Hi!
I am planning to add foreman component to dovecot core and I am hoping
for some feedback:
Foreman - generic per-user worker handling component
It is responsible for managing worker pools per protocol, lifecycle
management of workers and handing out instances to others, as in, unix
socket con
--
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:58:49 +1100
From: Timo Sirainen
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: Reappearing emails - IMAP trace
Message-ID:<4c26cc22-7c7d-4d91-a767-4e5b3d1f1...@iki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
What mailbox format do
I'm using Dovecot's sieve extensions quite happily, they are very good!
Thanks for all who worked on them. I have a question that maybe is
appropriate for a sieve-specific discussion list, so if there is one I
should post to instead, please let me know:
I've poked through the sieve vacation RFC
On 19-04-16 20:01, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> I'm using Dovecot's sieve extensions quite happily, they are very good!
> Thanks for all who worked on them. I have a question that maybe is
> appropriate for a sieve-specific discussion list, so if there is one I
> should post to instead, please let me
Am 19.04.2016 um 20:55 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
> On 19-04-16 20:01, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
>> I'm using Dovecot's sieve extensions quite happily, they are very good!
>> Thanks for all who worked on them. I have a question that maybe is
>> appropriate for a sieve-specific discussion list, so if there
Op 4/19/2016 om 8:01 PM schreef Bradley M. Kuhn:
> I'm using Dovecot's sieve extensions quite happily, they are very good!
> Thanks for all who worked on them. I have a question that maybe is
> appropriate for a sieve-specific discussion list, so if there is one I
> should post to instead, please
Op 4/19/2016 om 9:10 PM schreef Robert Schetterer:
> Am 19.04.2016 um 20:55 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
>> On 19-04-16 20:01, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
>>> I'm using Dovecot's sieve extensions quite happily, they are very good!
>>> Thanks for all who worked on them. I have a question that maybe is
>>> appr
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 14:49 +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> There was previous case where gssapi did not work with Thunderbird.
> It
> apparently has some problems with GSSAPI usage.
I'm using Evolution; but note the telnet session. I'll beat mail
clients into submission later.
I found the problem:
This might be something that everybody thinks of as a well-known fact,
but I've been searching around quite a bit without finding anything
definitive. Maybe I just have the wrong idea of what's supposed to be
going on.
I'm using maildir+ quotas. For arriving mail, it works as I expect: new
li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Aki Tuomi wrote:
Hi Aki,
I am planning to add foreman component to dovecot core and I am hoping
for some feedback:
Foreman - generic per-user worker handling component
It is responsible for managing worker pools per protocol,
10 matches
Mail list logo
