Re: [Dovecot] Separate quotas not displayed correctly

2008-11-03 Thread Laurent Blume
Timo Sirainen a écrit : > First of all see if the problem is with Thunderbird or Dovecot. Ask the > quota values directly from Dovecot: > > telnet localhost 143 > a login user pass > b getquotaroot inbox > c getquotaroot some-other-box > > If b/c didn't return correct values, try also: > > d get

Re: [Dovecot] Separate quotas not displayed correctly

2008-11-03 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 10:21 +0100, Laurent Blume wrote: > 2 getquotaroot inbox > * QUOTAROOT "inbox" "INBOX" "Others" > * QUOTA "INBOX" (STORAGE 0 2) > * QUOTA "Others" (STORAGE 6490 1) > 2 OK Getquotaroot completed. .. > From what I read in the RFC, it seems to be a bug in Dovecot, it shou

Re: [Dovecot] How do I use plus-addressing in Dovecot 1.1.x?

2008-11-03 Thread Charles Marcus
On 11/2/2008 3:33 PM, Jon Fullmer wrote: > How must I change my Dovecot 1.1.x configuration so that my "plus > addressing" set up (detailed above) will work again? So, maybe it would be a good idea to actually provide some config details? ;) output of dovecot -n would a goo starting place... --

Re: [Dovecot] v1.1.6 released

2008-11-03 Thread Cor Bosman
Has there been some issue fixed between 1.1.5 and 1.1.6 that could explain a huge drop in CPU use? I was having problems with a 1.1.5 box that kept being on about 80% CPU (a dual quad core box). I updated it to 1.1.6, and ever since it's been at < 5% CPU. (no change in number of users). Cor

Re: [Dovecot] v1.1.6 released

2008-11-03 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Nov 3, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Cor Bosman wrote: Has there been some issue fixed between 1.1.5 and 1.1.6 that could explain a huge drop in CPU use? I was having problems with a 1.1.5 box that kept being on about 80% CPU (a dual quad core box). I updated it to 1.1.6, and ever since it's been at <

Re: [Dovecot] Separate quotas not displayed correctly

2008-11-03 Thread Laurent Blume
Timo Sirainen a écrit : > I guess it's more like a non-implemented feature. I'll add to my TODO. Any ETA for it? Even a rough guesstimate. It's part of our requirements for deployment of a new version, just need to reschedule it differently if it's going to be available only a la later date Thank

Re: [Dovecot] patch: list shared namespace

2008-11-03 Thread Bernhard Herzog
On 01.11.2008, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:51 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > LIST % -> List "foo" as non-existing > > LIST foo -> List "foo" as non-existing > > LIST * -> List "foo/bar" only > > There are also some truly horrible cases. I tested this with my acl_mailbox_list_i

Re: [Dovecot] How do I use plus-addressing in Dovecot 1.1.x?

2008-11-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you post your conf files ? I could try it on one of my setups. I have no idea how to make + addressing tho >.< Jon Fullmer wrote: > I'm using Postfix, Amavisd-new/SpamAssassin, and Dovecot. They all run > on the same server (running Linux). The mailboxes are stored on the > same server in mail

Re: [Dovecot] How do I use plus-addressing in Dovecot 1.1.x?

2008-11-03 Thread Jon Fullmer
I didn't want to inundate the list with too much data. Here's the output of "dovecot -n". Because I'm paranoid, some parts are obfuscated with capital Xs: # 1.1.6: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.27.4 ppc ext3 protocols: imaps ssl_cert_file: XX ssl_key_file: XXX