Hello,
I have read in lots of places about how I should use
pop3_reuse_xuidl = yes
to prevent pop3 users having to re-download mail (and duplicate their
e-mail) after a migration.
This fails with the message:
pop3_uidl_format setting is missing from config file
Which setting for pop3_uidl_format
I want to discuss some problems/enhancements for dovecot in a webmail/otp setup.
For access to an IMAP server like dovecot I see different client types:
a) a "normal" MUA installed in a more or less trusted environment
b) remote access via "webmail" from untrusted environments
For a) I see with d
hi,
it'd be very useful to include the quota warning patch in official
release. without it the quota support is not really useful since mail
simple dropped when quota is over. and most enduser never know what
happend, they just recognize mails are not coming:-(
thanks.
--
Levente
Hello, I am new to this list, and I wanted to bring up an issue
that I have been struggling with. ( Now that I have subscribed to
the correct list!)
I want to enable SSL for our mail server that runs Dovecot and
Exim. I have been told that if SSL is enabled then it can break
Eudora ma
On 7/23/2007, Frank Behrens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I want to discuss some problems/enhancements for dovecot in a
webmail/otp setup.
For access to an IMAP server like dovecot I see different client
types:
a) a "normal" MUA installed in a more or less trusted environment
b) remote access vi
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 7/23/2007, Frank Behrens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I want to discuss some problems/enhancements for dovecot in a
webmail/otp setup.
For access to an IMAP server like dovecot I see different client types:
a) a "normal" MUA installed in a more or less trusted environmen
On Monday 23 July 2007 01:13:37 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 00:52 -0400, Jim Horner wrote:
> > Does the keyword/action discard work by default or is there something I
> > have to do in the configuration to get to work...
>
> Sorry, looks like I broke this for Dovecot v1.0.2. Could
Phillip T. George, on 7/23/2007 1:00 PM, said the following:
SSL/TLS is not going to solve the keylogger and malware problem.
Basically, if you're on a public (or even a friend's) computer and
someone decides to monitor keystrokes using some application, your
password will be completely compro
Charles Marcus wrote:
Phillip T. George, on 7/23/2007 1:00 PM, said the following:
SSL/TLS is not going to solve the keylogger and malware problem.
Basically, if you're on a public (or even a friend's) computer and
someone decides to monitor keystrokes using some application, your
password wi
Phillip T. George, on 7/23/2007 1:30 PM, said the following:
Charles Marcus wrote:
Phillip T. George, on 7/23/2007 1:00 PM, said the following:
SSL/TLS is not going to solve the keylogger and malware problem.
Basically, if you're on a public (or even a friend's) computer and
someone decides t
Charles Marcus wrote:
Phillip T. George, on 7/23/2007 1:30 PM, said the following:
Charles Marcus wrote:
Phillip T. George, on 7/23/2007 1:00 PM, said the following:
SSL/TLS is not going to solve the keylogger and malware problem.
Basically, if you're on a public (or even a friend's) computer
Phillip T. George wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
Phillip T. George, on 7/23/2007 1:30 PM, said the following:
Charles Marcus wrote:
Phillip T. George, on 7/23/2007 1:00 PM, said the following:
SSL/TLS is not going to solve the keylogger and malware problem.
Basically, if you're on a public (
On Mon, July 23, 2007 10:54 am, Phillip T. George wrote:
[...]
> Oh...also his post did include "/OTP", which unless I'm mistaken, than means
Off-Topic Post ..so it doesn't really matter if it had to do with Dovecot or
not, right? :)
:-)
I believe he was referring to One Time Passwords.
--Jo
On 7/23/07, Phillip T. George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Oh...also his post did include "/OTP", which unless I'm mistaken, than
means Off-Topic Post ..so it doesn't really matter if it had to do with
Dovecot or not, right? :)
I took it to mean one time password once i saw the context, O
Joakim Ryden wrote:
On Mon, July 23, 2007 10:54 am, Phillip T. George wrote:
[...]
Oh...also his post did include "/OTP", which unless I'm mistaken, than means
Off-Topic Post ..so it doesn't really matter if it had to do with Dovecot or
not, right? :)
:-)
I believe he was referring to
Charles Marcus wrote on 23 Jul 2007 13:21:
> Phillip T. George, on 7/23/2007 1:00 PM, said the following:
> > SSL/TLS is not going to solve the keylogger and malware problem.
> > Basically, if you're on a public (or even a friend's) computer and
> > someone decides to monitor keystrokes using
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 17:15 +0200, Frank Behrens wrote:
> Solution 1:
> When PAM is configured for IMAP the user can use a one-time-password in the
> same way
> as before. The problem is, that the user must know the sequence number for
> the password
> (otp challenge), so we need a way to displ
17 matches
Mail list logo
