On 3.11.2007, at 7.54, Abhijit Hoskeri wrote:
There is a small typo in src/lib/network.c line 624
return "A non-recovable name server error occurred";
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/90b7671c8f2e
Sorry about the pedantry. BTW, I am getting this error whenever I am
trying to r
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 12:15:31PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The problem is most likely that login process is running chrooted.
> login_chroot=no would help.
It does - thanks a lot, I had been struggling for hours!
> Another way would be to do this in dovecot-auth, but if it's done
> th
After updating Dovecot, one of my servers keep spamming these errors in
the log:
dovecot: Nov 03 14:14:18 Error: POP3([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Getting size of
message UID=4402 failed
dovecot: Nov 03 14:14:18 Error: POP3([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Getting size of
message UID=4402 failed
dovecot: Nov 03 14:
Hi
After upgrading to dovecot 1.0.7 I noticed that the actual username is
no longer logged, but rather the system user (in my case 'vmail')
under which my virtual set-up runs. Now I'm unable to see which
virtual users log in. Any pointers on how to configure dovecot to log
the actual username give
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 18:14 +0200, dale gallagher wrote:
> After upgrading to dovecot 1.0.7 I noticed that the actual username is
> no longer logged, but rather the system user (in my case 'vmail')
> under which my virtual set-up runs.
Upgrading from what version? I don't think I've changed anythi
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 14:20 +0100, Tom Sommer wrote:
> After updating Dovecot,
From what version?
> one of my servers keep spamming these errors in
> the log:
>
> dovecot: Nov 03 14:14:18 Error: POP3([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Getting size of
> message UID=4402 failed
> dovecot: Nov 03 14:14:18 Erro
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 17:25 +0530, Abhijit Hoskeri wrote:
> > Another way would be to do this in dovecot-auth, but if it's done
> > there it should be done asynchronously (or in auth worker processes)
> > and doing async dns lookups would require some async dns library..
>
> Now, I think I unde
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 20:42 +0100, Paolo wrote:
> indeed, I spent a while to convince the autoconf to look that up, but then I
> realized the problem isn't the path, the test program always fails, simply
> because the new defs have been splitted in the 2 files mentioned in the wiki,
> the problem
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:23:57PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > instead are defined in the single linux/inotify.h.
>
> If you do like the wiki says, you should have only a single inotify.h
> file containing also inotify-syscall.h's contents.
>
ahh - now I see it - too small a screen, didn't n
