On 3/1/2011 6:42 PM, Informatik.hu wrote:
Hi All!
I have got some problem with dovecot sieve. (from Debian Squeeze
packages).
I have already installed dovecot and postfix with mysql(postfix admin)
virtual domains and users, configured dovecot deliver for delivery
method in postfix.
Dovecot
On 3/4/2011 3:18 AM, Samuel Hassine wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to deploy Dovecot with Sieve support and I choose the easy
way: install ManageSieve.
But I have a problem here, and I did not find how to deal with.
I tested the communication to the server with the telnet command. Here
the resu
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Game Stores Group Limited, registered number 1937170, registered in England
Hi there,
I've had a look through the wiki and a quick look through the source for
penalty configurations (dovecot 2.0.9) but I've not found anything to do
with configuration options for this functionality. I'm basically wanting
to disable a particular host/subnet from the penalty setup. In ou
Please consider brain cells before sending it too..
On 3/4/2011 5:18 AM, Rob Coward wrote:
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Game Stores Group Limited, registered number 1937170, registered in England
--
Ken Anderson
Pacific Internet - http://www.pacific.net
Hi guys
Im viewing how to repair a problem using a postfix platform with openldap
and dovecot. This is the problem:
-When I create a new user inside openldap with mail account appears
correctly inside ldap but when I access first time appears inside
/var/spool/dovecot/ the folder of account bad.
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 12:16 +0200, Mark Zealey wrote:
> I've had a look through the wiki and a quick look through the source for
> penalty configurations (dovecot 2.0.9) but I've not found anything to do
> with configuration options for this functionality. I'm basically wanting
> to disable a p
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 14:53 +0100, francwal...@gmx.net wrote:
> In one account on my server all mails are unread all the time. If i
> set them as read in my client (IMAP with Mac Mail 4.4 or IMAP with
> Squirrelmail, it doesn’t matter) they seem to be checked as read for
> some minutes or less, bu
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.10.tar.gz.sig
I thought it was finally time to make a new v2.0 release. Or probably it
was a while ago already, but I've been a bit lazy this year. Maybe it's
because this is the first time in last 5
Hmm. Is there any reason why it wouldn't show up for me, when I'm 99% positive
we were hitting the max & still having new connections come in?
Here's what I get when I grep my logs for those statements:
servername:~# cd /var/log
servername:/var/log# ls mail.*
mail.errmail.err.2.gz mail.err.
Anybody know the answer to this one?? Any thoughts? I haven't received a
response yet.
Thanks,
-
Doug Mortensen
Network Consultant
Impala Networks
P: 505.327.7300
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Mortensen [mailto:d...@impalanetworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 2:29 PM
To: dove
Awesome. Just to confirm, if upgrading from 2.0.9 built from your source, all
that we should need to do is download, extract, then:
./configure
make
stop dovecot services
make install
start dovecot services
Correct?
Thanks,
-
Doug Mortensen
Network Consultant
Impala Networks
P: 505.327.7300
Hi all,
Any thoughts about this error? Should I file a bug report somewhere?
Cheers, Chris.
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
Hi all,
I can send myself a test message that causes Dovecot to crash when I open
it in Alpine, with the following error:
Jan 12 14:52:52 one-mail dovecot
On 4.3.2011, at 22.31, Douglas Mortensen wrote:
> This morning on our newly built server, the following was logged twice:
> auth: Error: pam(username,127.0.0.1): pam_authenticate() failed:
> Authentication failure (/etc/pam.d/dovecot missing?)
>
> This also happened to be during a time of 100+ i
I think I fixed this in v2.0.10. Hmm. Yeah. I think
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/079a81fb5117 fixed it.
On 4.3.2011, at 22.50, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Any thoughts about this error? Should I file a bug report somewhere?
>
> Cheers, Chris.
>
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Chris Wils
Thanks for the input Ed. The evening before you sent the message, I actually
had decided to do just what you recommended (stick with what we know). We have
since put the server into production, and things are working well. We built to
a physical box, rather than a VM. I do like xen VMs myself. W
On 4.3.2011, at 22.45, Douglas Mortensen wrote:
> Awesome. Just to confirm, if upgrading from 2.0.9 built from your source, all
> that we should need to do is download, extract, then:
>
> ./configure
> make
> stop dovecot services
> make install
> start dovecot services
>
> Correct?
That's abo
On 4.3.2011, at 23.05, Douglas Mortensen wrote:
> I guess to get more specific, some of the questions I have regarding dbox vs.
> mdbox are:
>
> 1. What is the advantage to using multiple files?
mdbox in theory uses less disk I/O for "normal users".
> 2. What is the advantage to using a single
Things broke a couple of months back and I thought I had caught the
repository at a bad time, but trying again today, after having seen that
people had been working on it recently, bore the same result.
../../../../libtool: line 2072: cmd-vacation.c: command not found
I'm simply syncing with the
Op 4-3-2011 23:56, interfaSys sàrl schreef:
Things broke a couple of months back and I thought I had caught the
repository at a bad time, but trying again today, after having seen that
people had been working on it recently, bore the same result.
../../../../libtool: line 2072: cmd-vacation.c: c
On 04/03/2011 23:19, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Op 4-3-2011 23:56, interfaSys sàrl schreef:
>> Things broke a couple of months back and I thought I had caught the
>> repository at a bad time, but trying again today, after having seen that
>> people had been working on it recently, bore the same resul
Op 5-3-2011 0:36, interfaSys sàrl schreef:
On 04/03/2011 23:19, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Remind me: what system was this again? What libtool/automake/etc.
versions?
FreeBSD 8.2 AMD64
autoconf-2.68
automake-1.11.1
gmake-3.81
libtool-2.4
m4-1.4.15
On this end:
Debian testing; Linux version 2.6.3
On 05/03/2011 00:38, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Op 5-3-2011 0:36, interfaSys sàrl schreef:
>>
>> On 04/03/2011 23:19, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>>> Remind me: what system was this again? What libtool/automake/etc.
>>> versions?
>> FreeBSD 8.2 AMD64
>> autoconf-2.68
>> automake-1.11.1
>> gmake-3.81
>> libt
> Does it work when you clone a fresh repository?
>
Yes, it did :)
I've immediately noticed that autogen didn't generate as much
information as earlier and then everything compiled fine.
Thank you for your help Stephan.
Cheers,
Olivier
Hi,
Just giving my own experience:
* I am using dovecot 2.0.9
(well, now 2.0.10 since today) in production without problems
* Sdbox
is using far too much I/O on a busy server, I had to switch to mdbox
*
Mdbox is running well so far, and resources (IO or CPU) are not an issue
anymore.
Hello,
I am in process of setting up an IMAP server (with postfix SMTP), I
installed RHEL 5.5 on my server and found that version of dovecot is
1.x.x while when I checked online RHEL 6 is version is 2.x.x.
Can someone please tell me if these two versions are still in
development or 1.x.x is very
26 matches
Mail list logo
