I've configured the dspam anti spam plugin, but it doesn't appear to be doing
anything when I move mail between mailboxes. Can anyone help me determine
what's going on?
The plugin appears to be loading; at least if I don't define all the required
configuration options I get a complaint in the l
Hi everyone,
as I have often trouble with OCFS2 I want to switch to NFS but
I'm not sure how to rebuild my cluster with regard to locking
and indexing problems.
By now my I have a four server configuration (there are another 2
servers for outgoing mail but they can be ignored):
MTA(MX10) --(lmt
Hi,
in our dovecot 2.0 setup with shared folders, users can make dovecot
create directories outside their mail directory. Which is a bit scary imho.
The following command:
. create inbox.shared.abc123
or even
. create "inbox.shared.strange &ANY- characters"
-- even though it will fail wit
Il 30/03/2012 13.31, Patrick Westenberg ha scritto:
Hi everyone,
as I have often trouble with OCFS2 I want to switch to NFS but
I'm not sure how to rebuild my cluster with regard to locking
and indexing problems.
By now my I have a four server configuration (there are another 2
servers for outg
Sorry to respond to an old post, but I've just recently begun implementing
multiple instances to facilitate our director proxies running along with
our normal dovecot config on the same servers in the cluster.
This is a VERY useful feature Timo, it may need just a little refinement.
On Mon,
I've recently set up a director proxy environment on my test servers, with
the intention of deploying on our cluster soon.
One thing I found confusing in the proxying documentation [1] was the
first bit about their being two ways to do the authentication...either you
have the proxy forward the
Am 2012-03-30 02:07, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
has anyone a clue how to fix this problem in the source code?
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/078697a32109 should fix it.
thanks! -- now it works! :)
On 30.3.2012, at 16.03, Andy Dills wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> # doveadm instance remove proxy
>
> Hmm...maybe I'm doing something wrong or expecting the wrong behavior, but
> when I do this, while it dissapears from doveadm, it still responds to
> pop/imap requests,
On 30.3.2012, at 15.38, Nick Warr wrote:
>> As far as I understood I will get poor performance if I'd just switch
>> from OCFS2 to NFS (while keeping this configuration) with 4 hosts
>> accessing the NFS-share and the index files on it and it is recommended
>> to assign users to a specific host (h
On 30.3.2012, at 16.25, Andy Dills wrote:
> However, when we have the front-end server do a static director proxy, the
> problem is that authentication failures are logged on the back-end server
> with a source IP of the proxy, and no authentication failure with the
> client IP address is logge
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 30.3.2012, at 16.25, Andy Dills wrote:
>
> > However, when we have the front-end server do a static director proxy, the
> > problem is that authentication failures are logged on the back-end server
> > with a source IP of the proxy, and no authenti
On 30.3.2012, at 17.51, Andy Dills wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On 30.3.2012, at 16.25, Andy Dills wrote:
>>
>>> However, when we have the front-end server do a static director proxy, the
>>> problem is that authentication failures are logged on the back-end server
>
Nick Warr schrieb:
I think some of the new Dovecot (director?) software is user aware, but
I don't know if it's quite ready for production.
Yes, with director it should be something like that:
MTA --(lmtp)--\ /--(lmtp)--> backend1 --\
-- director --
I'm excited to hear that dovecot now supports imap as a mailbox type.
I've got a mailbox over on another imap server, which I want to migrate to
dovecot. I was wondering whether I could use 'doveadm backup' to setup a two
way synchronisation process between the old imap mailbox and the new dovec
On 30.3.2012, at 22.44, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote:
> I'm excited to hear that dovecot now supports imap as a mailbox type.
>
> I've got a mailbox over on another imap server, which I want to migrate to
> dovecot. I was wondering whether I could use 'doveadm backup' to setup a two
> way synchron
On 30 Mar 2012, at 20:52, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 30.3.2012, at 22.44, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote:
>
>> I'm excited to hear that dovecot now supports imap as a mailbox type.
>>
>> I've got a mailbox over on another imap server, which I want to migrate to
>> dovecot. I was wondering whether I
On 30.3.2012, at 22.55, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote:
>> One-way sync will work fine. Two-way sync might be a bit troublesome. For
>> redesigned dsync I've started thinking about kind of a 1,5-way sync. :) That
>> would make sure that all messages from A are copied to B and no messages are
>> dele
On 30 Mar 2012, at 20:59, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 30.3.2012, at 22.55, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote:
>
>>> One-way sync will work fine. Two-way sync might be a bit troublesome. For
>>> redesigned dsync I've started thinking about kind of a 1,5-way sync. :)
>>> That would make sure that all mess
On 30.3.2012, at 23.02, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote:
>> It does, but the two way sync mirroring relies on messages having GUIDs.
>> IMAP protocol doesn't have such a concept. I guess it could be kind of
>> emulated by using e.g. GUID = sha1(message header). The pop3-replication
>> plugin kind of
On 30 Mar 2012, at 21:08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 30.3.2012, at 23.02, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote:
>
>>> It does, but the two way sync mirroring relies on messages having GUIDs.
>>> IMAP protocol doesn't have such a concept. I guess it could be kind of
>>> emulated by using e.g. GUID = sha1(me
On 30.3.2012, at 23.26, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote:
>> I suppose to do it quick and dirty you could just copy&paste the
>> get_hdr_sha1() from http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/78317179b4af to
>> imapc code and have imapc_mail_get_special() use it for returning GUID.
>
> Do you think that th
On 30 Mar 2012, at 21:28, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 30.3.2012, at 23.26, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote:
>
>>> I suppose to do it quick and dirty you could just copy&paste the
>>> get_hdr_sha1() from http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/78317179b4af to
>>> imapc code and have imapc_mail_get_specia
I have seen this error msg too. Deleting the index files 'fixes' the
error messages in the log. The indexes seem to get corrupted sometimes,
when the client is logged doing: copy dest=Trash, delete, expunge
Ken
On 3/19/2012 9:00 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 20:42 +0100, PST
23 matches
Mail list logo
