Well I don't know what it was, but something you said encouraged me to
give up on my current version of Procmail and move to the current
version of procmail. It turns out that its the package of procmail that
came with Slamd 10.2 which was version 3.15.2 causing all of this mess.
I DLed the l
Hi Timo, et al -
On 17 Jul 2007, at 18:12, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 17.7.2007, at 13.55, Mike Brudenell wrote:
auto_direct /mailstore/messages/p autofs
direct,ignore,dev=4740014 1184648400
crypt2.york.ac.uk:/vol/vol9/p /mailstore/messages/p nfs
proto=tcp,xattr,dev=47003
Ah! After a bit of test programming I understand what's going on now.
If I'm right then there are a few incorrect assumptions in Dovecot's
logic. (Sorry! :-)
On 17 Jul 2007, at 18:12, Timo Sirainen wrote:
auto_direct /mailstore/messages/p autofs
direct,ignore,dev=4740014 11
Hi,
I wish to setup a shared folder where everyone can read and copy. How
does that work? Does each user get their own index file to determine
weather a mail i read or not? can users move or copy mail?
Thanks in advance
Best regards - Jon
So far so good...other than a my-bad fubar with the permission on the
index directory that kept DC from creating index dirs for the
entering-for-the-first-time users, quickly noticed (thanks to the
excellent logging) and corrected.
Some questions
1) the max_mail_processes parm in dovecot.conf.
On Tuesday, July 17 at 03:45 PM, quoth John Peacock:
This:
$ ls -f ./tmp ./cur | xargs rm
is really quite efficient, and doesn't fall prey to commandline globbing
limits...
Another one I use often is:
find ./tmp ./cur -type f -exec rm {} \;
~Kyle
--
The real problem is not whet
Hi Jon,
Wednesday, July 18, 2007, 3:30:17 PM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> I wish to setup a shared folder where everyone can read and copy. How
> does that work? Does each user get their own index file to determine
> weather a mail i read or not? can users move or copy mail?
> Thanks in advance
> Bes
Hi,
On my server with many mails in one folder and slow IO, getting the mail
listing in the cur/ folder is becoming a serious bottleneck. Dovecot is
the only thing accessing the mail folders, so would there be any way to
avoid getting a listing all the time?
johannes
signature.asc
Description:
Am Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2007 schrieb Kyle Wheeler:
> Another one I use often is:
> find ./tmp ./cur -type f -exec rm {} \;
Current GNU finds understand the -delete action:
find ./tmp ./cur -type f -delete
That should be as fast as the "ls" solution without getting you in trouble
if a \r m
On 18.7.2007, at 19.03, Johannes Berg wrote:
On my server with many mails in one folder and slow IO, getting the
mail
listing in the cur/ folder is becoming a serious bottleneck.
Dovecot is
the only thing accessing the mail folders, so would there be any
way to
avoid getting a listing all
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 12:52 +0100, Mike Brudenell wrote:
> Ah! After a bit of test programming I understand what's going on now.
Could you try that both of these patches work:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/89184bad9d10
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/cc8b6e73e830
I'm not sure from wha
Hi,
If you mean you wish for people to able to add to their personal baysian
filter I create a folder that is searched every minuit and reported as
spam or not spam with a script and crontab. I don't think all users
should be able to report to a spamserver as they may report unwanted
mail alt
On Wednesday, July 18 at 06:03 PM, quoth Johannes Berg:
On my server with many mails in one folder and slow IO, getting the
mail listing in the cur/ folder is becoming a serious bottleneck.
Dovecot is the only thing accessing the mail folders, so would there
be any way to avoid getting a listin
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha1.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha1.tar.gz.sig
This is the first alpha release of Dovecot v1.1. I hope that it
stabilizes into final release within a few months. There are a lot of
new features since v1.0. The mos
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 06:37 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> + When saving messages, update cache file immediately with the data
> that we expect client to fetch later. Maildir-only currently.
This is wrong actually. It works with cydir and mbox also.
signature.asc
Description: This
Hello Timo!
Is the deliver/index update code also included for mbox mailboxes?
Ciao,
Gerhard
--
http://www.wiesinger.com/
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha1.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha1.tar.gz
On 19.7.2007, at 8.51, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello Timo!
Is the deliver/index update code also included for mbox mailboxes?
Yes
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Jon,
I have limited number of users. They are IT specialists and I can
trust them.
In CommuniGate Pro I've created 2 public folders - Spam and Harm. When
I create new account, these folders become visible automatically. Then
SA checks it periodically.
Is it possible to do same things with Dov
Dear All,
Is it possible to store shared folder lists in an LDAP Directory along
with your virtual users?
Will check the wiki too.
Thanks,
Gavin.
--
Kind Regards,
Gavin Henry.
Managing Director.
T +44 (0) 1224 279484
M +44 (0) 7930 323266
F +44 (0) 1224 824887
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open Sour
Hi,
If you mean you wish for people to able to add to their personal baysian
filter I create a folder that is searched every minuit and reported as
spam or not spam with a script and crontab. I don't think all users
should be able to report to a spamserver as they may report unwanted
mail althoug
20 matches
Mail list logo
