Hi,
I have a problem with the filename of attachments in some clients.
# dovecot 1.2.(5|7)
* 3 FETCH (BODYSTRUCTURE (("text" "plain" ("charset" "us-ascii") NIL NIL "7bit"
13 1 NIL NIL NIL NIL)("text" "plain" ("charset" "UTF-8" "name"
"ISO-8859-1''testanh%E4ng.txt") NIL NIL "8bit" 27 1 NIL ("att
Le 10 nov. 2009 à 23:44, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 22:56 +0100, Axel Luttgens wrote:
>>> Although fdatasync() seems to have gone missing from .h files, but still
>>> exists in libc. I guess that's intentional?
>>
>> Hello Timo,
>>
>> Did Mike reply about that one?
>
> No.
Hi,
what is the quota plugin for deliver supposed to do when using fs quota?
With IMAP, and not using noenforcing, a user that is over Soft limit can't
copy mails.
With deliver, the mail is delivered normally. When hard limit is exceeded,
there is an error "rejected: Not enough disk space", ju
Hello,
i have mail_debug turned on, and of course i've got a lot more messages in the
log, but nothing which mentions sieve or an error.
Timo:
in the protocol lda section i've got mail_plugins = cmusieve so it should be
active. please see my original message from the 7th of November.
Here is
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 10:16 +0100, myleetl...@gmx.de wrote:
> I think "name" should be "name*" (rfc 2231?)
Yes, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/96b5d6d8dd2c
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
The problem is solved it was as something easy I missed.
Because of the line:
smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
the sasl isn't working on plain logins, so using a telnet session to port
25, doesn't allow you to use the smtp authenticate.
Uncommenting this (or changing yes to no) will make the plain login
On 10-Nov-09, at 9:02 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Laurent Blume wrote:
I would personally find it useful. I use accented and Chinese
characters, and
I, too.
Same here.
I've worked in environments where they were common a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've come across a problem that I can't figure out. I'm using Dovecot
1.2.6 and Sieve 0.1.13.
I'm using the following sieve script to sort my incoming mail.
require ["fileinto", "envelope"];
if envelope :all :is "from" "sopp...@newport.th.gov.b
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 17:49 +0100, Moritz Krinke wrote:
> Timo:
> in the protocol lda section i've got mail_plugins = cmusieve so it should be
> active. please see my original message from the 7th of November.
>
> Here is the complete output in my log concerning dovecot and one message
> which s
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 12:22 +0100, Rainer Frey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the quota plugin for deliver supposed to do when using fs quota?
The same as with IMAP APPEND command (it uses the exact same code).
> So is there any effect of the quota plugin in lda with file system quota?
If you don't s
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 14:29 -0800, Gregory Finch wrote:
> Nov 12 12:26:57 app dovecot: deliver(gfi...@app.ldmltd.ca): sieve:
> msgid=<3708845-2200911412202651...@pelmorex.ca>: failed to store into
> mailbox 'Public/Weather': Permission denied
..
> dovecot-acl for Public/Weather
> authenticated lrs
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 03:26 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
> Nov 12 03:17:00 master: Warning: Killed with signal 15 (by pid=31656 uid=0
> code=kill)
> Nov 12 03:17:00 auth: Error: read(anvil-auth-penalty) failed: EOF
> Nov 12 03:17:00 auth: Error: net_connect_unix(anvil-auth-penalty) failed:
> Connect
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:42 -0800, Jordan Tardif wrote:
Is there a way to disable this feature? Seems to be causing more harm then
good right now. Without getting into too much details it is fixing the
duplcates but it does not remove the old file, and the new file it creates
is not marked as rea
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:04 -0800, Jordan Tardif wrote:
> Heres a litle bit of background on what we are doing and maybe if you have
> time you can let me know what you think the best way of doing this would
> be. When we move users to dovecot servers, we first create a new user on
> the destina
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:04 -0800, Jordan Tardif wrote:
Heres a litle bit of background on what we are doing and maybe if you have
time you can let me know what you think the best way of doing this would
be. When we move users to dovecot servers, we first create a new user on
the destination mach
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:12 -0800, Jordan Tardif wrote:
> Yes that depends on DNS updating. So is there not way to avoid this
> Duplication problem if you need to do an rsync 2x?
Not really. The move should preferably be atomic.. With Dovecot v2.0
there's dsync utility, which would pretty much do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 14:29 -0800, Gregory Finch wrote:
>> Nov 12 12:26:57 app dovecot: deliver(gfi...@app.ldmltd.ca): sieve:
>> msgid=<3708845-2200911412202651...@pelmorex.ca>: failed to store into
>> mailbox 'Public/Weather': P
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:42 -0800, Jordan Tardif wrote:
> Is there a way to disable this feature? Seems to be causing more harm then
> good right now. Without getting into too much details it is fixing the
> duplcates but it does not remove the old file, and the new file it creates
> is not mark
Is there a way to disable this feature? Seems to be causing more harm then
good right now. Without getting into too much details it is fixing the
duplcates but it does not remove the old file, and the new file it creates
is not marked as read like the old one was. I understand that this problem
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:12 -0800, Jordan Tardif wrote:
Yes that depends on DNS updating. So is there not way to avoid this
Duplication problem if you need to do an rsync 2x?
Not really. The move should preferably be atomic.. With Dovecot v2.0
there's
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:22 -0800, Jordan Tardif wrote:
> > I guess the easiest solution would be to:
> >
> > 1) Remove the duplicate detection/fixing code from Dovecot code.
> > 2) Create a script that resolves duplicates by deleting one of them.
>
> So if I do #1 , do you see this causing any ot
I actually meant that you should do both. But no, 1) shouldn't cause
problems.
Or actually looking at the code, it already tries to detect duplicate
hard links and unlinks one of them. You could change the code from:
if (st1.st_ino == st2.st_ino &&
CMP_DEV_T(st1.st_dev, st2.s
22 matches
Mail list logo
