11-28 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Thomas Leuxner wrote: > Narrowing down the issue a bit. With the code that was present on Nov > 22, those Newsletter mails worked (needless to say config wasn't > changed): Same here, but I can limit the window some more. 8adacd9c03b2 from Nov 18th was fine and it was busted with 0bc3751c6657 on

Re: [Dovecot] listen = ipv4, ipv6

2011-05-03 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Leo Baltus wrote: Hello Leo, > We want dovecot to listen on a specific ip4 & ipv6 addresses like so: > > listen = 145.58.1.1, [2a02:458:1::1] > > But on startup it tells me: > > Fatal: service(managesieve-login) Can't resolve address [2a02:458:1::1]: Name > or service not known Try without the

[Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0+LMTP: Legal MAIL FROM rejected?

2011-06-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, I run Dovecot 2.0.13 fed by Postfix over LMTP. Today it rejected one mail Postfix and Amavis accepted, generating a bounce. It was just a spammail, but I think the sender address is legal according to RFC5321 and should be accepted. I don't like generating bounces, email should be either rejec

[Dovecot] LDAP timeout

2011-06-27 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, we recently hit an issue where one (of the three configured) LDAP servers dropped an index on an attribute due to a misconfiguration, which caused all/most queries for passdb to take a very long time (several 10s of seconds). The other servers would have been fine, but it seems like Dovecot

Re: [Dovecot] LDAP timeout

2011-06-29 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, Fallbacking to another LDAP server is done by OpenLDAP internally. So what would be needed is either a) OpenLDAP to itself figure out that queries are running too slowly and see if another server is faster, or b) Dovecot figure that out itself and force OpenLDAP to switch to another server.

[Dovecot] auth timeout state=2, bad?

2012-10-22 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hello, we run Dovecot 2.1.7 as SASL backend for our Postfix SMTP-AUTH farm and see this error message occasionally Oct 22 16:15:32 lxmhs52 dovecot: auth: PLAIN(?,xx.xx.xx.xx): Request 0.21 timeouted after 150 secs, state=2 Since it is mostly the same IP repeating I'm assuming it's a client issue

[Dovecot] LDAP congestion

2012-11-06 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hello, I've been asked to have a look at a misbehaving mail server of some colleagues today where almost all logins where failing or excessively delayed, while the LDAP database itself was pretty fast. They run Dovecot 1.2.11 (yes, I know, stoneage) against an LDAP server run by a 3rd party, auth

[Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0b3 IDLE not advertised

2010-02-26 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, I'm not sure whether the client or the server is at fault (probably the client), but it's clearly a regression for me. I'm using the LCG Profimail (http://lonelycatgames.com/?app=profimail) application for my Symbian smartphone which has quite decent IMAP capabilities. Amongst others it can

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0b3 IDLE not advertised

2010-02-27 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, Do you think there's any chance of getting Profimail fixed by reporting this as a bug for them? Other new servers besides Dovecot behave in a similar way. I'll try. They are pretty active in development, but god knows how they handle support queries. I've raised the issue with their suppor

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0.beta3: Child killed with signal 11

2010-02-28 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 16:09 +0100, Thomas Leuxner wrote: >> Feb 28 16:07:00 spectre dovecot: master: service(lmtp): child 17322 kille= > d with signal 11 (core dumps disabled) > Could you get gdb backtrace? http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html For the record, I see those too.

[Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0.beta3 managesieve sig11 (was: Re: Dovecot 2.0.beta3: Child killed with signal 11)

2010-02-28 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > And managesieve segfaults immediately at TCP connect, but I have not > managed to get a backtrace yet (it always says "core not dumped" > regardless of ulimit -c setting. I also added -D to the executable, but > no core file yet) > > Feb 28 1

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0.beta3 managesieve sig11

2010-02-28 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On 28.02.2010 20:24, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 18:34 +, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: And managesieve segfaults immediately at TCP connect, but I have not managed to get a backtrace yet (it always says "core not dumped" regardless of ulimit -c setting. I also added

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0.beta3: Child killed with signal 11

2010-02-28 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >> On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 16:09 +0100, Thomas Leuxner wrote: >>> Feb 28 16:07:00 spectre dovecot: master: service(lmtp): child 17322 kille= >> d with signal 11 (core dumps disabled) >> Could you get gdb backtrace? http://dovecot.org/bugreport.htm

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0b3 IDLE not advertised

2010-03-01 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Ed W wrote: > Suggest drop them a line in the first instance? (You could check that > the COMPRESS stuff made it into the released build also since Timo > kindly added support for that to 2.0) Lonelycat Games has sent me a fixed build and promised to have it incorporated into the next version.

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0beta3: Latest HG crashed upon LMTP Delivery

2010-03-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Thomas Leuxner wrote: > Simple LMTP handshake crashes it: Same here. I'm pretty sure it has been introduced with one of these two changes: dovecot (2:2.0.beta3-0~auto+24) unstable; urgency=low * New revision (10855:681e1c702899) in dovecot Mercurial repository: - zlib: Several fixes to z

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0beta3: Latest HG crashed upon LMTP Delivery

2010-03-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >> Simple LMTP handshake crashes it: > Same here. I'm pretty sure it has been introduced with one of these two > changes: Affects dovecot-lda as well: mail.svr02.mucip.net:/var/run/dovecot# sudo -u vmail gdb /usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda GNU gdb (

[Dovecot] 2.0beta3 10876:370ee9717a6c broke listen on literal IPv6 address

2010-03-09 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, apparently the following change in dovecot hg * New revision (10876:370ee9717a6c) in dovecot Mercurial repository: - config: Forgot to add header file. broke listen = 83.170.6.69, 2001:1b10:1000::110:1:1 mail.svr02.mucip.net:~# dovecot -F -c /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf doveconf: Warn

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0beta3: Latest HG crashed upon LMTP Delivery

2010-03-09 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Thomas Leuxner wrote: >> Yeah, it's this one. I'll probably revert it soon. I did it mostly while >> trying to fix istream-zlib bugs, but hopefully zlib won't break when >> that change is reverted :) Started my stress test again.. > Just tested and does not appear to be fixed by changeset 10875 >

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0beta3 10876:370ee9717a6c broke listen on literal IPv6 address

2010-03-10 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On 09.03.2010 18:42, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 9.3.2010, at 14.47, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: * New revision (10876:370ee9717a6c) in dovecot Mercurial repository: - config: Forgot to add header file. mail.svr02.mucip.net:~# dovecot -F -c /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf doveconf: Warning: Obsolete

[Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0beta3 LMTP hanging when delivering into a non-existing mailbox

2010-03-12 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, another LMTP problem. When a sieve userscript tries to fileinto a nonexisting mailbox the LMTP process hangs. Mar 12 12:55:28 mail dovecot: lmtp(1328, be...@vmail.mail.mucip.net): kPpuOKArmkswBQAA/GZUZg: sieve: msgid=<201003111751.o2bhptbx069...@squid-cache.org>: failed to store into mailbox

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0beta3 10876:370ee9717a6c broke listen on literal IPv6 address

2010-03-14 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Timo Sirainen wrote: >> mail.svr02.mucip.net:~# dovecot -F -c /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf >> doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:29: >> listen=..:port has been replaced by service { inet_listener { port } } >> doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/d

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0beta3 LMTP hanging when delivering into a non-existing mailbox

2010-03-16 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Timo Sirainen wrote: Hi Timo, >> another LMTP problem. When a sieve userscript tries to fileinto a >> nonexisting mailbox the LMTP process hangs. >> I'm on 10869:bf978f2de0fd. > It was fixed by the next changeset: > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/6d260794f278 Ah right, did not use that b

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0beta3 10876:370ee9717a6c broke listen on literal IPv6 address

2010-03-19 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 18:01 +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >> mail.svr02.mucip.net:~# dovecot -F -c /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf >> doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:29:=20 >> listen=3D..:port has been replaced by service {

[Dovecot] 2.0 beta: LMTP + Sieve fileinto broken

2010-03-20 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hoi, somewhere between Hg revisions 10945 and 10962 filing into a subfolder using sieve Scripts (like fileinto "fwd.sixxs" here) broke Mar 20 18:14:24 mail dovecot: lmtp(27326, be...@vmail.mail.mucip.net): ojJwL3ACpUu+agAA/GZUZg: msgid=: save failed to fwd.sixxs: Mailbox doesn't exist: fwd.sixxs

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0 beta: LMTP + Sieve fileinto broken

2010-03-20 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > somewhere between Hg revisions 10945 and 10962 filing into a subfolder > using sieve Scripts (like fileinto "fwd.sixxs" here) broke Disregard, stupid me broke his lmtp.conf on upgrade. Bernhard

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0 beta: LMTP + Sieve fileinto broken

2010-03-20 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Thomas Leuxner wrote: >> somewhere between Hg revisions 10945 and 10962 filing into a subfolder >> using sieve Scripts (like fileinto "fwd.sixxs" here) broke > Hmmm. Works for me with 10962 but there's quite a bunch of changes = > inbetween... I'm a bit confused as well. I accidentally dropped

[Dovecot] 2.0.beta3 imapd running hot

2010-03-20 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, since a couple of weeks I occasionally have an imapd going crazy on me, using up 100% CPU. Current revision is 10962 29865 vmail 20 0 47820 3296 1708 R 99.7 0.9 131:07.85 imap vmail29865 86.1 0.8 47820 3296 ?RMar20 131:20 dovecot/imap [berni 2001:a60:f001:1:219:66ff

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0.beta3 imapd running hot

2010-03-22 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On 21.03.2010 15:17, Timo Sirainen wrote: Hi, strace -p shows a repeating pattern of epoll_wait(8, {{EPOLLOUT, {u32=36560672, u64=36560672}}}, 5, 4872) = 1 gettimeofday({1269133967, 495298}, NULL) = 0 gettimeofday({1269133967, 495333}, NULL) = 0 gettimeofday({1269133967, 495370}, NULL) = 0

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0.beta3 imapd running hot

2010-03-28 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On 21.03.2010 15:17, Timo Sirainen wrote: Hi Timo, It would be helpful to find out what the I/O function is that is being called. For example: b ioloop-epoll.c:208 p *io cont p *io cont ..etc.. What is the *io output? If it's client_output() or something else as generic.. Use "step" to get in

[Dovecot] zlib delivery in 2.0beta6

2010-06-13 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, I just wanted to test the zlib plugin in Dovecot 2.0 and have a problem. Delivery via LMTP works fine and the mail is saved compressed. -rw--- 1 vmail vmail 1012 13. Jun 12:51 1276426292.M93539P15363.mail.svr02.mucip.net,S=2799,W=2850:2, # file 1276426292.M93539P15363.mail.svr02.mucip.net

[Dovecot] AUTH PLAIN error with Thunderbird and Dovecot 1.2

2009-07-05 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, a few days ago I started to get some complaints about authentication delays from Thunderbird POP3 users. After some debugging it turned out that the problem was introduced somewhere between 1.2rc3 and 1.2rc7 (1.2.0 is still affected). A session with Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 against 1.2rc3 looks l

Re: [Dovecot] AUTH PLAIN error with Thunderbird and Dovecot 1.2

2009-07-05 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > a few days ago I started to get some complaints about authentication > delays from Thunderbird POP3 users. After some debugging it turned out > that the problem was introduced somewhere between 1.2rc3 and 1.2rc7 > (1.2.0 is still affected). Reverting

Re: [Dovecot] init-script update for v2.0

2009-11-25 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Pascal Volk wrote: > * Added LSB-compliant info block (for insserv and friends) [...] > +# Required-Start:$local_fs $syslog > +# Required-Stop: $local_fs $syslog > +# Should-Start: $time I think this should be $remote_fs, as according to http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB

[Dovecot] LMTP crash with sdbox and SIS

2013-06-12 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Debian Wheezy amd64 plus Stefan's stable-auto/dovecot2.2 repository 2:2.2.2-0~auto+57 = 16495:d447dcc6b611 Crash goes away when I disable mail_attachment_dir, happens with a fresh home as well # 2.2.2 (d447dcc6b611): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian 7.0 disable_p

Re: [Dovecot] LMTP crash with sdbox and SIS

2013-06-12 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > Debian Wheezy amd64 plus Stefan's stable-auto/dovecot2.2 repository > 2:2.2.2-0~auto+57 = 16495:d447dcc6b611 > > Crash goes away when I disable mail_attachment_dir, happens with a > fresh home as well Log: Jun 12 21:46:23 lxmhs69 doveco

Re: [Dovecot] LMTP crash with sdbox and SIS

2013-06-13 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Am 13.06.2013 03:56, schrieb Timo Sirainen: On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 19:51 +, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: Debian Wheezy amd64 plus Stefan's stable-auto/dovecot2.2 repository 2:2.2.2-0~auto+57 = 16495:d447dcc6b611 Crash goes away when I disable mail_attachment_dir, happens with a fresh ho

[Dovecot] lmtp_rcpt_check_quota not working

2014-02-10 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, Dovecot 2.2.9 (Debian package from backports) does not seem to respect lmtp_rcpt_check_quota # 2.2.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian 7.4 deliver_log_format = from=<%e>, size=%p, message-id=<%m>, status=%$ disable_plaintext_auth = no lmtp_rcpt_check_quota =

Re: [Dovecot] lmtp_rcpt_check_quota not working

2014-02-13 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Axel Luttgens wrote: Hi Axel, > Le 11 févr. 2014 à 08:34, Bernhard Schmidt a écrit : > >> [...] >> so Dovecot should reject in RCPT TO phase, but according to the logs of the >> upstream Postfix it does so after END-OF-DATA >> >> (host xxx[2001:xxx] said: 4

Re: [Dovecot] lmtp_rcpt_check_quota not working

2014-05-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Bernhard Schmidt wrote: Hi Timo, in case you missed that... > Hi, > > Dovecot 2.2.9 (Debian package from backports) does not seem to respect > lmtp_rcpt_check_quota > > # 2.2.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > # OS: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian 7.4 > deliver_log_for

OOM in Dovecot 2.2.13 imap

2014-06-23 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, we run Dovecot 2.2.13 on Debian Wheezy with a couple thousand mailboxes. We have two users that repeatedly trigger an OOM condition with IMAP. Jun 23 12:53:21 lxmhs74 dovecot: imap(USER): Fatal: pool_system_realloc(268435456): Out of memory Jun 23 12:53:21 lxmhs74 dovecot: imap(USER): Error:

Re: OOM in Dovecot 2.2.13 imap

2014-06-23 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On 23.06.2014 16:38, Steffen Kaiser wrote: On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: we run Dovecot 2.2.13 on Debian Wheezy with a couple thousand mailboxes. We have two users that repeatedly trigger an OOM condition with IMAP. Do those users have mailboxes extra ordinary large or is one

Re: OOM in Dovecot 2.2.13 imap

2014-07-03 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi Timo, thanks for your answer. we run Dovecot 2.2.13 on Debian Wheezy with a couple thousand mailboxes. We have two users that repeatedly trigger an OOM condition with IMAP. Jun 23 12:53:21 lxmhs74 dovecot: imap(USER): Fatal: pool_system_realloc(268435456): Out of memory .. #6 0x7f117

quota_full_tempfail = yes broken with lmtp_rcpt_check_quota (was: Re: lmtp_rcpt_check_quota not working)

2015-01-29 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Bernhard Schmidt wrote: Hi, > Axel Luttgens wrote: > > Hi Axel, > >> Le 11 févr. 2014 à 08:34, Bernhard Schmidt a écrit : >> >>> [...] >>> so Dovecot should reject in RCPT TO phase, but according to the logs of the >>> upstream Postfix it do

[Dovecot] dovecot-sieve-1.0 (hg) does not build

2007-05-29 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, the dovecot-sieve plugin from the hg repository (http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-sieve-1.0/) does not build against current dovecot-1.0 repository. /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-su

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-sieve-1.0 (hg) does not build

2007-06-04 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Timo Sirainen schrieb: Hi, the dovecot-sieve plugin from the hg repository (http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-sieve-1.0/) does not build against current dovecot-1.0 repository. .. /.libs/libsieve.a(script.o): In function `sieve_script_parse': /usr/src/dovecot-sieve-1.0/src/libsieve/script.c:140:

Re: [Dovecot] v1.0.2 release candidate

2007-07-12 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unless someone finds something broken, I'll release v1.0.2 in a few > days. The most important changes since v1.0.1: I'm getting a _large_ number of UIDVALIDITY changes logging messages, even when I have completely removed all old index files Jul 13 00:

Re: [Dovecot] v1.0.2 release candidate

2007-07-12 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Timo Sirainen wrote: Hi Timo, Unless someone finds something broken, I'll release v1.0.2 in a few days. The most important changes since v1.0.1: I'm getting a _large_ number of UIDVALIDITY changes logging messages, even when I have completely removed all old index files rc2 should have fixed

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot 1.1beta2 and dovecot-sieve 1.1.2 - crash in LDA

2007-10-12 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Bernhard Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've upgraded to dovecot 1.1beta2 and the latest dovecot-sieve release > yesterday and have one single mail that cannot be delivered repeatedly. Screw that, fixed already in the latest hg version, probably with changeset 58d9

[Dovecot] dovecot 1.1beta2 and dovecot-sieve 1.1.2 - crash in LDA

2007-10-12 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
f66d96] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver(main+0xe74) [0x417d24] -> /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4) [0x2b662da15b44] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver [0x416079] All other mails work fine, so there is probably something corner case here. Timo, I'll send you the mail in private. Regards, Bernhard Schmidt

[Dovecot] Incomplete Subject Line

2007-10-16 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, since upgrading from 1.0.5 to latest 1.1-hg I get an incomplete subject line for mails autogenerated by one of our systems in the message list (Thunderbird and mutt). When I open the mail the subject line is intact. It appears that the system is using multiline subjects. Example Subject: =?I

Re: [Dovecot] Incomplete Subject Line

2007-10-20 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, > > since upgrading from 1.0.5 to latest 1.1-hg I get an incomplete subject > > line for mails autogenerated by one of our systems in the message list > > (Thunderbird and mutt). When I open the mail the subject line is intact. > > > > It appears that the system is using multiline subjects. Ex

Re: [Dovecot] Incomplete Subject Line

2007-10-20 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, > > Reply-To: Doku-Ticket System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?B?SG9zdG1hc3RlcjogMDAwMDAxMDE5OiBOYW1lc2U=?= > > =?ISO-8859-1?B?cnZlcjogTmV1dmVyZ2FiZSBvZGVyIMRuZGVydW5n?= > > .. > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > Subject: =?ISO-88

Dovecot LMTP mixing up users on multi-recipient mail

2019-06-27 Thread Bernhard Schmidt via dovecot
Hi, I've upgraded a mailstore from Debian Jessie (aka oldstable) with Dovecot 2.2.13 to Debian Buster (next stable) with Dovecot 2.3.4.1 today. It worked pretty well, except that we're seeing error messages very similar to this old thread https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2015-July/101396.htm