Mike Brudenell wrote:
> Yes... However the dovecot.conf configuration file includes a comment
> which says this:
>
> # Should all IMAP and POP3 processes be killed when Dovecot master process
> # shuts down. Setting this to "no" means that Dovecot can be upgraded
> without
> # forcing existing c
Hi, Jerry/et al -
On 4 Oct 2007, at 20:47, Jerry Yeager wrote:
Have you considered sending out a message to each user to the
effect that on some day, darned-early a.m. the system will be
offline for 30 minutes for maintenance (no incoming email will be
lost, etc., etc.).
We have around
I have just installed dovecot and want to set up the drac interface. However,
when I compile drac.c I get the following link errors; anybody know what the
right compile options are for a 64 bit system? I have a Gentoo Linux system
using the amd64 architecture.
gcc -Wall -W -shared -fPIC -DHAVE
On 2007-10-05 17:48:51 +0700, Robin Atwood wrote:
> I have just installed dovecot and want to set up the drac interface. However,
> when I compile drac.c I get the following link errors; anybody know what the
> right compile options are for a 64 bit system? I have a Gentoo Linux system
> using t
On Friday 05 Oct 2007, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> On 2007-10-05 17:48:51 +0700, Robin Atwood wrote:
> your libdrac is compiled without -fPIC -pic
Thanks, that did the trick!
-Robin.
--
--
Robin Atwood.
"Ship me somewheres east of
Daniel Watts wrote:
Dear List,
Am accessing dovecot imap through squirrelmail.
Squirrelmail paginates the message list into pages.
All works fine except for the page one particular email is in. When I
try to open that page (or in fact click 'show all') the server returns:
ERROR: Bad or malfo
It *is* neater to kill off the older version processes though. Most of
our clients (Outlook Express and Prayer Webmail) will
reconnect automatically anyway.
Agreed. I haven't come across any clients that puke when you abruptly
cut off their connection. All the common ones I tried seem t
Is Thunderbird supposed to show alerts sent via post-login scripts as in the
wiki example?
dovecot-imapd 1.0.5-1 (Debian)
Thunderbird (Icedove) 2.0.0.4 (Debian)
# dovecot -n|grep 'mail_executable(imap)'
mail_executable(imap): /usr/local/sbin/dovecot-alert.sh
# cat /usr/local/sbin/dovecot-alert.s
Greetings -
Now that users are beginning to pile up more on our new Dovecot-based
IMAP service I'm seeing a small number of entries like this in the
logfiles:
Corrupted index cache file /mailstore/index/o/ozw100/.INBOX/
dovecot.index.cache
: invalid record size
We are using Dovecot 1.0.3
Mike Brudenell wrote:
> Greetings -
>
> Now that users are beginning to pile up more on our new Dovecot-based
> IMAP service I'm seeing a small number of entries like this in the
> logfiles:
>
> Corrupted index cache file
> /mailstore/index/o/ozw100/.INBOX/dovecot.index.cache
> : invalid record
On Oct 5, 2007, at 12:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 10:25:49 +0100
From: Mike Brudenell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] How to upgrade a running Dovecot?
To: Dovecot Mailing Li
Hello,
Recently we have been asked to deploy some shared imap folders within our
instance of dovecot. However, we ran into a problem with how ACLs are
implemented, and consequences regarding maildir++ mailboxes.
Long story short:
* IMAP clients sees the hierarchy as a tree: sample/1, where 1 i
Hi guys i understand that you can't subscribe to the Prefix names of
namespace folders right now with dovecot.
But for instance if i user outlook express and it can't see the prefix
name then it can't see the subfolders of that "prefix folder" either.
So even though it can detect and see the subf
James wrote:
Hi guys i understand that you can't subscribe to the Prefix names of
namespace folders right now with dovecot.
But for instance if i user outlook express and it can't see the prefix
name then it can't see the subfolders of that "prefix folder" either.
So even though it can detect an
Hello
I'm currently trying to use Active Directory with Unix extensions to
store UID, GID and homedir and retrieve them with ldap
I don't want to allow anonymous bindings and I would rather not use
TLS and manage a PKI.
So I'm trying to use SASL to do a Kerberos authentication for Dovecot
against
Hi,
I'm using dovecot 1.0.5 with mbox storage. Users can't delete folders
that are created to 'only hold other folders'. I can create these
folders with no problem. They are directories in the file system. Normal
folders (which are mbox files) are deleted with no problem. I've tried
with both
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 13:50 -0700, Adam Tilghman wrote:
> Is it possible to subscribe to the "root" of this new Maildir heirarchy as
> if it were just another folder? If not, would this be a useful feature to
> add?
It was in my TODO for a while, but no-one has yet told me why they
need/want th
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
> So, what would
> have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the
> phone think all of the messages are older than 30 days?
Is it using SORT command? Apparently there are some bugs still in it.
http://dovecot.org/bugrep
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 17:46 +0200, Jon Blazquez wrote:
> Hello,
> We are running Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 4)
> with OCFS2 for our mail servers. There are three nodes in the cluster
> with shared storage and OCFS2 filesystem on it. The filesystem
> is used for mail stor
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 11:32 +0800, Tan Shao Yi wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> We are observing some weird behaviour when we try to rename an inferior
> folder, followed by the superior folder.
>
> These folders have an asterisk in the name.
Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/880d21a2a6
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 00:41 +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a strange issue here. I have a large message of a svn commit and the
> message is cloning itself more and more. I've deleted it several time
> completely but it doesn't go away.
Find the duplicated message files in maild
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 16:09 -0500, Andrew Garner wrote:
> The following error occurred after a "SORT (TO) US-ASCII ALL" command.
> This only seems to happen with "to", all our other tests work as
> expected.
>
> Oct 1 20:32:49 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> pool_data_stack_realloc(): stack
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 11:00 -0700, Knute Johnson wrote:
> Is it possible to use saslauth for digest-md5 or cram-md5
> authentication? If so how would one go about configuring dovecot?
What's "saslauth"? If you mean Cyrus saslauthd or something like that,
then no.
signature.asc
Description: Thi
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
So, what would
have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the
phone think all of the messages are older than 30 days?
Is it using SORT command? Apparently there are some bugs still in it.
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 13:10 -0400, Madison Kelly wrote:
>My question is, can I have Postfix/Dovecot use a custom password
> hashing system?
http://dovecot.org/patches/password-scheme-lmpass.c is an example
plugin. It's been written a long time ago, so I'm not sure if it still
works with v1.0.
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 11:51 -0400, Cory Coager wrote:
> The current command did not succeed. The mail server responded: Mailbox
> doesn't exist:
> .EPUNGED.Trash
>
> I copied the config exactly as its written on:
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Lazyexpunge
I guess your main namespace uses '.'
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 14:24 +0200, Lars Stavholm wrote:
> In my development environment I sometimes get:
>
> dovecot: IMAP(stava): Timeout leak: 0x4425d0
>
> Does anyone know what it means or how I can use this information?
It means timeout_add() was called, but the returned struct wasn't passed
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 17:27 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
> >
> >> So, what would
> >> have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the
> >> phone think all of the messages are older than 30 day
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 16:51 -0500, Ken A wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using dovecot 1.0.5 with mbox storage. Users can't delete folders
> that are created to 'only hold other folders'. I can create these
> folders with no problem. They are directories in the file system. Normal
> folders (which are mbo
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 17:40 +0100, Mike Brudenell wrote:
> Corrupted index cache file /mailstore/index/o/ozw100/.INBOX/
> dovecot.index.cache
> : invalid record size
All cache file errors are completely transparent to clients. The cache
file gets deleted and Dovecot creates the wanted data from s
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 13:57 +0100, Mike Brudenell wrote:
> Scenario 1: Change to dovecot.conf
> ===
> If I make a change to dovecot.conf am I right in thinking I can
> simply send a HUP signal to the main dovecot process to get it to re-
> read the configuration
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 15:29 +0100, Daniel Watts wrote:
> > ERROR: Bad or malformed request.
> > Query: FETCH 549,551,555:557,563,565,567:569 (FLAGS UID RFC822.SIZE
> > INTERNALDATE BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (Date To Cc From Subject X-Priority
> > Importance Priority Content-Type)])
> > Server respo
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 20:03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi folks. Quick question in the hopes that someone knows the answer, before
> I dig in the code some more.
>
> In testing a new setup with some long-term archival mbox-format mailboxes
> stored on an NFS mount, we've found the followi
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 15:38 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> One of our users seems to have strange problems with his mailbox:
>
> Oct 2 00:36:42 postamt dovecot: IMAP(rb): Corrupted transaction log file
> /home/r/b/rb/Maildir/.listen.CCL/dovecot.index.log: Append with UID 1096,
> but n
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 16:51 -0500, Ken A wrote:
Hi,
I'm using dovecot 1.0.5 with mbox storage. Users can't delete folders
that are created to 'only hold other folders'. I can create these
folders with no problem. They are directories in the file system. Normal
folders (w
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 17:27 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
So, what would
have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the
phone think all of the messages are ol
36 matches
Mail list logo
