Thanks Timo,
I just tried out the Director. One question is about the re-redirection. I
know director will redirect all the simultaneous requests from the same
user to only a single server at the same time. The question is how to
manage the time period after last connection to re-decide to redi
Hello Timo,
I can see these errors, but I'm not sure if they have something to do with my
problem:
...
Feb 8 12:04:57 XX dovecot: imap-login: Error: read(imap) failed:
Connection reset by peer
Feb 8 12:04:57 XX dovecot: imap-login: Error: read(imap) failed: Remote
closed connection (
Hi,
I'm glad to see my report finally arrive, thank you :)
On 09.02.2012 04:02, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Fixed now slightly differently than you:
No problem – I agree that my code was a bit kludgy.
I noticed that my original mail might be a bit unclear:
> while trying to investigate the bug I
On 9.2.2012, at 10.41, Héctor Moreno Blanco wrote:
> I can see these errors, but I'm not sure if they have something to do with my
> problem:
>
> ...
> Feb 8 12:04:57 XX dovecot: imap-login: Error: read(imap) failed:
> Connection reset by peer
> Feb 8 12:04:57 XX dovecot: imap-login:
On 9.2.2012, at 10.36, Andy YB Hu wrote:
> I just tried out the Director. One question is about the re-redirection. I
> know director will redirect all the simultaneous requests from the same
> user to only a single server at the same time. The question is how to
> manage the time period after l
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:48:09AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 7.2.2012, at 10.25, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
>
> > Feb 6 16:13:10 loadbalancer2 dovecot: lmtp(6601): Panic: file
> > lmtp-proxy.c: line 376 (lmtp_proxy_output_timeout): assertion failed:
> > (proxy->data_input->eof)
> ..
On 9.2.2012, at 14.56, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
>>> Should I try increasing LMTP_PROXY_DATA_INPUT_TIMEOUT_MSECS, or do you have
>>> any
>>> other ideas for what might be causing it ?
>>
>> The backend server didn't reply within LMTP_PROXY_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MSECS
>> (30 secs).
>
> It's actually
Hi,
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 16:49 +0200, Lutz Preßler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (recent 2.1alpha2 variant - my test setup known to Timo).
> No time to diagnose in depth at the moment, but I just noticed
> that SEARCHing in virtual mailboxes seems not to create lucene
> index content of its own but use th
Hi,
Considering the scenario, where you have some old account with a
different POP3 UIDL format and you migrate them to dovecot.
So these old UIDLs would be saved to dovecot-uidlist.
At some later time you want to introduce a virtual POP3 INBOX like
described on:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plu
Hello Timo,
There is no other problem as far as I know. That's why I think is has something
to do with dovecot. Specifically with the imap an imap-login process, as I
observe in the processes status.
Anyway, the system load is not high enough to cause these problems. However,
imap service doesn
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 15:35 +0100, Peter Mogensen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Considering the scenario, where you have some old account with a
> different POP3 UIDL format and you migrate them to dovecot.
>
> So these old UIDLs would be saved to dovecot-uidlist.
>
> At some later time you want to introduc
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 08:59 -0400, Jonathan SIegle wrote:
> Running dovecot version 2.0.11. To reproduce, open two imap sessions and
> issue a check command from each at the same time with new mail in the queue.
>
> 0 login testuser testpw
> 1 select inbox
> -- Deliver mail --
> 2 check
Finally
Hi,
Continuing this old thread:
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 22:46 -0600, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
> But as far as the NO for a non-silent STORE, it seems that RFC 4314
> [4] disagrees with you:
>
>STORE operation SHOULD NOT fail if the user has rights to modify
>at least one flag spe
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 16:04 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> On 1/25/2012 3:43 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> > On 1/25/2012 3:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >> On 26.1.2012, at 1.37, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> >>
> >>> Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using
> >>> Thunderbir
On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 10:08 +0100, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> plugin {
> quota = dict:user::file:%h/mdbox/dovecot-quota
> quota_rule = *:storage=1GB
> quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+10%%
> }
>
> Kick off a manual backup:
>
> $ dsync -u u...@domain.tld backup mdbox://mdbox
>
> This results in do
On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 04:35 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
> dsync -u tes...@example.com mirror maildir:/tmp/Maildir
> rm -rf Maildir && cp -a Maildir_org Maildir && chown -R 70010:70002 Maildir
> dsync -vu tes...@example.com mirror maildir:/tmp/Maildir
> dsync(tes...@example.com): Error:
> stat(/srv/m
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:52 +0200, Matthias Rieber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it's caused by a virtual folder:
>
> INBOX.IBX.Folder1
> INBOX.Ordner.Folder1
> INBOX.Ordner.Folder1.*
>OR (OR (OR HEADER FROM bar.com HEADER FROM bar.de) HEADER FROM
> foo.com) HEADER FROM barfoos.net NOT HEADER FROM r
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 14:13 +0200, Christoph Bussenius wrote:
> Some folders of user1, including the INBOX, have been shared using these IMAP
> commands:
> . login user1 XX
> . setacl INBOX user2 lrwstiekx
> . setacl box-a user2 lrwstiekx
>
> Now if we use telnet to log in as user2 and selec
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 14:59 -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> I'm guessing this is some bad interaction with sdbox and partial file
> downloads?
>
> I haven't read the code for this, but I would guess the dsync process isn't
> being atomic
> about file transfers, so it is leaving half-completed tra
On 9.2.2012, at 21.47, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I've anyway done several fixes in v2.1. Can you try if these problems
> happen with it too? And in any case cleanup the dbox from the *.broken
> files, so that "doveadm force-resync" won't give any errors.
A bit more specifically: The last such dbox b
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 9.2.2012, at 21.47, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I've anyway done several fixes in v2.1. Can you try if these problems
happen with it too? And in any case cleanup the dbox from the *.broken
files, so that "doveadm force-resync" won't give any errors.
A bi
OK.
One more question. Now, the director and backend server are running on the
same servers, I set it up according to
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/RunningDovecot#Running_Multiple_Invocations_of_Dovecot
. The question is how to use doveadm to manage the different instances? I
know there is dovecot -c
22 matches
Mail list logo