R: Re: Duplicate messages

2014-12-16 Thread absolutely_f...@libero.it
Hi Miloš, unfortunately, I have no X-UIDL header in my mailboxes. Thank you >Messaggio originale >Da: ghostlovescor...@gmail.com >Data: 13/12/2014 10.25 >A: "absolutely_f...@libero.it", >Ogg: Re: Duplicate messages > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA256 > >On 12/12/14 09:39,

Dovecot lda Panic: file mail-transaction-log.c

2014-12-16 Thread Alessio Cecchi
Hi, I'm running: # 2.2.15: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.6 (3e924b1b6c5c+) # OS: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 x86_64 Debian 6.0.10 with mailbox in Maildir format and LDA to delivery new email (+ sieve for filter) on the server there is an email account that is used for "archive"

LDAP: Connection appears to be hanging, reconnecting

2014-12-16 Thread Matthias Egger
Hello List I have a strange problem here which i try to analyse, but i'm stuck. Maybe someone has a hint? What happened: A few weeks ago one of the LDAPS Servers which is not maintained by us has crashed. From that moment on, users could still login to check their emails, but they were not able t

Re: LDAP: Connection appears to be hanging, reconnecting

2014-12-16 Thread Simon Fraser
On 16/12/14 16:30, Matthias Egger wrote: What happened: A few weeks ago one of the LDAPS Servers which is not maintained by us has crashed. From that moment on, users could still login to check their emails, but they were not able to send any email through postfix (which uses smtpd_sasl_type =

Re: Dovecot lda Panic: file mail-transaction-log.c

2014-12-16 Thread Alessio Cecchi
Il 16/12/2014 17:07, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto: Hi, I'm running: # 2.2.15: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.6 (3e924b1b6c5c+) # OS: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 x86_64 Debian 6.0.10 with mailbox in Maildir format and LDA to delivery new email (+ sieve for filter) I found the pro

Re: Replication sieve scripts.

2014-12-16 Thread Hanns Mattes
Hi Am 15.12.2014 um 14:00 schrieb Hanns Mattes: > After the following upgrade, the sieve-scripts are replicated - very > good. I stand corrected. They are sometimes updated, sometimes not. I didn't have time for testing (and I don't see a system), but it's not reliably. I will report after some

replication - more than 2 servers?

2014-12-16 Thread Ron Cleven
We tested dovecot for a fair amount of time and decided finally to put it into production under CentOS 7 (we are running 2.2.10). I just joined the list, so I apologize for what is probably a question that has been answered many times, but I was wondering if there are any plans to implement re

Re: replication - more than 2 servers?

2014-12-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 16.12.2014 um 21:13 schrieb Ron Cleven: We tested dovecot for a fair amount of time and decided finally to put it into production under CentOS 7 (we are running 2.2.10). I just joined the list, so I apologize for what is probably a question that has been answered many times, but I was wonder

Re: replication - more than 2 servers?

2014-12-16 Thread l...@airstreamcomm.net
Dovecot replication will never scale until it implements some form of token ring topology where data is sharded. You should look at obox plugin for dovecot and some form of S3 compatible storage that can be available in multiple data centers. We are using (pithos.io) and the Cassandra database

dsync "Error: imapc: Remote server didn't send BODY[] for UID"

2014-12-16 Thread Randall Gellens
Anyone know what this means and what the implications are? Does this mean some messages are missing? $sudo dsync -D -v -f -R -o mail_fsync=never backup -u test imapc: ... dsync(test): Error: imapc: Remote server didn't send BODY[] for UID 266 in #somefolder -- Randall Gellens Opinions are pe