Hello,
i use working quotasystem with sql-quotadict.
The values stored in db are used to realize also a quotasystem in postfix to
reject mails if they are bigger then remaining quota.
if dataset in quotadict is missing for some reasons, postfix can't calculate
quota and mail gets delivered even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Andre Hübner wrote:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2009-March/038249.html
"Quota is updated whenever Dovecot is the one doing changes and quota
plugin is loaded."
Hmm, I would expect a quota recalculation, too, if there is
Hello,
1. remove the quota in the DB,
2. make same changes.
hmm, i see. but unfortunately this is not a way i can do. it would be
acceptable in private scope but not for bussinesscustomers.
to make a change i would manipulate customers maildata which is not allowed
this way.
a simple comman
On 03/08/2010 11:45 AM Andre Hübner wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> 1. remove the quota in the DB,
>> 2. make same changes.
>
> hmm, i see. but unfortunately this is not a way i can do. it would be
> acceptable in private scope but not for bussinesscustomers.
> to make a change i would manipulate customer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Pascal Volk wrote:
You found 'something'? If not, have a look at:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/Dict#Insert_used_quotas_to_the_new_table_after_upgrade_to_1.2.x
Oh, cool, so Dovecot does calculate the quota, if there is none in
Good afternoon list,
I'm really struggling making this feature work:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/Proxy
BTW. v2.0 can now do:
doveadm quota username recalc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I have always seen some people indicate they use MySQL for mailboxes
in Postfix and I wondered how difficult something like this would be?
I have 300 users on my company Postfix server right now. I am just
using Postfix, Dovecot (IMAP4 only), & Roundcube (Webmail). I have
MySQL loaded on the machin
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 10:52 -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> *PS* I was told that Dovecot doesn't support MySQL mailboxes. I think
> it does. Am I wrong?
Dovecot supports looking up user information from MySQL, but not
actually storing mails there. If you really wanted to store mails on
MySQL, you'
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Dovecot supports looking up user information from MySQL, but not
> actually storing mails there. If you really wanted to store mails on
> MySQL, you'd have to use dbmail instead of Dovecot.
Is it even worth it with less than 500 users? I mea
On 2010-03-08 10:52 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> *PS* I was told that Dovecot doesn't support MySQL mailboxes. I
> think it does. Am I wrong?
You're confusing 'mailboxes' with user mail 'settings' and/or user
management.
Dovecot does not currently support storing users mail in any sql
database, al
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 11:00 -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Dovecot supports looking up user information from MySQL, but not
> > actually storing mails there. If you really wanted to store mails on
> > MySQL, you'd have to use dbmail instead
On Mar 8, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Dovecot supports looking up user information from MySQL, but not
actually storing mails there. If you really wanted to store mails on
MySQL, you'd have to use dbmail instead of Dovecot.
I
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: dovecot-bounces+egbert=vandenbussche...@dovecot.org
> [mailto:dovecot-bounces+egbert=vandenbussche...@dovecot.org]
> Namens Bradley Giesbrecht
> Verzonden: maandag 8 maart 2010 17:06
> Aan: Carlos Mennens
> CC: Dovecot Mailing List
> Onderwerp: Re: [Dov
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.11.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.11.tar.gz.sig
mbox users really should upgrade, because by sending a message with a
huge header you could basically cause a DoS (this problem exists only
with v1.2.x, not with v1.0 or v1.1).
> What's going on? It's probably some totally stupid typo on my side.
Any comments on this? Anyone with a working date extension?
Hi,
unsure how to provide more useful information, as I can not get LMTP to create
a core dump. With the latest changes from Mercurial it dies upon message
delivery:
==> /var/log/dovecot.log <==
Mar 8 20:03:33 spectre dovecot: lmtp(11690): Connect from local
Mar 8 20:03:33 spectre dovecot: lm
Simple LMTP handshake crashes it:
[20:19] root spectre:/usr/lib/dovecot# ./lmtp
220 spectre.leuxner.net Dovecot LMTP ready
Info: Connect from local
lhlo leuxner.net
250-spectre.leuxner.net
250-8BITMIME
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250 PIPELINING
mail from:
250 2.1.0 OK
rcpt to:
250 2.1.5 OK
data
354 OK
Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> Simple LMTP handshake crashes it:
Same here. I'm pretty sure it has been introduced with one of these two
changes:
dovecot (2:2.0.beta3-0~auto+24) unstable; urgency=low
* New revision (10855:681e1c702899) in dovecot Mercurial repository:
- zlib: Several fixes to z
Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> Simple LMTP handshake crashes it:
> Same here. I'm pretty sure it has been introduced with one of these two
> changes:
Affects dovecot-lda as well:
mail.svr02.mucip.net:/var/run/dovecot# sudo -u vmail gdb
/usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.0.1-debian
Copyri
Hi all,
I'm trying to get postfix and dovecot working nicely together to process and
store mail for both local (system) on one domain and virtual users and a few
different domains.
I've got postfix up and running quite nicely, but am having a few problems with
Dovecot. Every time postfix trie
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 22:06 +, Greg Frith wrote:
> gr...@rhy:/etc/dovecot$ sudo dovecot -n
> # 1.1.11: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
> # OS: Linux 2.6.28-18-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 9.04 ext3
If you're using Ubuntu's dovecot-postfix package, it's actually
using /etc/dovecot/dovecot-postfix.conf, not
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 20:15 +, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > Simple LMTP handshake crashes it:
>
> - Simplified up istream-limit implementation.
Yeah, it's this one. I'll probably revert it soon. I did it mostly while
trying to fix istream-zlib bugs, but hopefully zlib won't break when
tha
Edgar Fuß wrote:
What's going on? It's probably some totally stupid typo on my side.
Any comments on this? Anyone with a working date extension?
Most curious. That version should support the date extension as
indicated by the binary containing the corresponding symbols. Did you
set sie
24 matches
Mail list logo
