Hi,
Thank you both for the additional suggestions!
MJ
Hi,
Environment: Dovecot 2.3.18 running on CentOS 7, mdbox, LDAP users
I'm in the process of moving my mailboxes to NFS and moving with lock
and index files in temp storage following instructions from
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/nfs.
I set mail_location as:
mail_location
I'm not sure about that configuration.
I have seen huge index cache files for users with lots of mail, putting
those in memory may be a risk.
On 25/03/2022 14:56, doug wrote:
Hi,
Environment: Dovecot 2.3.18 running on CentOS 7, mdbox, LDAP users
I'm in the process of moving my mailboxes to
Thank you João! I too am concerned if this is a risky configuration. My
understanding is that the list indexes are not critical and that is why
the recommendation in an NFS environment is to place just those and the
lock files in memory. Other index files are on permanent storage:
[doug@mailse
In that case things can be more peacefull.
I once had the mail in a NFS storage and was told to move to local
storage because of speed issues.
Really don't know if the .cache and .log should be put in a fast local
storage to speed up things.
On 25/03/2022 16:40, doug wrote:
Thank you João!
Good to know. Many thanks for your comments. Always appreciate when
someone points out risks.
As to my original question, are any others locating LISTINDEX files in
memory successfully with unique UIDs?. Or perhaps it only works out of
the box with a virtual mail user?
On 3/25/2022 12:57 PM
