Dear Pascal,
rawlog does not include timestamp on the log, how is it possible to be
done, also, is it possible to combine in, out log into one? so that we
could see the whole picture
Pascal Volk wrote:
On 08/25/2009 06:57 AM Thomas G. Lau wrote:
Dear all,
does anyone did any scripting t
Thomas G. Lau wrote:
> Dear Pascal,
>
> rawlog does not include timestamp on the log, how is it possible to be
> done, also, is it possible to combine in, out log into one? so that we
> could see the whole picture
>
Syslog.
~Seth
Dear Seth,
any docs shows how to pipe rawlog into syslog ?
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Thomas G. Lau wrote:
Dear Pascal,
rawlog does not include timestamp on the log, how is it possible to be
done, also, is it possible to combine in, out log into one? so that we
could see the whole picture
> Do you have any other userdbs now? What does dovecot-ldap-userdb.conf
> now contain? Is it only quota that's now broken or the logins
> completely?
The dovecot-ldap-userdb.conf is only a symbolic link on the original
dovecot-ldap.conf.
Only the ldap-quota is broken. The normal ldap-authentific
Hi there!
I have two DNS records
mail1.domain.tld
mail2.domain.tld
I have issued SSL server Certificates for both my domain names.
Is it possible to tell dovecot to use both , depending on
client access;
clients using the mail1.domain.tld be served by the mail1.domain.tld
.key and .cert
and t
El Mon, 24-08-2009 a las 18:27 +0200, Stefano Fedrigo escribió:
> > I guess I could work around it, but then again no one else has had this
> > problem.. It'll be fixed in v2.0 in any case.
>
> Of course the main problem is with Openldap, but such a fix could be very
> useful to improve system's r
Hi! Sorry by my english. Set Postfix + dovecot + AD + ldap, everything works
well, but appears in the logs, every 15 minutes:
auth(default): Error: LDAP: Connection lost to LDAP server, reconnecting
Standart limit ldap connect to AD 15 minutes.
Can somehow fix this problem without increasing the
mail_log plugin, not rawlog.
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 15:37 +0800, Thomas G. Lau wrote:
> Dear Pascal,
>
> rawlog does not include timestamp on the log, how is it possible to be
> done, also, is it possible to combine in, out log into one? so that we
> could see the whole picture
>
> Pascal Volk
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 04:08 -0700, south africa wrote:
> Aug 25 11:51:18 auth(default): Info: client in: AUTH1 PLAIN
> service=pop3secured lip=123.456.789.72 rip=192.168.1.2
> lport=995 rport=1984
> Aug 25 11:51:18 auth(default): Info: client out: CONT 1
> Aug 25 1
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 00:29 -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On upgrading to Dovecot 1.2.3, the "cmusieve" plugin was replaced by
> "sieve", so I started getting these errors in my maillog until I fixed
> the configuration:
>
> Aug 19 11:33:26 trinity dovecot: deliver(bernie): Fatal: Plugin cmus
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 16:09 +0400, McShel wrote:
> Hi! Sorry by my english. Set Postfix + dovecot + AD + ldap, everything works
> well, but appears in the logs, every 15 minutes:
>
> auth(default): Error: LDAP: Connection lost to LDAP server, reconnecting
>
> Standart limit ldap connect to AD 15
Hi,
I want to pick up this discussion.
I am trying to achieve the same, but I am using Maildir instead.
Here's the (relevent part of the) config file as configured by the recent
suggestion:
# We're using Maildir format
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir
# Authentication configuration:
auth_verbo
Hi,
I´m reading the past topics related to archive and scalability of dovecot,
they are all very interesting. Here, I´m using two dovecot proxies in
front of five storages pairs, and we split the domain´s accounts among
those servers. So, we can share the i/o load and if one server goes down
only
25.08.09, 17:32, "Timo Sirainen" :
> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 16:09 +0400, McShel wrote:
> > Hi! Sorry by my english. Set Postfix + dovecot + AD + ldap, everything
> > works well, but appears in the logs, every 15 minutes:
> >
> > auth(default): Error: LDAP: Connection lost to LDAP server, reconnec
On 8/25/2009, McShel (mcs...@yandex.ua) wrote:
> Thank you! You include this fix in the next release?
He always does... :)
--
Best regards,
Charles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Working and now on an HA cluster.
Thanks Timo.
A
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 17:36 +0100, S. A. Woltering wrote:
>> # /opt/dovecot/sbin/dovecot
>> Info: If you have trouble with authentication failures,
>> enable auth_debug setting. S
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:00 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
> this is very weird and (at same time) very interesting approach. Instead
> of put all messages into one maildir and this maildir into one server,
> this "maildir" (?) is spplited among many servers - so, if one servers
> fails the ac
Hi Timo,
Yes it´s related, but I don´t understand '... You'll just need to
implement a filesystem that allows distributing a single user's mails to
multiple servers ...'.
My idea is just in the direction that we don´t need to care about
filesystem, we don´t need any distribuited filesystem...let
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 12:12 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> Yes it´s related, but I don´t understand '... You'll just need to
> implement a filesystem that allows distributing a single user's mails to
> multiple servers ...'.
>
> My idea is just in the direction that we don´t n
I´m not sure if i´m being quite clear about my solution (pardon my
english)...
I´m not thinking in any filesystem abstraction layer, I´m afraid of this
kind of solution. If some corruption happens we can loose data - and the
crash-recovery is not easy.
I´m suggesting the opposite, to not have an
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 12:41 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
> I´m suggesting the opposite, to not have an abstraction layer. The
> abstraction layer would be the proxy - dovecot does the abstraction layer.
> When I´m telling 'proxy' I meaning something like the proxy feature of the
> dovecot.
ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
I´m reading the past topics related to archive and scalability of dovecot,
they are all very interesting. Here, I´m using two dovecot proxies in
front of five storages pairs, and we split the domain´s accounts among
those servers. So, we can share the i/o load and if
That is an ssl imposibility, and the current tls clients can't really
do that either. The best way to do it is to use seperate ip's for
mail1 and mail2.
The only other option is to use a new certificate with
subject-alt-names, but lots of email clients don't support that.
Webbrowsers have
Hi Timo,
Do you have any experience using Dovecot and Glusterfs ? How about the
maturity of Glusterfs in a huge email environment ?
Fernando
> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 12:12 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
>> Hi Timo,
>>
>> Yes it´s related, but I don´t understand '... You'll just need to
>>
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 14:13 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> Do you have any experience using Dovecot and Glusterfs ?
Not really.
> How about the
> maturity of Glusterfs in a huge email environment ?
No idea.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message pa
Hi i have:
[r...@mail log]# rpm -q dovecot
dovecot-1.2.4-0_99.el5
and have the same problem with ldap (AD), in this release is not include the
patch? (http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/355d5a40f7a7)
is normal the reconnection to ldap server? or exist any reazon for lose the
connection?
Aug 2
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 12:37 -0500, Andrés A. Gómez Palacio wrote:
> Hi i have:
>
> [r...@mail log]# rpm -q dovecot
> dovecot-1.2.4-0_99.el5
>
> and have the same problem with ldap (AD), in this release is not include the
> patch? (http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/355d5a40f7a7)
v1.2.4 was re
Quoting Romer Ventura :
Last time i checked the free version of DRBD only supports 2 nodes.
Correct. But RHCS supports more, and works best with an off number
(to prevent cluster splits, etc).
The paid version supports 16 nodes.
I think there are some limits on that too... Like two read-
Patrick Domack wrote:
That is an ssl imposibility, and the current tls clients can't really
do that either. The best way to do it is to use seperate ip's for
mail1 and mail2.
The only other option is to use a new certificate with
subject-alt-names, but lots of email clients don't support that
I have set up postifx and dovecot (1.1) with virtual users and delivery via
LDA. I am very pleased with the results so far but have this problem with
quotas.
Setting a global quota using plugin { } I initially used maildir to set quotas,
but they seem to apply to all folders apart from INBOX.
We are occasionally experiencing trouble where the NFS server's load
will shoot over 60+. (Normal of sub 1.0).
I have been hunting this for a while, and I believe it comes down to
"deliver".
System setup:
NFS servers: x4540 Solaris 10 x64 ZFS over NFS.
NFS clients: Solaris 10 x64 postfix-2
On Aug 25, 2009, at 10:06 PM, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
26099: stat64("/export/censored/mail/cur/
1223013930.V4700010I69f93eM483098.vmx02.unix:2,S", 0x08047930) = 0
Are these old files, or why don't they contain the ,S=1234 in
filename? That would help a lot when recaculating Maildir++ quota.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Are these old files, or why don't they contain the ,S=1234 in filename?
That would help a lot when recaculating Maildir++ quota.
Ah legacy reasons :) We used to use UFS (with quotas) inside zvol on the
zfs server. But this panics, and has performance issues.
We changed
On Aug 25, 2009, at 11:39 PM, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
Do you need Maildir++ quota at all? With v1.2 you could use dict
quota with file backend. It'll use dovecot.index.cache when
recalculating quota, although it doesn't do that unless the quota
is lost for some reason (so about never).
We o
On Aug 25, 2009, at 7:41 PM, Random Monkey wrote:
I have set up postifx and dovecot (1.1) with virtual users and
delivery via LDA. I am very pleased with the results so far but have
this problem with quotas.
Setting a global quota using plugin { } I initially used maildir to
set quotas, b
Yeah, zfs quotas gets rid of this problem. Maybe I should also start
recommending people to use dict quota with v1.2.. Hmm. Although I think
there was also some rare issue with it that I should fix.
Ah great. I was just about to move the customer's directory to the test
servers and try with,
36 matches
Mail list logo
