On 13.11.2007 4:22, Jonathan Bond-Caron wrote:
Anyone have any solution to this?
I also getting a "The target principal name is incorrect." in Outlook 2007
Is this a problem with dovecot?
That's probably because you CN doesn't match your server in certificate.
Do you using self-si
Hi list,
Here is thing im trying to accomplish. I would like to setup public folders
which resposible for delivering mails for some speical addresses like [EMAIL
PROTECTED] And it will be perfect if "seen" status for this folder will be
saved per user. I mean if one user read message and set it
Any way to minimize the number of sql statements that dovecot do?
(and I tried adding userdb prefetch { } but number of sql calls are still the
same)
Am I doing something wrong or?
Regards,
BTJ
--
> "BH" == Benjamin R Haskell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BH> Since you're not doing anything protocol-specific (like echo "* OK
BH> [ALERT] Blah"), you could use the symlink trick to only require
BH> one script:
BH> ln -s /path/script /path/imap
BH> ln -s /path/script /pat
> "M" == Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
M> What if the script only touched the dovecot.index if it exists?
M> That would likely not be too difficult to test for with shell
M> script.
Might be tricky to do in shell without a race. On the other hand maybe a
race in this case is
On 13.11.2007, at 13.21, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
Any way to minimize the number of sql statements that dovecot do?
(and I tried adding userdb prefetch { } but number of sql calls are
still the same)
Did you add the userdb_* fields to passdb? Did you put prefetch
before userdb sql? Show do
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:17:48 +0200
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13.11.2007, at 13.21, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
>
> > Any way to minimize the number of sql statements that dovecot do?
> >
> > (and I tried adding userdb prefetch { } but number of sql calls are
> > still the same)
Hoi,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:08:46PM +0300, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> My question is can I do such setup with dovecot+postfix. Im really appreciate
> for simple examples how can i accomplish this kind setup if it possible :)
AFAIK the "Seen" Flag is not maintained on a per user basis.
I do the
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:03:37PM +0100, Markus Stumpf wrote:
Hoi,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:08:46PM +0300, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> My question is can I do such setup with dovecot+postfix. Im really
appreciate for simple examples how can i accomplish this kind setup if it
possible :)
13.11.2007 19:30, Adam McDougall пишет:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:03:37PM +0100, Markus Stumpf wrote:
Hoi,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:08:46PM +0300, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> My question is can I do such setup with dovecot+postfix. Im really
appreciate for simple examples how can i a
Nikolay Shopik wrote:
On 13.11.2007 4:22, Jonathan Bond-Caron wrote:
Anyone have any solution to this?
I also getting a "The target principal name is incorrect." in Outlook
2007
Is this a problem with dovecot?
That's probably because you CN doesn't match your server in
certifica
On 13.11.2007 22:32, Ed W wrote:
Nikolay Shopik wrote:
On 13.11.2007 4:22, Jonathan Bond-Caron wrote:
Anyone have any solution to this?
I also getting a "The target principal name is incorrect." in
Outlook 2007
Is this a problem with dovecot?
That's probably because you CN doe
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> I'm wondering how one would set up auth for this? Asterisk needs to
> log in to the account to deliver the voicemail and to check its state,
> but I wouldn't want to put everyone's mail password in plaintext in
> Asterisk's voicemail.conf file.
Not sure, but have you tried t
--On Monday, November 12, 2007 6:49 PM -0500 Andrew Girling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One possible solution is that you grant Asterisk access to the mailboxes
with as a master user with a (strong) master password. See the wiki
for more information:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/M
The recent addition of auth_gssapi_hostname is a welcome addition, but a little
more is needed
for multi-homed (or multi-domained) sites.
SSH recently added this enhancement to address this common need:
GSSAPIStrictAcceptorCheck
Determines whether to be strict about the ident
Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> Usually it works like this. You are configure your mail client to
> address like this mail.example.com, when mail client establish
> connection to server and receive certificate it compare CN with current
> configuration in it. So if you configure connect to mx.example.com b
Eli Sand wrote:
Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Usually it works like this. You are configure your mail client to
address like this mail.example.com, when mail client establish
connection to server and receive certificate it compare CN with current
configuration in it. So if you configure connect to mx
Hugo Monteiro wrote:
> Ah ... wildcard certs .. from what i recall, certs issued like
> *.example.com were not very well accepted by M$ clients. You should
> test against non wildcard certs and see how it behaves.
Already have and no luck :( My domain is elisand.com and I have tried
*.elisand.com
Eli Sand wrote:
Hugo Monteiro wrote:
Ah ... wildcard certs .. from what i recall, certs issued like
*.example.com were not very well accepted by M$ clients. You should
test against non wildcard certs and see how it behaves.
Already have and no luck :( My domain is elisand.com and I ha
Agree with Hugo most root CA have intermidate certificates which should
supplied with your server certificate. Otherwise chain won't work and any
client don't trust it.
- original message -
Subject:Re: [Dovecot] SSL/TLS with Outlook client
From: Hugo Monteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
20 matches
Mail list logo
