Dear Charles,
try it with pop3 server, it does not work.
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 9/1/2009 7:03 AM, Thomas G. Lau wrote:
We would like to use rawlog to make sure when does user delete email,
can we filter particular command that user sent to dovecot server
instead of log the whole email c
let me provide some more findings:
first, the script which uses >>require "body"<< crashes too for some
mails while running as a script for individual user.
second, we found the test mail example which causes this crash every time.
please let me know if you're interested in the mail source, I
On 9/1/2009, legionaer85 (econd...@googlemail.com) wrote:
> =>dovecot --version
> 1.0.rc15
Wy too old...
Upgrade... 1.2.4 is current stable.
Then come back if you are still having problems...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Please don't top-post in an in-line posted thread...
On 9/2/2009 3:10 AM, Thomas G. Lau wrote:
> We would like to use rawlog to make sure when does user delete email,
> can we filter particular command that user sent to dovecot server
> instead of log the whole email content as well? h
Le 2 sept. 09 à 09:10, Thomas G. Lau a écrit :
Dear Charles,
try it with pop3 server, it does not work.
Hello Thomas,
Don't you see messages like these ones with regular logging:
POP3(someuser): Disconnected: Logged out top=0/0, retr=0/0, del=1/4,
size=615
(by "regular", I mean with Do
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 15:10 +0800, Thomas G. Lau wrote:
> try it with pop3 server, it does not work.
mail_log plugin works with pop3. Do you see anything at all in logs? If
not, try to figure out that first http://wiki.dovecot.org/Logging). If
you do, set mail_debug=yes and show the logs what happ
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 12:19 +0200, Maciej Uhlig wrote:
> 2009-09-01T02:40:57+02:00 prac/prac dovecot: [ID 583609 mail.crit]
> deliver(i...@domain): Panic: file ext-body-common.c: line 149: assertion
> failed: (buf->used - 1 == part->body_size.physical_size)
Can you try if the attached patch fixe
Is anyone running v 1.2.3 and have clients with AVG email scanning?
I upgraded a server a few weeks ago (which ran Dovecot and the Maildir
mail store), and all of a sudden clients with AVG were unable to use
POP. Essentially, AVG freezes. The server upgrade was from FreeBSD 7
to OpenSolari
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 10:33 -0500, Rick Romero wrote:
> Is anyone running v 1.2.3 and have clients with AVG email scanning?
> I upgraded a server a few weeks ago (which ran Dovecot and the Maildir
> mail store), and all of a sudden clients with AVG were unable to use
> POP. Essentially, AVG fre
Am 02.09.2009 um 17:33 schrieb Rick Romero:
Any thoughts? Should I attach compile configs?
If I remember correctly AVG uses a client-side proxy to scan the
mails. This could as well be broken with a recent update...
Thomas
Quoting "Thomas Leuxner" :
Am 02.09.2009 um 17:33 schrieb Rick Romero:
Any thoughts? Should I attach compile configs?
If I remember correctly AVG uses a client-side proxy to scan the
mails. This could as well be broken with a recent update...
That was the original 'solution' and I thou
Am 02.09.2009 um 18:28 schrieb Rick Romero:
I had installed AVG, but haven't had a supported client to properly
test with (AVG hooked into my Bat! install, but it had expired).
Think I had something in the past where it suddenly stopped to work
for encrypted sessions after an AVG update. D
Yep, POP on port 110. If I have them change to port 113 (which
directs to qmail-pop3 on another server) I'm told it works fine.
IMAP works without any issues.
Rick
Quoting "Thomas Leuxner" :
Am 02.09.2009 um 18:28 schrieb Rick Romero:
I had installed AVG, but haven't had a supported clie
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 11:41 -0500, Rick Romero wrote:
> Yep, POP on port 110. If I have them change to port 113 (which
> directs to qmail-pop3 on another server) I'm told it works fine.
What if you make Dovecot listen on non-110 port? Because I'd guess
non-110 port could just bypass AVG's check
Quoting "Timo Sirainen" :
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 11:41 -0500, Rick Romero wrote:
Yep, POP on port 110. If I have them change to port 113 (which
directs to qmail-pop3 on another server) I'm told it works fine.
What if you make Dovecot listen on non-110 port? Because I'd guess
non-110 port coul
I believe that dovecot lmtp server will be released with 2.0 version.
I working at a project that requires an lmtp server to have scalability.
How about the stability of the actual version (alpha, beta ?). Is it
mature to be used at production environment ?
Another question, my 'ideal' setup woul
Hi,
I´m using a multi-storage architecture in my email environment and
maildrop as deliver command at mta. But to this deliver the mx servers
mount nfs partitions - we need to use maildrop because many patches we
inserted.
How can I insert a piece of code at maildrop allowing it to update the
do
Max Ivanov wrote:
I use dovecot 1.2.4 release with sieve 0.1.12
If I setup sieve-before script and latest script contains "keep" at
the very end and no personal scripts found then segfault take place.
here is part of exim log:
2009-09-01 18:43:06 1MiUZA-0005V9-IB ** ivanov_ma...@domain.my
R=lo
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 18:23 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
> How can I insert a piece of code at maildrop allowing it to update the
> dovecot indexes (which lib and/or function from dovecot I need to use ?)
You can't really just update indexes, at least not without a lot of
code. What you cou
Hi,
after reading the wiki about sieve_before/sieve_after and sieve_global_path,
it's still unclear to me if:
sieve_before scripts are executed if no user script exists, but a global
script is defined.
The reason I ask, is because I'd like to use the same script, so that I don't
have to mainta
Very interesting...I don´t like the idea maildrop calling dovecot deliver
(as an external program).
But I like the idea maildrop calling the dovecot api to save the message
into the maildir.
And yes, my patches don´t touch the maildir delivery. So, I can just
change the maildrop 'deliver' functio
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 19:12 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
> But I like the idea maildrop calling the dovecot api to save the message
> into the maildir.
>
> And yes, my patches don´t touch the maildir delivery. So, I can just
> change the maildrop 'deliver' function and call the dovecot one.
Mel Flynn schreef:
Hi,
after reading the wiki about sieve_before/sieve_after and sieve_global_path,
it's still unclear to me if:
sieve_before scripts are executed if no user script exists, but a global
script is defined.
At least one (the first) sieve_before script is always executed,
irrespe
On Thursday 03 September 2009 01:13:49 Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Mel Flynn schreef:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after reading the wiki about sieve_before/sieve_after and
> > sieve_global_path, it's still unclear to me if:
> > sieve_before scripts are executed if no user script exists, but a global
> > script is d
Can I just "replace" the function called to save the message in the
maildir (and update the indexes) by the dovecot one? Do I need to copy the
code to load configuration when using only the api functions ?
P.s: how about v2.0 - what is the stage? Is there any date to be released ?
Thanks,
Fernand
On Sep 2, 2009, at 5:17 PM, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
I believe that dovecot lmtp server will be released with 2.0 version.
I working at a project that requires an lmtp server to have
scalability.
How about the stability of the actual version (alpha, beta ?). Is it
mature to be used at pr
On Sep 2, 2009, at 9:28 PM, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
Can I just "replace" the function called to save the message in the
maildir (and update the indexes) by the dovecot one?
I don't know about maildrop code, but "maybe". But Dovecot doesn't
just have a "save message" function. You need t
On Sep 2, 2009, at 5:17 PM, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
I believe that dovecot lmtp server will be released with 2.0 version.
I working at a project that requires an lmtp server to have
scalability.
How about the stability of the actual version (alpha, beta ?). Is it
mature to be used at pr
28 matches
Mail list logo