Quoting Benny Pedersen :
Christian Kivalo skrev den 2024-01-21 02:08:
Just wish LMTP would not end up with duplicate Return-Path headers..
Duplicate return path headers? I don't see them on my system. All
mail is sent from postfix to dovecot with lmtp
it simply works better with lda ? :)
> On 20/01/2024 17:00 EET Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
>
>
> I'd like to add that allowing to save messages via virtual folder to some
> folder
> by change it defintion to
>
> *
> !Archive
> -Trash
> -Trash/*
> -Junk
> -Junk/*
> all
>
> doesn't help and syncronization fails as u
Can you try with doveadm -D and send the log?
Aki
> On 20/01/2024 19:51 EET Andy Balholm wrote:
>
>
> I forgot to mention in my original message that I'm running Dovecot
> 2.3.21 (47349e2482).
>
> It seems like the stalls are more likely to happen
> when the type of sync is "incremental" rat
Another thing i noticed that you are using
login_access_sockets = tcpwrap
I wonder if tcpwrap might be interfering here?
Also, since you are using FreeBSD, can you use sockstat -l to determine if 4190
is listed there anymore?
Did you check that you haven't firewalled the port off?
Aki
> On
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 16:34:44 +0100,
Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> Can you send output of doveconf -n?
>
Sure, here it is:
# 2.3.20 (80a5ac675d): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.5.20 (149edcf2)
# OS: OpenBSD 7.4 amd64
# Hostname: mx1.catap.net
default_vsz_limit = 10 G
dovead
I don't see "login_access_sockets = tcpwrap" via dovecot -n
and am on openSuse Leap 15.5, not FreeBSD.
However output of socklist -l is attached.
Interestingly, I see tcp6 and udp6 listed. Not sure what that means in
this context as IPv6 is not enabled, supposedly, on this unit.
joe a.
On 1
On 2024-01-21 04:43, Patrick Domack via dovecot wrote:
Quoting Benny Pedersen :
Christian Kivalo skrev den 2024-01-21 02:08:
Just wish LMTP would not end up with duplicate Return-Path headers..
Duplicate return path headers? I don't see them on my system. All
mail is sent from postfix to do
joe a skrev den 2024-01-21 17:55:
I don't see "login_access_sockets = tcpwrap" via dovecot -n
and am on openSuse Leap 15.5, not FreeBSD.
However output of socklist -l is attached.
Interestingly, I see tcp6 and udp6 listed. Not sure what that means in
this context as IPv6 is not enabled, suppo
On 1/21/2024 13:00:25, Benny Pedersen wrote:
joe a skrev den 2024-01-21 17:55:
I don't see "login_access_sockets = tcpwrap" via dovecot -n
and am on openSuse Leap 15.5, not FreeBSD.
However output of socklist -l is attached.
Interestingly, I see tcp6 and udp6 listed. Not sure what that means
joe a skrev den 2024-01-21 19:42:
Do not know what you mean by "containers".
service managesieve-login {
inet_listener sieve {
address = 127.0.0.1
port = 4190
}
process_min_avail = 0
service_count = 1
vsz_limit = 64 M
}
service managesieve {
process_limit = 1024
}
what did
On 1/21/2024 14:13:14, Benny Pedersen wrote:
joe a skrev den 2024-01-21 19:42:
Do not know what you mean by "containers".
service managesieve-login {
inet_listener sieve {
address = 127.0.0.1
port = 4190
}
process_min_avail = 0
service_count = 1
vsz_limit = 64 M
}
ser
joe a skrev den 2024-01-21 20:47:
Ah, I see what you meant now.
good to see progress
I added the local host and the bound NIC IP, restarted dovecot, but,
still no love from 4190
check your doveconf -n, if missing what i posted, unsure ?
pm me your doveconf -n, i have lost if you already d
On 1/21/2024 15:05:13, Benny Pedersen wrote:
joe a skrev den 2024-01-21 20:47:
Ah, I see what you meant now.
good to see progress
I added the local host and the bound NIC IP, restarted dovecot, but,
still no love from 4190
check your doveconf -n, if missing what i posted, unsure ?
pm me
Joe A: If you are on FreeBSD, is there a reason you're not using the Ports
version (either via pkg or compiled from ports?
I'm the FreeBSD port maintainer and am more than happy to help privately if
necessary.
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 3:21 PM joe a wrote:
On 1/21/2024 15:05:13, Benny Pedersen
If postfix is adding it, your not using lmtp.
Only virtual and local adds it in postfix, lmtp is a symlink to smtp
and does not add that header.
If your somehow delivering the mail through local, then forwarding it
again via lmtp, that would be a bad thing.
Maybe look how you have spam/virus/
>I should add, I compiled dovecot locally, it is not the vendor supplied
>package. Could that matter?
Have you also compiled pigeonhole / managesieve
https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/download.html
This provides the managesieve server functionality
--
Christian Kivalo
__
On 1/21/2024 16:25:02, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Joe A: If you are on FreeBSD, is there a reason you're not using the
Ports version (either via pkg or compiled from ports?
I'm the FreeBSD port maintainer and am more than happy to help privately
if necessary.
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 3:21 PM joe a <
oh, I see. I thought I saw FreeBSD mentioned. Sorry for the confusion.
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 4:10 PM joe a wrote:
On 1/21/2024 16:25:02, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Joe A: If you are on FreeBSD, is there a reason you're not using
the
> Ports version (either via pkg or compiled
On 1/21/2024 16:37:26, Christian Kivalo wrote:
I should add, I compiled dovecot locally, it is not the vendor supplied
package. Could that matter?
Have you also compiled pigeonhole / managesieve
https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/download.html
This provides the managesieve server functionality
joe a skrev den 2024-01-21 22:20:
Now, where are my notes? . . . oh, right, my bad.
check the maillist then :=)
protocols = imap lmtp
add sieve there
more help then i need "netstat -natpu | grep dovecot" output
tux ~ # netstat -natpu | grep dovecot
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:993
I have a mail server using dovecot that has been running without issue for
quite a couple of years now. It serves email for about 30 individuals.
But since Jan 14th, users have been reporting spurious errors in MS Outlook:
316 Jan 21 00:38:12 ip-172-30-0-131 dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected
Steve Dondley via dovecot skrev den 2024-01-22 02:18:
I have a mail server using dovecot that has been running without issue
for quite a couple of years now. It serves email for about 30
individuals.
But since Jan 14th, users have been reporting spurious errors in MS
Outlook:
324 Jan 21
On 1/21/2024 19:00:28, Benny Pedersen wrote:
joe a skrev den 2024-01-21 22:20:
Now, where are my notes? . . . oh, right, my bad.
check the maillist then :=)
protocols = imap lmtp
add sieve there
more help then i need "netstat -natpu | grep dovecot" output
tux ~ # netstat -natpu | grep dov
23 matches
Mail list logo
