Wouldn’t it be ideal to link to a LMTP documentation page that describes how to
do the same thing under LTMP, and not link to LDA?
> On 22 May 2022, at 01:07, Daniel Lange wrote:
>
> Am 21.05.22 um 23:30 schrieb dove...@ptld.com:
>> Dovecot accepts the mail from postfix via LMTP. Dovecot alread
On 2022-05-22 11:33, Lucas Rolff wrote:
Wouldn’t it be ideal to link to a LMTP documentation page that
describes how to do the same thing under LTMP, and not link to LDA?
typo :)
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/protocols/lmtp_server/
https://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotL
Neither of those two describe how to lowercase the extension part – that’s a
bit the point. One puts info that they use LMTP, another decides to link LDA
docs, and even quoting how to lower the extension part, despite that isn’t
actually possible in LMTP in a similar manner.
I’m sure the OP had
On 2022-05-22 12:35, Lucas Rolff wrote:
Neither of those two describe how to lowercase the extension part –
oh
lmtp is single delivering so multirecipient is not supported, details
matter
postfix side of it knows this detail in lmtp
expand extension part in postfix would possible solve it
I find it funny you point out typos, considering you do plenty of them yourself
in the various mailing lists where you’re present 😉
Before you point fingers at others, maybe consider ensuring your emails are
typo-free yourself.
Have a good one Benny.
From: dovecot on behalf of Benny Pedersen
Am 22.05.22 um 11:33 schrieb Lucas Rolff:
Wouldn’t it be ideal to link to a LMTP documentation page that describes how to
do the same thing under LTMP, and not link to LDA?
No, because that's not (easily) possible as others have pointed out
already. FTR: It is possible but on the postfix side
> On 05-22-2022 10:53 am, Daniel Lange wrote:
> No, because that's not (easily) possible as others have pointed out already.
> FTR: It is possible but on the postfix side of things with multiple options.
> https://groups.google.com/g/mailing.postfix.users/c/1p0ubY726N8/m/D3s9V5PXHcIJ
> for the old
