On 10/03/15 11:40, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I think it's pure chance that it happens to crash that way. I don't
see how the duplicate checking could have affected this crash.
Oh! Do you mean Timo, that Computer Science is non-deterministic! Is
there chance, therefore luck, to it? Just kidding!
Th
On 03/11/2015 07:17 AM, E.B. wrote:
Might be unpredictable caching. Might be the error didn't go away
last time I recreated due to different methods of creating the files.
Who knows, I think I should give up and stop spamming the list
with uneducated guesswork.
No - no spam at least for me.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10-03-15 18:20, Chris Adams wrote:
> I see this has been asked a few times over the years (but not in
> several years), and the response was along the lines of "maybe
> someday", so I figured I'd see if someday was here yet...
>
> I have a need t
On Tuesday 10 March 2015 18:38:40 Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 10-03-15 18:20, Chris Adams wrote:
> > I see this has been asked a few times over the years (but not in
> > several years), and the response was along the lines of "maybe
> > someday", so I figured I'd see if someday was here yet...
> >
>
Once upon a time, Tom Hendrikx said:
> You could drop the default realm completely, and create a second
> passdb lookup which uses only the username part to lookup credentials.
> This means that, as long as you have no conflicts as usernames
> 'j...@foo.com' vs 'j...@bar.com', you'd be able to sup
Hi,
I don't know if this is the correct term. Let me elaborate. From time to
time, I want to expunge (?) the mail folder so that users' Trash'd mails
don't occupy space. So, here are my questions:
1. Is this the correct term?
2. Is it a Good Idea™ to do it?
Thanks,
--
mto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses wrote:
I don't know if this is the correct term. Let me elaborate. From time to
time, I want to expunge (?) the mail folder so that users' Trash'd mails
don't occupy space. So, here are my questions:
1. I
On 3/12/2015 4:23 AM, E.B. wrote:
> I'll check on 0.4.6 and report if I see anything interesting,
> but I will assume for the moment that since personal scripts
> work in 0.4.6 that this log info won't be there. It is correct that
> there is no "sieve" file or directory in the user's home dir. This
On 12 March 2015 at 10:17, Steffen Kaiser
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses wrote:
>
> I don't know if this is the correct term. Let me elaborate. From time to
>> time, I want to expunge (?) the mail folder so that users' Trash
Hello,
i installed dovecot 2.11.1 on ubuntu
Linux dadd3041 3.16.0-30-generic #40-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jan 12 22:07:11 UTC
2015 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
To make it clear, architecture is PowerPC 64bit
Then i installed dovecot via apt-get. But the file
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/auth/libdriver_mys
How is it possible to have the dovecot.rawlog-directory outside the
mail_location? A link to another directory is not because it is checked
in rawlog.c S_ISDIR to directory.
On 03/12/2015 12:02 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 3/11/2015 11:10 AM, Olaf Hopp wrote:
Please see the thread with subject
"Sieve permissions issue following update"
I tested sucessfully a developper issue last month
on the hint of Stephan. Yesterday I started to test the currenr RCs.
First I was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Hardy Flor wrote:
How is it possible to have the dovecot.rawlog-directory outside the
mail_location? A link to another directory is not because it is checked in
rawlog.c S_ISDIR to directory.
Patch rawlog.c and recompile. :)
On 12 Mar 2015, at 05:48, E.B. wrote:
>
However, I do see that Sieve was accessing the user home directory
because for some reason now it just created a ".pki" directory
therein, which inside of it has an empty "nssdb" directory. That
never happened before...? Not a big proble
On 09 Mar 2015, at 13:07, Hardy Flor wrote:
>
> This easy to correct errors is unfortunately still exists.
> I once hung my solution, but I can only test on a system.
>
>
> # dovecot --version
> 2.2.16.rc1
> # doveadm -f table mailbox status "messages guid" -u flor_hardy "*"
> mailbox message
On 10 Mar 2015, at 16:24, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dovecot version: 2.2.15
>>> Tinycdb: 0.78
>>>
>>> I'm attempting to compile dovecot --with-cdb, but keep ge
On 11 Mar 2015, at 12:50, Hardy Flor wrote:
>
> When I change the option 'i' to the letter 'a' is everything as designed. Why
> is 'i' at this location the problem?
Fix & explanation: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/cd5fc6ff8027
Oops, also http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/aed1e8340e
On 11 Mar 2015, at 21:31, Felix Zandanel wrote:
>
> Although my MySQL installation is set up to use UTF-8 as the default charset
> on every level (config, database, table and field), and the character_set_*
> runtime variables all yield the value "utf8", it still seems that the mysql
> client
Getting "Segmentation Fault" When I run doveconf -a
Dan LaSota
Instructional Designer, UAF eLearning
(907) 451-4067
dan.las...@alaska.edu
http://elearning.uaf.edu
Am 12.03.2015 um 15:07 schrieb Dan LaSota:
Getting "Segmentation Fault" When I run doveconf -a
i don't
in other words: bad for you but what's the purpose of the information
without any debugging like strace?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I want running servers, not with each new version have to compile.
Am 12.03.2015 um 12:07 schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
Patch rawlog.c and recompile. :)
Am 12.03.2015 um 15:18 schrieb Hardy Flor:
I want running servers, not with each new version have to compile.
well, rpm-SPECs allow including of patches
if you rely on distribution packages you won't see a update even if
upstream would introduce a config option for years
Am 12.03.2015 um
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 10 Mar 2015, at 16:24, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dovecot version: 2.2.15
> >>> Tinycdb
When I set in the home-variable in the userdb-section on my request
directory and not used the home-dirctory in the configuration, have what
can be expected for other effects?
On 12 Mar 2015, at 16:49, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>>
>> Well, it was never supposed to be linked to anything except the dict
>> binary, allowing it to be used via the dict proxy. Changed:
>> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/16ff0
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.16.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.16.tar.gz.sig
A few fixes and some imapc improvements since the release candidate.
* dbox: Resyncing (e.g. doveadm force-resync) no longer deletes
dovecot.index.cache file. The cach
For this no man-page available.
Am 12.03.2015 um 18:30 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
+ doveadm: Added "save" command to directly save mails to specified
mailbox (bypassing Sieve).
/usr/lib64/dovecot/stats/libstats_mail.so
why in the world a new sub-directory containing just one so-file
enforcing pakcage buildsers to change SPEC files?
Am 12.03.2015 um 18:30 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.16.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dove
Hello list,
I recently had a user whose mailbox had gone out of sync.
Webmail and client inbox totals had become vastly different and response
times had become unacceptable.
A doveadm force-resync fixed the problem nicely.
This will no doubt happen again as we grow the service and I would like
Hi.
I am seeing the following in my logs. Happy to downgrade to an earlier
version if you think this might be the problem, but dovecot.org is
extremely slow (and has been for months) so I found it easier just to
pull the latest from mercurial.
Thanks.
Laeeth
Mar 12 20:48:39 indexer: Erro
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dovecot/80062
On 03/12/2015 02:07 PM, Dan LaSota wrote:
> Getting "Segmentation Fault" When I run doveconf -a
Have a look at http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html and try again.
Regards,
Pascal
--
The trapper recommends today: f007ba11.1507...@localdomain.org
On 3/12/2015 11:56 AM, Olaf Hopp wrote:
> On 03/12/2015 12:02 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>> On 3/11/2015 11:10 AM, Olaf Hopp wrote:
>>> Please see the thread with subject
>>> "Sieve permissions issue following update"
>>> I tested sucessfully a developper issue last month
>>> on the hint of Stephan.
I will try. thanks.
Dan LaSota
Instructional Designer, UAF eLearning
(907) 451-4067
dan.las...@alaska.edu
http://elearning.uaf.edu
> On Mar 12, 2015, at 5:34 PM, Pascal Volk
> wrote:
>
>> On 03/12/2015 02:07 PM, Dan LaSota wrote:
>> Getting "Segmentation Fault" When I run doveconf -a
>
> Have a
Cliff Hayes writes:
I recently had a user whose mailbox had gone out of sync.
Webmail and client inbox totals had become vastly different and response
times had become unacceptable.
A doveadm force-resync fixed the problem nicely.
This will no doubt happen again as we grow the service and I wo
Thanks.
I use dovecot's lda and dovecot's sieve filter.
So it looks like I need to compare the index/mailbox mtimes as you suggest.
What am I looking for?
I see that the indexes are updated when I run the resync.
I checked my mailbox (that was not resynced) and noticed that
dovecot.index last u
36 matches
Mail list logo
