Hi,
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
>[...]
>
>so suse people may upgrade to sieve pigeonhole latest, contact them via
>mail etc
>[...]
I sent a mail to one of the Maintainers (darix) and they updated only an hour
later - very nice guy.
After the following upgrade, the sieve-scripts are replicated -
Hanns Mattes schrieb:
>Hi,
>
>Hanns Mattes schrieb:
>
>[replication not updating sieve rules]
>
JFTR; Upgrading to pigeonhole 0.4.6 seems to solve the problem.
Best regards
Hanns
Am 15.12.2014 um 14:00 schrieb Hanns Mattes:
> Hi,
>
> Robert Schetterer schrieb:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> so suse people may upgrade to sieve pigeonhole latest, contact them via
>> mail etc
>> [...]
>
> I sent a mail to one of the Maintainers (darix) and they updated only an hour
> later - very nice g
Hello Timo,
In order to plan a migration, I want to setup an IMAP proxy (proxy_maybe) with
a dovecot server (I'm running the old dovecot-2.1.15 but I could upgrade or use
a proxy
only dovecot-2.2.x server)/LDAP pass et userdb's.
I'm won't be in charge of the migration itself but I think the idea
Hi.
I wonder if there any plans of finishing "multiple passwords for single user"
feature?
Few months old thread mentioned this:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-July/097217.html
and even a patch that unfortunately was never finished
http://dovecot.org/patches/2.0/auth-multi-password-2.
Quoting Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz :
Hi.
I wonder if there any plans of finishing "multiple passwords for single
user"
feature?
Untill that happens (not that great) workaround exists:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/MultipleDatabases
No, just use multiple fields in SQL with IF statements.
Quoting Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz :
Hi.
I wonder if there any plans of finishing "multiple passwords for single
user"
feature?
Untill that happens (not that great) workaround exists:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/MultipleDatabases
Whoops misfired
Unless you want a single service t
Hello all,
I did an install following a HOWTO document that has a fair number of positive
reviews, but something went wrong along the way:
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-configure-a-mail-server-using-postfix-dovecot-mysql-and-spamassasin
I made a couple deviations. I o
Hello,
I have a segfault problem, and I can not resolve myself.
The details below (stack trace, config). Maybe important to reproduce,
everithing working well until I connect with SoGo ActiveSync (SoGo web, and
other IMAP clients are working well). So maybe the SoGo send something magical
> that I needed:
>
> namespace inbox {
> inbox = yes
> }
Hey,
I wonder where do you have set this namespace inbox ? in 10-mail.conf ?
> #
> # /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-mail.conf
> #
> mail_location = maildir:/var/mail/vhosts/%d/%n
> mail_privileged_group = mail
Do /var/mail/vhosts exists an
> I sent a mail to one of the Maintainers (darix) and they updated only an hour
> later - very nice guy.
>
> After the following upgrade, the sieve-scripts are replicated - very
> good.
>
> Best regards
>
> Hanns Mattes
Wow, very quick !
I love those kind of guys.
Regards,
--
CHUNKZ.NET - sc
On 12/11/14 06:06 PM, Wayne Andersen wrote:
From a windows 7 client if I do a telnet mail.mydomain.com 143 I get:
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 LOGIN-REFERRALS IDLE AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN]
Dovecot ready. ß--- do not see STARTTLS in the capability list.
From a linux client I get :
* OK [CAPABI
On 12/15/2014 at 12:26 PM, "Bertrand Caplet" wrote:
>
>> that I needed:
>>
>> namespace inbox {
>> inbox = yes
>> }
>
>Hey,
>I wonder where do you have set this namespace inbox ? in 10-
>mail.conf ?
>
The word 'namespace' does not appear in any file within the tree of
/etc/dovecot/
>
> The word 'namespace' does not appear in any file within the tree of
> /etc/dovecot/ This was a suggestion that was offered to me from the Postfix
> list when I was cleaning up my postfix installation, but I wasn't certain of
> which file it should be in (or if it even matters from the soft
I added the namespace to 10-mail.conf (that was the only change I made today).
And when I turned on dovecot (it had been stopped since yesterday) the message
immediately passed through. So yes, the namespace suggestion from the postfix
guy worked. I've been reading up on namespaces since the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Wayne Andersen wrote:
Log onto incoming mail server (IMAP): A secure connection to the server
cannot be established.
I have set the port to 143,993,995 none of them work, and the security to
TLS.
993 is IMAP-over-SSL, which i
16 matches
Mail list logo
