Hello
We are happy users of Dovecot 2.3.4.1 . We run a cronjob that deletes from Trash messages older than 15 days, this is the command we run:
/usr/bin/doveadm expunge -u $USER mailbox Trash savedbefore 15d
But this commands does NOT delete folders inside Trash. doveadm-expunge man pag
Have updated our mail server and are now running Dovecot 2.3.4. Things are
mostly working OK, but occasionally I have users on latest iOS getting this
message: “this message cannot be displayed because of the way it is formatted.
Ask the sender to send it again using a different format or email
Hi
Maby stupid question :)
It possible to have 3 directors (frontend)
but without rings ?
All directors connect to this same dovecot (backend) - all backad have
this same login_trusted_networks
--
Maciej Miłaszewski
IQ PL Sp. z o.o.
Starszy Administrator Systemowy
On 2019-03-06 12:00, James Brown via dovecot wrote:
Have updated our mail server and are now running Dovecot 2.3.4. Things
are mostly working OK, but occasionally I have users on latest iOS
getting this message: “this message cannot be displayed because of the
way it is formatted. Ask the sender
Hi Folks !
I finaly resolve my problem ! 😊
First of all I had to modify namespaces :
###
namespace inbox {
inbox = yes
location =
mailbox Archive {
auto = subscribe
special_use = \Archive
}
mailbox Drafts {
Greetings,
this is less of a bug report or a help request, but we would like to know if
someone can explain the following:
Environment: Centos 7 with Dovecot 2.3.4-2
default_pass_scheme = BLF-CRYPT
password hash in database : BLF-CRYPT
login = works
default_pass_scheme = SHA512 or SHA256-CRYPT
We have dovecot-1:2.3.3-1.fc29.x86_64 running on Fedora 29. I'd like to
test wforce, from https://github.com/PowerDNS/weakforced.
I see instructions at the Authentication policy support page,
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Policy
I see the Required Minimum Configuration:
auth_policy_ser
On 6 March 2019 18:25 Robert Kudyba via dovecot wrote:
We have dovecot-1:2.3.3-1.fc29.x86_64 running on Fedora 29. I'd like to test wforce, from
https://githu
On 6 March 2019 18:16 Kristijan Savic - ratiokontakt GmbH via dovecot <
dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
Greetings,
this is less of a bug report or a help request, but we would like to know if
someo
I took suggestions from https://forge.puppet.com/fraenki/wforce to set
these in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/95-auth.conf
auth_policy_server_url = http://localhost:8084/
auth_policy_hash_nonce = our_password
auth_policy_server_api_header = "Authorization: Basic
hash_from_running_echo-n_base64"
auth_policy_
Hi,
I was womdering, if anyone has experienced the same issues. When I run the
tests after compiling 2.3.5, the following 4 tests fail:
http payload echo (ssl): sequential .. : ok
http payload echo (ssl): pipeline : ok
http payl
wforce is the username always.
auth_policy_hash_nonce should be set to a pseudorandom value that is
shared by your server(s). Weakforced does not need it for anything.
auth_policy_server_api_header should be set to Authorization: Basic
without the < >.
Aki
On 6.3.2019 20.42, Robert Kudyba via
On 6.3.2019 14.26, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote:
> Hi
> Maby stupid question :)
>
> It possible to have 3 directors (frontend)
> but without rings ?
>
> All directors connect to this same dovecot (backend) - all backad have
> this same login_trusted_networks
>
>
Why would you even u
On 6.3.2019 10.24, Maria Arrea via dovecot wrote:
> We are happy users of Dovecot 2.3.4.1 . We run a cronjob that deletes
> from Trash messages older than 15 days, this is the command we run:
>
> //usr/bin/doveadm expunge -u $USER mailbox Trash savedbefore 15d/
>
> But this commands does NOT d
On 7.3.2019 2.02, Helmut K. C. Tessarek via dovecot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was womdering, if anyone has experienced the same issues. When I run the
> tests after compiling 2.3.5, the following 4 tests fail:
>
> http payload echo (ssl): sequential .. : ok
> http payload
Hi,
we're running Doveocot 2.3.4.1 with Pigeonhole, from repo.webflow.org.
As far as I understand the RFC for 'fileinto', the following Sieve
script should move a message either into the folder "SPAM" or "MaybeSPAM":
require ["fileinto"];
# rule:[SPAM]
if header :contains "subject" "SPAMSPAM
On 2019-03-07 02:47, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> We'll look into it. It's not usually failing for us, is it failing
> consistently or randomly?
It is failing consistently. I ran the tests 4 times. It always errors out at
the same tests with the same error messages.
Going to bed now. Will be ab
On 2019-03-07 02:52, Michael Goth via dovecot wrote:
> require ["fileinto"];
> # rule:[SPAM]
> if header :contains "subject" "SPAMSPAM"
> {
> fileinto "SPAM";
> }
> # rule:[SPAMSPAM]
> if header :contains "subject" "SPAM"
> {
> fileinto "MaybeSPAM";
> }
>
>
> But when I receive a message
18 matches
Mail list logo
