Hi,
I have a userdb file set up in passwd-file format containing the
following entries:
>doveadm user test1*te...@test.com
test1-te...@test.com
test1éte...@test.com
test1@te...@test.com
test1%te...@test.com
I can access the 1st entry (no special characters) no problem:
>doveadm user test1-te.
Hello,
I am using using dovecot 2.1.7 from debian stable:
namespace inbox {
inbox = yes
location =
mailbox Drafts {
special_use = \Drafts
}
mailbox Junk {
special_use = \Junk
}
mailbox Spam {
special_use = \Junk
}
mailbox Sent {
special_use = \Sent
}
mailbox
Hello,
I plan a migration to dovecot and have concerns about the amount of logged data.
On a testsystem dovecot produced 1TB syslog per day with a comparable amount of
pop3 sessions.
The current server log to STDOUT which is connected to multilog
(circular buffer, http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/mul
On 14/10/2013 12:41, Andreas Schulze wrote:
Hello,
I plan a migration to dovecot and have concerns about the amount of logged data.
On a testsystem dovecot produced 1TB syslog per day with a comparable amount of
pop3 sessions.
The current server log to STDOUT which is connected to multilog
(ci
Am 14.10.2013 12:45 schrieb Ben:
> >The current server log to STDOUT which is connected to multilog
> >(circular buffer, http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/multilog.html)
> >That way I can have a look at the last activities to any time.
> What's wrong with good old sysslog, or why don't you use Splunk or
Hi,
writing >1 TB per day sounds not wise.
Use syslog-ng or similar to define log destinations to STDOUT / STDIN
like multilog and omitting the "write to disk" part.
E.g., using syslog-ng with the MongoDB target and a capped collection
enables a similar circular buffer with the search t
Am 14.10.2013 13:57 schrieb Anton Dollmaier:
> Use syslog-ng or similar to define log destinations to STDOUT /
> STDIN like multilog and omitting the "write to disk" part.
solved by changing syslog-ng.conf:
- destination pop3 { file("/path/to/pop3.log"); };"
+ destination pop3 { program("multilog
Hi,
i tried to use lmtp proxy to a cyrus-server where i need authentication.
My passdb lookup gives me:
user=mail...@cyrus.serv.erhost=192.168.1.1 proxy=Y pass=secret
destuser=cyrus_lmtp_master
As i see in packettrace to the lmtp-cyrus-server the dovecot-proxy
didn't try any au
Well my last email went unaswered - I assume because I didn't provide
enough detailed information. Not a surprise if that is the case. Anyway,
I also noted that there is no dovecot/pop3 process like there is for IMAP.
Not certain that is wrong, but I am guessing it is. I am enclosing the
outpu
Hi,
I have a dovecot IMAP server (version 2.1.7) with Maildirs and a virtual
user setup (e.g. all accounts are mapped to the same system user). I’d
like to create a public namespace shared between users A and B, but not
any other user.
I tried to set up the namespace as follows:
namespac
H,
Am Montag, den 14.10.2013, 11:22 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> How can I make sure that other users
> cannot observe that this namespace exists?
something else that I tried since is to set "list = no" in the esttings
of "namespace feeds", and add "userdb_namespace/feeds/list=yes" to the
pa
Hello,
from my understanding, using 1024bit DH parameters results in a not
sufficiently secure key exchange for DH(E). Therefore I think it would
be advisable to have parameters of at least 2048bit . In fact, I would
see a great benefit in chosing parameter length arbitrarily.
I also do not
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:24:45AM -0400, Arnon Weinberg wrote:
> I have a userdb file set up in passwd-file format containing the
> following entries:
> >doveadm user test1*te...@test.com
> test1-te...@test.com
> test1éte...@test.com
> test1@te...@test.com
> test1%te...@test.com
snip
> I believe t
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:16:06AM -0400, Thomas I Higgins wrote:
> Well my last email went unaswered
Not so. You got two replies. If you are not going to read your
replies, you cannot be helped.
> - I assume because I didn't provide enough detailed information.
Both replies noted this. One ask
Am 14.10.2013 18:58, schrieb /dev/rob0:
> In addition to the ignored replies in the other thread, I'll ask
> this: why do you want to use POP3? IMAP can do everything POP3 can
> do, and it's superior in many ways. POP3 should have died out a
> decade ago
say who?
you want to provide storage, b
otherwise I have to figure out how to get it in text form
Yes, you should.
Try something like:
#!/bin/sh
( dovecot -an && echo) | /bin/mail -s "Dovecot -an output"
y...@yourdomain.com
Put the above two lines in an executable file (chmod 777 or something
like that and erase after you r
I am interested in the possibility of using Dovecot IMAP/POP proxying
capabilities to analyze emails that are passing through and possibly
modify content on the fly. This subject has been discussed here [1]
before.
I have tried the mail-filter plugin [2], but the hooks it uses are only
called i
Hi,
i'm using Dovecot 2.1.7 (Debian Wheezy) and output from LIST command looks
strange:
C: 4 LIST () "" (INBOX INBOX.Karantena INBOX.Spam) RETURN (STATUS (UNSEEN))
S: * LIST () "." "INBOX"
S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Karantena"
S: * STATUS "INBOX.Karantena" (UNSEEN 0)
S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Spam"
S
Quoting azurIt :
i'm using Dovecot 2.1.7 (Debian Wheezy) and output from LIST command
looks strange:
C: 4 LIST () "" (INBOX INBOX.Karantena INBOX.Spam) RETURN (STATUS (UNSEEN))
S: * LIST () "." "INBOX"
S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Karantena"
S: * STATUS "INBOX.Karantena" (UNSEEN 0)
S: * LIST () ".
>Quoting azurIt :
>
>> i'm using Dovecot 2.1.7 (Debian Wheezy) and output from LIST command
>> looks strange:
>>
>> C: 4 LIST () "" (INBOX INBOX.Karantena INBOX.Spam) RETURN (STATUS (UNSEEN))
>> S: * LIST () "." "INBOX"
>> S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Karantena"
>> S: * STATUS "INBOX.Karantena" (UNSEE
Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone knows what are best practices for correlating
logs between Postfix and Dovecot ?
I am having setup with postfix + amavisd + spamassassin + dovecot and
everything looks like a charm for few years now.
However, when e-mail arrives to my system, postfix is sen
On 15/10/2013 02:58, /dev/rob0 wrote:
In addition to the ignored replies in the other thread, I'll ask
this: why do you want to use POP3? IMAP can do everything POP3 can
do, and it's superior in many ways. POP3 should have died out a
decade ago.
Not sure what country he's in, but I'll comment
22 matches
Mail list logo