Hi.
Mostly annoying: I migrated from one machine to another, made sure the
target host worked as expected, updated mx records and - after a couple of
days - signed it off as good. This is just my private machine, no big deal
if something goes wrong..
Everything's fine? Good, let's migrate my
Le 28 mars 2014 à 17:12, Urban Loesch a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your fast help.
> Now pop3 works again without error.
>
> Thanks
> Urban
>
>
> Am 28.03.2014 15:03, schrieb Teemu Huovila:
>> Thats my bad. This commit should fix it
>> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/b0359910ec96. Tha
On 4/4/2014 11:18 πμ, Axel Luttgens wrote:
I'm still wondering... under which circumstances could the crash occur?
I was wondering the same thing. We are now running 2.2.12 in production
for two weeks (unpatched) and we have not seen such an error (despite
extensive use of POP3).
Regards,
Hello
On 04/04/2014 11:18 AM, Axel Luttgens wrote:
> I'm still wondering... under which circumstances could the crash occur?
This issue occurs whenever the function
src/pop3/pop3-commands.c:client_uidls_save() is called.
The function is called when:
The pop3 internal structure client->message_ui
Hi, I have this intermittant problem.
When sending an email it *sometimes* takes ages before the process
finishes. The process seems to hang in moving the message to the sent
items" folder". When I disable the IPv6 stack in the network config
(this is MS Windows 7), the hanging process immedialet
Le 4 avr. 2014 à 10:37, Teemu Huovila a écrit :
> Hello
>
> On 04/04/2014 11:18 AM, Axel Luttgens wrote:
>> I'm still wondering... under which circumstances could the crash occur?
> This issue occurs whenever the function
> src/pop3/pop3-commands.c:client_uidls_save() is called.
> The function i
Le 3 avr. 2014 à 15:12, Pavel Stano a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> we have 2 netapp arrays with 2 volumes and we need to store our mail
> data in one or other volume for every user.
> We want keep data for one user in one volume only.
>
> So we would like to have 2 separate mail_attachment_dir, one on e
On 31/3/2014 12:03 μμ, Simon Fraser wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 11:58 +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>Question 2a: What do options "-d -N -l 30 -U" signify in
>"replication_dsync_parameters = -d -N -l 30 -U"?
I'd also be interested to know the answer to this part. I found mention
of the '-f' o
Hello Timo,
Why send a mail to the mailing list if you are addressing a single
person?
On 2014-04-04 11:42, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 31/3/2014 12:03 μμ, Simon Fraser wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 11:58 +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>Question 2a: What do options "-d -N -l 30 -U" signify in
>"replication_dsync_parameters = -d -N -l 30 -U"?
I'd also be interested to know the answer to
On 4/4/2014 1:17 μμ, Alan McGinlay wrote:
It does appear to be completely undocumented,
We would appreciate if Timo can kindly provide us with -at least- some
details!
I tried looking in the source code but just ended up going in circles
(i'm not familiar with it at all).
I faced the sa
On 4/4/2014 12:07 μμ, Egbert wrote:
When sending an email it*sometimes* takes ages before the process
finishes. The process seems to hang in moving the message to the sent
items" folder". When I disable the IPv6 stack in the network config
(this is MS Windows 7), the hanging process immedialet
Hello Alex,
overriding it from user database works perfectly.
Thanks
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11:22:37 +0200 Axel Luttgens
wrote:
> Le 3 avr. 2014 à 15:12, Pavel Stano a écrit :
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > we have 2 netapp arrays with 2 volumes and we need to store our mail
> > data in one or other volum
On 04/04/2014 12:42 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> Anyone please?
>
> How can we determine whether we need to configure
> "replication_dsync_parameters = -d -N -l 30 -U" as indicated on the wiki2 (or
> some variation thereof) or not?
I am definitely not Timo, but I will try a short answer based on
On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 15:34 +0300, Teemu Huovila wrote:
> -d Use a default location for the replica. As far as I can tell this is
> obtained from userdb variable mail_replica.
> -N Sync all (visible?) namespaces (only makes sense when syncing with a
> remote host, with potentially different name
Hi
On 04/04/2014 03:38 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
> It does help, thank you. Do you also know what the '-f' option does?
According to the dsync-man page it:
Makes dsync run in "full sync" mode rather than "fast sync" mode. In fast sync
mode dsync might skip syncing a mailbox, if both
locations had
Hello everybody,
I have a little pb with dovecot. I have been read on archive of dovecot mailing
list that it's possible to have 1 static userdb with LDAP passdb
(http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-November/055193.html) but when I
try it I have an error message and my message is on the
Hi guys,
I've installed dovecot 2.1.7 on a Debian Wheezy, tweaked some parameters
little bit, but I can't restart it (dovecot -n also fails) and get this
error:
doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file
/etc/dovecot/conf.d/90-acl.conf line 11: Unknown setting: plugin
doveconf: Error: managesie
Hi
- where did I fail (ignoring the backups, please. That's .. something I
know)
From the man page: "backup - Backup mails from default mail location to
location2 (or vice versa, if -R parameter is given). No changes are ever
done to the source location. Any changes done in destination are
Hi,
without having any further information, it sounds as if for example a
brace ( {} ) is
not closed correctly. You may want to check that any block is complete.
Cheers,
Philipp
Am 04.04.2014 16:10, schrieb Patrik Karisch:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've installed dovecot 2.1.7 on a Debian Wheezy, tweaked
Hi,
Am 2014-04-04 17:34, schrieb Philipp Resch:
> Hi,
>
> without having any further information, it sounds as if for example a
> brace ( {} ) is
> not closed correctly. You may want to check that any block is complete.
you are right, forgot to uncomment a closing } in 20-managesieve.conf
Nice c
On 4/3/2014 1:28 PM, Emanuele Balla (aka Skull) wrote:
[...]
> The problem in short:
>
> Messages I expected to find in certain folders were simply not there,
> although sieve logs reported them as delivered in those same folders.
> By manually inspecting the maildir, I actually found the messages,
On 04/04/14 18:31, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Sieve doesn't add flags unless it is explicitly told to do so. The
> behavior you describe is therefore quite bizarre, especially since using
> removeflag seems to provide a workaround.
I know, or I wouldn't be so puzzled...
> What does your full Sieve
23 matches
Mail list logo
