Burckhard Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
by accident I had configured inside 15-lda.conf
protocol lda {
mail_plugins = autocreate imap_acl acl
}
(I only wanted autocreate sieve.)
There ist a problem with the symbol hook_client_created:
lda: Error:
dlopen(/usr/dovecot-2.0.rc1/lib/dovecot/lib02_imap_
Dear Sirs,
I want to know if there is any possibility to log the subjects of the messages
downloaded from ther server. We use dovecot 1.0.15 with POP3S and IMAP and we
want to keep a trace of the reading of messages by the users of our mail server
(who, when and what are the subjects of the e-m
hi,
we are using the dovecot-rc1 version, and we are testing the director
service,
as there is little documentation on this service, a pair of questions..
if i'm not wrong, the proxy_maybe it's not implemented, yet? will be soon?
this limitation does not allow use the same two directors server
Hi,
I was just updating dovecot to nightly snapshot for Fedora rawhide, but got
following issue:
fts-backend-solr.c: In function 'fts_box_name_get_root':
fts-backend-solr.c:60: error: 'NAMESPACE_FLAG_INBOX' undeclared (first use in
this function)
fts-backend-solr.c:60: error: (Each undeclared id
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 12:26:54 Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just updating dovecot to nightly snapshot for Fedora rawhide, but got
> following issue:
> fts-backend-solr.c: In function 'fts_box_name_get_root':
> fts-backend-solr.c:60: error: 'NAMESPACE_FLAG_INBOX' undeclared (first u
On 7.7.2010, at 11.42, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
>> I was just updating dovecot to nightly snapshot for Fedora rawhide, but got
>> following issue:
>> fts-backend-solr.c: In function 'fts_box_name_get_root':
>> fts-backend-solr.c:60: error: 'NAMESPACE_FLAG_INBOX' undeclared (first use
>> in this func
On 7.7.2010, at 9.59, Sandu cucereanu wrote:
> I want to know if there is any possibility to log the subjects of the
> messages downloaded from ther server. We use dovecot 1.0.15 with POP3S and
> IMAP and we want to keep a trace of the reading of messages by the users of
> our mail server (who,
On 7.7.2010, at 10.59, Xavier Pons wrote:
> if i'm not wrong, the proxy_maybe it's not implemented, yet? will be soon?
I tried implementing it once, but it got difficult, so I'm not sure when it'll
be implemented.
> this limitation does not allow use the same two directors servers like mail
>
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 13:27:41 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 7.7.2010, at 11.42, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> >> I was just updating dovecot to nightly snapshot for Fedora rawhide, but
> >> got following issue:
> >> fts-backend-solr.c: In function 'fts_box_name_get_root':
> >> fts-backend-solr.c:60:
Hello,
has anyone a running setup for LMTP proxy and the director service ?
pop3/imap/managesieve is properly working, but i have problems with
LMTP. I set it up as described in the conf.d/10-director.conf
From the user_db i get proxy=y and no proxyhost as described for imap/pop3
But lmtp is
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 15:18 +0200, Oliver Eales wrote:
> From the user_db i get proxy=y and no proxyhost as described for imap/pop3
> But lmtp is complaining about the missing host:
This should help: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/4db258f7ce91
I'm trying to use a script to create a mailbox structure. I'm aware that the
structure should look like:
~/.maildir/.INBOX/{cur,tmp,new}
~/.maildir/.INBOX.Subfolder1/{cur,tmp,new}
~/.maildir/.INBOX.Subfolder2/{cur,tmp,new}
~/.maildir/.INBOX.Subfolder2.Subsubfolder1/{cur,tmp,new}
...
I have trie
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 11:35 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
> Apr 02 13:25:24 imap(m...@box): Error:
> creat(/var/tmp/Indexes/14/75/m...@box/dovecot.mailbox.log) failed: No
> such file or directory
Finally fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/6571b3a9c44f
> Mar 29 18:02:38 imap(m...@box): Erro
A. J. Giurato wrote:
I'm trying to use a script to create a mailbox structure. I'm aware
that the structure should look like:
~/.maildir/.INBOX/{cur,tmp,new}
~/.maildir/.INBOX.Subfolder1/{cur,tmp,new}
~/.maildir/.INBOX.Subfolder2/{cur,tmp,new}
~/.maildir/.INBOX.Subfolder2.Subsubfolder1/{cur,tmp
A. J. Giurato wrote:
I'm trying to use a script to create a mailbox structure. I'm aware
that the structure should look like:
~/.maildir/.INBOX/{cur,tmp,new}
~/.maildir/.INBOX.Subfolder1/{cur,tmp,new}
~/.maildir/.INBOX.Subfolder2/{cur,tmp,new}
~/.maildir/.INBOX.Subfolder2.Subsubfolder1/{cur,tmp
Thanks for the suggestions.
The user, group, and permissions on all folders (including the cur, new, and tmp) are "aj aj 700".
Also, I added "mail_location = maildir:~/.maildir" (and removed "default_mail_env").
Neither has worked.
Also, my IMAP folders all work fine except for the new ones
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:40 -0400, A. J. Giurato wrote:
> Also, my IMAP folders all work fine except for the new ones I want to
> create manually from the CLI.
Make sure it's not a client problem (shouldn't be if you tested also
with squirrelmail, but who knows):
http://wiki.dovecot.org/TestInsta
OK, Dovecot is showing those folders correctly from telnet.
However, I can't subscribe to them in Thunderbird 3.0.5 (they don't even
appear) and I don't even know that squirrelmail 1.4.13 has a subscribe feature.
Are there any other recommended clients I try this with?
On 7/7/2010 11:44 AM, T
On 07/07/2010 09:15 AM, A. J. Giurato wrote:
OK, Dovecot is showing those folders correctly from telnet.
However, I can't subscribe to them in Thunderbird 3.0.5 (they don't even
appear) and I don't even know that squirrelmail 1.4.13 has a subscribe
feature.
You did "refresh" the Folder list ..
I've completely closed and reopened Thunderbird many times, and I've hit
refresh too. Dovecot has been restarted multiple times. Squirrelmail has been
logged out and back in. Apache server serving squirrelmail has been rebooted.
++
| A. J. Giurato |
| a...@p
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 11:35 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> Apr 02 13:25:24 imap(m...@box): Error:
>> creat(/var/tmp/Indexes/14/75/m...@box/dovecot.mailbox.log) failed: No
>> such file or directory
>
> Finally fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/doveco
I'm experimenting with a 2.0 setup, using the sieve plugin for 2.0 from
mercurial.
Without sieve, everything seems to work fine. Once I put in a
.dovecot.sieve file, though, nothing gets delivered, with the only hint
of what's going wrong being this mess in syslog:
Jul 7 13:18:00 bellman doveco
On 2010-07-07 1:19 PM, Mark Moseley wrote:
> Going out of town tomorrow morning. I'll check when I get back. I'm
> eager to roll out 2.0rc1 (though beta5 has been completely stable for
> me) but didn't think it'd be a good idea right before I got on a plane
> :)
Aww, come on! Where's your sense of
A. J. Giurato wrote:
I'm trying to use a script to create a mailbox structure. I'm aware
that the structure should look like:
~/.maildir/.INBOX/{cur,tmp,new}
~/.maildir/.INBOX.Subfolder1/{cur,tmp,new}
~/.maildir/.INBOX.Subfolder2/{cur,tmp,new}
~/.maildir/.INBOX.Subfolder2.Subsubfolder1/{cur,tmp
It appears that the lda + sieve does not respect the userdb_mail
setting, though the imap server does(!?). Is this expected behavior?
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 10:19 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 11:35 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
> >> Apr 02 13:25:24 imap(m...@box): Error:
> >> creat(/var/tmp/Indexes/14/75/m...@box/dovecot.mailbox.log) failed: No
> >> such
I think there was a Thunderbird bug related to showing subfolders. It
was talked about here just a few (3-7?) days ago..
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 12:28 -0400, A. J. Giurato wrote:
> I've completely closed and reopened Thunderbird many times, and I've hit
> refresh too. Dovecot has been restarted mu
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 14:42 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> It appears that the lda + sieve does not respect the userdb_mail
> setting, though the imap server does(!?). Is this expected behavior?
Are you calling deliver with -d parameter? If not, it's not doing a
userdb lookup.
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:23 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Jul 7 13:18:00 bellman dovecot: lda(perry): Panic: file index-transaction.c:
> line 70 (index_transaction_init): assertion failed: (box->opened)
> Jul 7 13:18:00 bellman dovecot: lda(perry): Error: Raw backtrace:
> /usr/local/lib/dove
This is true. Sorry. That is how I have it. The .INBOX's directories are in
the root
.maildir/{cur,tmp,new}
The subscriptions file did it. As recommended by Rod, I added the mailbox
directories I was creating to .maildir/subscriptions. Now Thunderbird and
SquirrelMail see them.
Thanks to
Timo Sirainen writes:
> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 14:42 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>> It appears that the lda + sieve does not respect the userdb_mail
>> setting, though the imap server does(!?). Is this expected behavior?
>
> Are you calling deliver with -d parameter? If not, it's not doing a
>
On 2010-07-07 3:33 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:23 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>> Jul 7 13:18:00 bellman dovecot: lda(perry): Panic: file
>> index-transaction.c: line 70 (index_transaction_init): assertion failed:
>> (box->opened)
>> Jul 7 13:18:00 bellman dovecot: lda
Timo Sirainen writes:
> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:23 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>> Jul 7 13:18:00 bellman dovecot: lda(perry): Panic: file
>> index-transaction.c: line 70 (index_transaction_init): assertion failed:
>> (box->opened)
>> Jul 7 13:18:00 bellman dovecot: lda(perry): Error: Raw
"Perry E. Metzger" writes:
> Timo Sirainen writes:
>> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 14:42 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>>> It appears that the lda + sieve does not respect the userdb_mail
>>> setting, though the imap server does(!?). Is this expected behavior?
>>
>> Are you calling deliver with -d par
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:00 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Ah, but as the lda doesn't have privs to read the userdb, it can't read
> it anyway.
You can give it permissions. It's not done by default just in case
someone would put some sensitive information in there.
The sample Director configuration (10-director.conf) says that
director_servers and director_mail_servers can be lists of either IPs or
hostnames:
# List of IPs or hostnames to all director servers, including ourself.
# Ports can be specified as ip:port. The default port is the same as
# what dire
Perry E. Metzger wrote:
I'm experimenting with a 2.0 setup, using the sieve plugin for 2.0 from
mercurial.
Without sieve, everything seems to work fine. Once I put in a
.dovecot.sieve file, though, nothing gets delivered, with the only hint
of what's going wrong being this mess in syslog:
Jul
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:23 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
Jul 7 13:18:00 bellman dovecot: lda(perry): Panic: file index-transaction.c: line
70 (index_transaction_init): assertion failed: (box->opened)
Jul 7 13:18:00 bellman dovecot: lda(perry): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr
Jerry wrote:
I know that this is technically not a Dovecot problem; however, I was
wondering if anyone knew if 'sieve' had been updated with the ability
to 'forward as attachment' a received document. I believe it has the
ability to forward a document; however, I need the ability to forward
it as
List,
With sites like this appearing everywhere: http://www.dontfilterme.com and
http://nocleanfeed.com/
Just trying to get a general opinion with what everyone thinks of the
filtering situation in Australia. Whether you believe its a good thing or a
bad thing or you don't really care. I'm writin
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:21:42 +0200
Stephan Bosch articulated:
> I should include this in the man pages. Current exit codes are:
>
> 0 (EXIT_SUCCESS) All succeeded
> 1 (EXIT_FAILURE) Generic failure
> 64 (EX_USAGE) Invalid command line parameter
Thanks!
--
Jerry ✌
dovecot.u...@seibercom.net
This has NOTHING to do with Dovecot
I am an Australian, and are on other appropriate lists for such
discussions such as our communist dictatorship ALP govt power tripping,
but I'm afraid all you have done here, is SPAM, please do not do this
again.
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:21 +1000, Ryan Hallowa
Stephan Bosch writes:
> It is related to that change, yes. I fixed the problem, but I am still
> not entirely happy with the error handling of the store action.
It would be best, I think, if the system failed safe (i.e. if it did not
lose the user's mail in case of error, but rather stored it in
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 09:26 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Noel Butler put forth on 7/1/2010 4:46 PM:
>
> < snipped the juvenile stabs >
>
> > oh but as a parting shot, with all that mail we get, little spam, scams
> > or viruses gets to our users, that says we are doing something right,
> > and
Hello,
I'm testing Dovecot 2.0.
I plan to use Dovecot 2.0 with thousands of domains per server. My user
base is under virtual MySQL.
Is there a way to make the LMTP not make query to MySQL for each message
delivered ? I'm afraid that the MySQL server does not support the load.
Best Regards
--
Just an FYI - if I have a two-node director ring, I get this when I
start up the second node:
Jul 7 16:59:38 oh-popmap7 dovecot: director: Error: Received SYNC from
10.142.0.162:1234/left (seq=6) while already synced
Totally expected since it's already received the same SYNC from the
right side,
On 8.7.2010, at 1.02, Thiago Henrique wrote:
> Is there a way to make the LMTP not make query to MySQL for each message
> delivered ? I'm afraid that the MySQL server does not support the load.
It depends on your configuration.
a) Is the MySQL query needed at all? If everyone uses the same uid/g
On 8.7.2010, at 1.13, Brad Davidson wrote:
> Just an FYI - if I have a two-node director ring, I get this when I
> start up the second node:
>
> Jul 7 16:59:38 oh-popmap7 dovecot: director: Error: Received SYNC from
> 10.142.0.162:1234/left (seq=6) while already synced
>
> Totally expected sinc
Hi,
We have dovecot 1.1.20 running on Fedora 7 with mail and indexes on NFS. On
our delivery server we are getting "status=bounced (Command died with signal
6: "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver")"
We are fetching these mails from another server which has Centos 5.2
installed. We have mail_nfs*=y
* Noel Butler :
> *sigh*
>
> are you really this stupid or just trolling ?
Seriously, I think you should all go offlist with your insults. Stop stealing
other peoples attention with your dogmatic positions. Obviously you seem to
have opposite positions and all of you seem to have a strong opinion
50 matches
Mail list logo
