Today I realized that it was indeed the sa-learn that is slowing down my
Archiving.
I added an «&» on the end of the line that calls the sa-learn (called by the
report-ham.sieve script):
exec /usr/bin/sa-learn -u ${1} --ham &
Does anyone thing this is a bad idea? I noticed that archiving got
Thanks a lot Marc.
I actually found something that works for me:
I replaced `sa-learn -u xx --ham`
with
`spamc -u xx -L ham`
Archiving wasn't as fast as simply moving messages, but was considerably
faster - fast enough that no errors on Roundcube are reported.
Best,
Francis
---
Francis Augu
I have a mailing server setup based on Debian Stable that uses postfix
(v3.7.10) for SMTP and dovecot (v2.3.19.1 (9b53102964)) for IMAP. I now wanted
to set dovecot to not write to syslog, but to dedicated files in
/var/log/dovecot. While everything indicates that this happens successfully as
On 19/05/24 04:31, Richard Rosner via dovecot wrote:
I have a mailing server setup based on Debian Stable that uses postfix
(v3.7.10) for SMTP and dovecot (v2.3.19.1 (9b53102964)) for IMAP. I now
wanted to set dovecot to not write to syslog, but to dedicated files in
/var/log/dovecot. While eve
> Today I realized that it was indeed the sa-learn that is slowing down my
> Archiving.
>
> I added an «&» on the end of the line that calls the sa-learn (called by
> the report-ham.sieve script):
>
> exec /usr/bin/sa-learn -u ${1} --ham &
>
> Does anyone thing this is a bad idea? I noticed tha
