Technically creating and encrypting folder key does not require decrypting user's private key. All folder keys are encrypted with user's public key.
Aki
On 08/12/2019 09:42 uxqex4efpu--- via dovecot <
dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
Just curious how does moving indexes to different folder help.?
Cheers/DP
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, 01:38 Tomek Lutelmowski via dovecot <
dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
> Gents, thank you all - moving indexes to external folder worked like a
> charm! :-)
>
> czw., 5 gru 2019 o 14:55 Dmitry Donskih via d
Hi all,
I've used most of this weekend finalizing my migration from an old
server running Dovecot 2.2.22 to a brand new installation running 2.3.8.
In general, the migration was painless, everything just clicked, but
checking up on the finer details post migration i've found out that user
sh
On 27/11/2019 08:13, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
On 26.11.2019 19.34, Laurens Post via dovecot wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up my server with support for TLS 1.3 only, but that
does not seem to be supported.
First off, TLS 1.3 itself does work fine, so it's not the config or
ssl library
On 26/11/2019 07:09, Aristedes Maniatis via dovecot wrote:
I've got exim set up to deliver like this:
command = /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -a
$original_local_part@$original_domain -d $local_part@$domain -f $sender_address
If an email to is bob+sa...@ish.com.au then we should
On 06/12/2019 20:54, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
Hi!
It seems there is a bug in the oauth2 driver, it loads the cert files wrong
way. I'll make an internal bug report of this.
Tracking as DOP-1590.
Regards,
Stephan.
On 06/12/2019 16:42 mizuki wrote:
Hi,
For troubleshooting purpos
On 06 Dec 2019, at 16:28, Martynas Bendorius wrote:
> when zlib compression is enabled in dovecot, old emails remain untouched
I’ve been considering doing this, or at least looking into how much space we’d
save (answer so far, less than you might think), but I am hesitant to “alter”
the user’s
On 08 Dec 2019, at 05:58, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 06 Dec 2019, at 16:28, Martynas Bendorius wrote:
>> when zlib compression is enabled in dovecot, old emails remain untouched
>
> I’ve been considering doing this, or at least looking into how much space
> we’d save (answer so far, less than you migh
> Technically creating and encrypting folder key does not
> require decrypting user's private key. All folder keys
> are encrypted with user's public key.
Problem is for that this is a new user. The new user has no private key. I
need for generating that private key. It do not the sense encrypts
s
Hello,
Looking at the SEARCH=INTHREAD extension, Dovecot implements it but the
server doesn't announce the extension in its capabilities (at least
testing with imap://dovecot.org or looking at
https://github.com/dovecot/core/blob/169b1ff42a28cdf2768391d20e8fef13aeae54fb/configure.ac#L783
)
I searched on this, but found information only for very very old dovecot
versions, and those answers didn’t quite cover what I am asking.
All my current mail has the ",S=51489,W=52449:” style tag in the Maildir
filename, but I have many messages in Archive mailboxes that have no size
informatio
It's a known issue that the password will be set to silly value, most likely 'yes'.
You should generate the user key during provisioning with `doveadm cryptokey generate -Uu user -n password`.
Aki
On 08/12/2019 16:22
uxqex4e...@e
Hi,
I do store mail in mdbox format of 150m in size (dovecot 2.3.9).
Once in a while I do experience mdbox files of smaller size, even after
applying 'doveadm purge' and previous expunges by the users. like:
-rw--- 1 vmail dovecot 104854595 Feb 9 2019
/var/mail/.maildirs/userX/storag
On 8.12.2019 13.13, Peter Reinhold via dovecot wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've used most of this weekend finalizing my migration from an old
> server running Dovecot 2.2.22 to a brand new installation running 2.3.8.
>
> In general, the migration was painless, everything just clicked, but
> checking up
Another query: Can proxy_maybe be used with director setup.
--
Soumitri
On 12/7/19 4:43 AM, soumitri--- via dovecot wrote:
Hi,
I think option-2 below seems better or am I missing something with
director concept.
1. As director and back-end in same server (broken) not recommended, I
need mi
On 8.12.2019 22.10, Michael Grimm via dovecot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I do store mail in mdbox format of 150m in size (dovecot 2.3.9).
>
> Once in a while I do experience mdbox files of smaller size, even after
> applying 'doveadm purge' and previous expunges by the users. like:
>
> -rw--- 1 vmai
16 matches
Mail list logo
