I have change main.cf with :
smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Debian/GNU)
biff = no
append_dot_mydomain = no
#my name server
myhostname = ns351550.ovh.net
readme_directory = no
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
mydestination = $myhostname, localhos
Hi,
we would have some accounting/monitoring of pop and imap sessions in our
dovecot servers,
which are the 'best' and fair way to do it? using some post-login
scripts, parsing the log file, using netstat ...
I know in the 2.0 version exists the doveadm who, but only relates to
imap sessions..
El 12/08/10 10:50, Xavier Pons escribió:
Hi,
we would have some accounting/monitoring of pop and imap sessions in
our dovecot servers,
which are the 'best' and fair way to do it? using some post-login
scripts, parsing the log file, using netstat ...
I know in the 2.0 version exists the doveadm
On 8/11/2010 4:06 AM, Jerrale G wrote:
On 8/11/2010 3:50 AM, Jerrale G wrote:
On 8/10/2010 3:16 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
chmod -R 775 /var/run/dovecot
dovecot &
Warning: Corrected permissions for login directory
/var/run/dovecot/login
ls -l /var/run/dovecot
srw-rw-rw- 1 root root 0 Aug 1
Hi everyone,
Two days ago I migrated from Courier to Dovecot 1.2.13. Everything went
smooth until the point I wanted to try some more features of Dovecot.
My working configuration contains just the one INBOX. private namespace.
Adding any other private namespaces (e.g. SHARE. with the configurati
I'm wondering if TTY=unknown should be consider as a warning or error. I'm busy
perfectioning the organisation's mail server. I want it to run without any
warning or error message.
==> /var/log/auth.log <==
Aug 12 11:37:15 h1690641 sudo: mail : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/var/spool/postfix
; USER=ro
Timo Sirainen put forth on 8/11/2010 12:55 PM:
> But yeah, if you haven't added any limits to how many connections users
> can create, I guess they could easily use up 128 connections.
IIRC, the default limit in 1.2 is 10 connections per IP--which IMO, for 99+%
of users, is 8 too many, maybe 9. ;
Jerrale G put forth on 8/11/2010 11:33 PM:
> Bradley, Answer Timo; he's a dovecot (something)rator
I think you're looking for the words "author" and "creator". Timo _is_
Dovecot--for better or worse. ;) He's much like Wietse in this regard. For
the most part, Dovecot and Postfix are "one man s
Kurt22 wrote on 12.08.2010:
> but now in my mail.log I have Relay access denied
> Aug 12 10:40:20 ns351550 postfix/smtpd[5332]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> web24408.mail.ird.yahoo.com[87.248.114.220]: 554 5.7.1
> : Relay access denied; from=
> to= proto=SMTP
> helo=
what's the output of
post
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Found my mistake. I set the prefix of the default namespace to "." Oo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkxj1q4ACgkQry4FmF2gI7EplQCeKcCO45soJh
I'm using Dovecot 2.0 rc5, installed by using the deb.packes from
xi.rename-it.nl/debian/dists/stable-auto/.
When sieve is enabled (see attached config) my imap-process crashs:
Aug 12 13:25:11 mail-archiv dovecot: imap: Debug: Loading modules from
directory: /usr/lib/doot/modules
Aug 12 13:25
On 12.8.2010, at 10.45, Frank van Amsterdam wrote:
> I'm wondering if TTY=unknown should be consider as a warning or error. I'm
> busy perfectioning the organisation's mail server. I want it to run without
> any warning or error message.
>
> ==> /var/log/auth.log <==
> Aug 12 11:37:15 h1690641
Hi guys,
I inherited a Dovecot 1.0.1, which I will have to upgrade, but until then I
need, if possible, to resolve a timeout.
- we have about 25 IMAP users
- the busiest user has about 100 000 messages (Maildir) in less than 100 folders
- the mail server is on HP server with server grade 2.5" HD
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 01:34:52PM +0200, Peer Heinlein wrote:
> protocols = lmtp imap sieve
Because 'sieve' is no protocol. Should be in the corresponding Delivery
Agent's settings like:
protocol lmtp {
mail_plugins = $mail_plugins sieve
}
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve/Dovecot
Regards
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 14:29 +0200, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 01:34:52PM +0200, Peer Heinlein wrote:
>
> > protocols = lmtp imap sieve
>
> Because 'sieve' is no protocol.
It is actually nowadays: IETF people decided to name ManageSieve port
and service name as "sieve", so P
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 01:36:06PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> It is actually nowadays: IETF people decided to name ManageSieve port
> and service name as "sieve", so Pigeonhole uses that name too now.
Oh yeah, there was that on the list some time ago. I stand corrected :)
Am Donnerstag 12 August 2010 schrieb Thomas Leuxner:
> > protocols = lmtp imap sieve
>
> Because 'sieve' is no protocol.
It is. That's the old "managesieve"-protocol.
> protocol lmtp {
> mail_plugins = $mail_plugins sieve
> }
That's where it *is* and imap isn't able to load his plugins:
Au
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 14:48 +0200, Peer Heinlein wrote:
> > protocol lmtp {
> > mail_plugins = $mail_plugins sieve
> > }
>
> That's where it *is* and imap isn't able to load his plugins:
But you've also enabled it for IMAP. It should only be enabled for LDA
and LMTP. You can check with:
dovec
The management decided to switch over to Zimbra so we will no longer be
using Dovecot...which served us exceedingly well. May Timo and the Dovecot
community prosper. Thanks for all the help from all of you in the years since
our switch from UW-IMAP.
--
"Grant us, in our direst need, the smal
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 14:28 +0200, Iv Ray wrote:
> The timeout we face is that sometimes even small messages take 20-40 seconds
> to open (i. e. Tunderbird 2 on Windows 7).
> Or connection to the mail server timeouts.
>
> Could you give me a few tips where can I look in order to detect the possib
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:52 +0200, Tamas Kadar wrote:
> I've ran into something rather nasty: if a user moves a mail from its
> inbox to a public folder, the folder becomes inaccessible for others,
> because the moved file will have the the permission 600 instead of 777
> (or 666) which the res
On 12.08.2010, at 14:59, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> Have you looked at if during the 20-40 seconds the disk I/O is high? If
> the problem is on server and not on network, it might be helpful to
> strace the process that's taking a long time to reply. Then it could
> show if it's mainly waiting for s
Really thanks for to help me.
postmap -q akairnet.com mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domaines.cf
> akairnet.com
mysql-virtual_domaines.cf
query = SELECT name FROM domains WHERE name = '%s'
in My table domains I have :
id namemaster last_check typenotified_serial
Kurt22 wrote on 12.08.2010:
> But in mail.log I have now a new problem T_T
>> connect to transport dovecot: Connection refused
> Aug 12 15:13:45 ns351550 postfix/master[19833]: daemon started -- version
> 2.5.5, configuration /etc/postfix
> Aug 12 15:17:42 ns351550 postfix/smtpd[20037]: connect f
In fact I don't have :s
but now in my mail.log -> local configuration error
Aug 12 16:35:19 ns351550 postfix/pipe[24171]: B06633BA9B:
to=, relay=dovecot, delay=0.11,
delays=0.07/0.01/0/0.03, dsn=5.3.5, status=bounced (local configuration
error). And so in dovecot log unknow user.
Do you think i
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 15:09 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > 3 list "" "FremdeOrdner/%/%"
> > * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "FremdeOrdner/user2/Drafts"
> > 3 OK List completed.
>
> The INBOXes should have been listed here.
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/4d8ae218af73
Kurt22 wrote on 12.08.2010:
> In fact I don't have :s
> but now in my mail.log -> local configuration error
> Aug 12 16:35:19 ns351550 postfix/pipe[24171]: B06633BA9B:
> to=, relay=dovecot, delay=0.11,
> delays=0.07/0.01/0/0.03, dsn=5.3.5, status=bounced (local configuration
> error). And so in
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 04:19 -0400, Jerrale G wrote:
> dict_driver_register(mysql): Already registered
What does "dovecot --build-options" say?
Congratulation Daniel it's Ok with in my dovecot.conf, I have to add :
protocol lda {
postmaster_address = postmas...@akairnet.com
}
So now I want to recieve and send a email. But it's strange because I have
always in my dovecot log passwd(cont...@akairnet.com, 91.121.76.71): unknown
use
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 17:51 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 04:19 -0400, Jerrale G wrote:
>
> > dict_driver_register(mysql): Already registered
>
> What does "dovecot --build-options" say?
No, actually, forget about that. It doesn't show what I wanted to see.
Instead show wh
On Aug 11, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Aug 10, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 10.8.2010, at 18.12, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
doveconf: Error: protocols: Unknown protocol: sieve
doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file dovecot/dovecot.conf:
protocols: Unk
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 18:58 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > > Jul 29 20:58:22 lda(w...@titan.co.ke): Info: msgid=<
> > > e1oexn8-000het...@mail.mediselkenya.com>: save failed to INBOX: BUG:
> > Unknown
> > > internal error
> >
> > I couldn't reproduce this, although I fixed a few other bugs.
Kurt22 wrote on 12.08.2010:
> So now I want to recieve and send a email. But it's strange because I have
> always in my dovecot log passwd(cont...@akairnet.com, 91.121.76.71): unknown
> user.
> So it not was the problem
hmm, maybe Dovecot tries to lookup the user also from /etc/passwd?
Befor I had :
userdb passwd {
}
And now :
# userdb passwd {
# }
And now I have not this message ! Perfect :)
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/passwd%28contact%40akairnet.com%2C91.121.76.71%29%3A-unknown-user-tp29409942p29421357.html
Sent from the Dovecot mailing
Jerrale G wrote:
> On 8/11/2010 7:27 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> If you are still in testing/eval stage (sounds like it), I would
>> recommend going with 2.0 unless there is a compelling reason not
>> to...
> I don't see any dovecot-2.0-managesieve; this is a requirement for us
> to upgrade.
S
On Aug 10, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 10.8.2010, at 18.12, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
doveconf: Error: protocols: Unknown protocol: sieve
doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file dovecot/dovecot.conf:
protocols: Unknown protocol: sieve
This looks as if you haven't instal
I just did a search through my archives - seems this topic has been
requested a few times since my posting two years ago. I asked about a
specific implementation - which Mr. Sirainen never commented on. He was
probably focused on something more important at the time - like a paying
job. So
On 8/12/2010 1:44 PM, Kurt22 wrote:
Befor I had :
userdb passwd {
}
And now :
# userdb passwd {
# }
And now I have not this message ! Perfect :)
--
Yeah, you commented out that config so that it will ignore it.
Jerrale G.
SC Senior Admin
Is there a reference manual for changes in configuration between
dovecot 1.2.X to 2.0 rc5. I know there is a config upgrade tool but I
would rather learn the new changes and then implement them?
--
Jerrale G.
Jerrale G.
SC Senior Admin
On 8/12/2010 11:28 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
Is there a reference manual for changes in configuration between
dovecot 1.2.X to 2.0 rc5. I know there is a config upgrade tool but I
would rather learn the new changes and then implement them?
dovecot 2.0 rc5:
./configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/l
40 matches
Mail list logo
