Hi,
I'm having some trouble with matching. The regexp in my dovecot.sieve
file should match on email addresses, but does not.
# The code:
if header :matches "From" "<[a-z0-9-]*@[a-z0-9-.]*>" { set "sender" "${1}"; }
if not execute "grepfrom" ["${sender}"] {
if envelope :matches "from" "*" {
Hi,
As I migrate to sieve, I would like to carry over the logic I had in
procmail rules, which let me take all mail where I'd never sent email
to that address into a final spam catchall, which I called
"neversent."
I see that sieve can't run external programs, and I wonder if that
means I'm SOL,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:41:01AM +0100, Stephan Bosch wrote:
| Op 2/8/2017 om 1:27 AM schreef Adam Shostack:
| > Hi,
| >
| > As I migrate to sieve, I would like to carry over the logic I had in
| > procmail rules, which let me take all mail where I'd never sent email
| > to
Thanks for the previous answer on :execute. In thinking about
malicious input, I am worried about the possibility that mail will be
sent with a clever from line. (Section 7 of
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5229.txt is great, btw)
To address this, I'm considering the following, and would appreciate
Hi,
Is there a clean way to match on an email address the way procmail
^TO_ did? that was a macro which expanded to
(^((Original-)?(Resent-)?(To|Cc|Bcc)|(X-Envelope
|Apparently(-Resent)?)-To):(.*[^-a-zA-Z0-9_.])?)
so you could write
* ^TO_dovecot
dovecot
and grab messages to the list. In siev
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 11:27:22AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
| On 5/9/17, 11:25 AM, "dovecot on behalf of Christian Kivalo"
wrote:
| Am 9. Mai 2017 17:47:13 MESZ schrieb Adam Shostack :
| >Hi,
| >
| >Is there a clean way to match on an email addre
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 12:41:10PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
| | >^TO_ did? that was a macro which expanded to
| | >(^((Original-)?(Resent-)?(To|Cc|Bcc)|(X-Envelope
| | >|Apparently(-Resent)?)-To):(.*[^-a-zA-Z0-9_.])?)
| | >
| | >so you could write
|
e
directory name.
Can someone point out where I'm failing?
Adam
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:50:23AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
| On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 11:27:22AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
| >On 5/9/17, 11:25 AM, "dovecot on behalf of Christian Kivalo"
wrot
So I'm confused as to why you're piping back from procmail to dovecot
LDA, rather than having procmail be the final LDA.
Why not use:
:0 w
* ^List-ID:.*jenkinsci-dev.googlegroups.com
mailing-lists/jenkinsci-dev/
(The trailing slash tells procmail that jenkinssci-dev is a maildir,
not an mbox)
A
ot;dovecot on behalf of Christian Kivalo"
wrote:
| | >
| | >
| | >
| | > Am 9. Mai 2017 17:47:13 MESZ schrieb Adam Shostack :
| | > >Hi,
| | > >
| | > >Is there a clean way to match on an email address the way procmail
| | > >^TO_ did?
10 matches
Mail list logo
