-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
a) Accept that replication process can lose changes, and require a full
resync when it gets back up. This of course means that all users'
mailboxes need to be scanned, which can be slow.
If you generate (i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Francisco Reyes wrote:
I am basically suggesting to log all the changes to a log(s) and have a
separate program handle passing on the information to the slaves.
That's the old OpenLDAP way.
However, it's surprising that you ha
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 16:22 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 16:02 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > - A combined LIST + STATUS command (or possibly NOTIFY extension?
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gulbrandsen-imap-notify-03)
>
> If anyone considered reading that, read a n
Hi List,
This is my first post to this list so please be gentle :-).
First of all, kudos to the developers of dovecot!
Im trying to implement quota, and I followed the instructions in the wiki.
My problem is the quota specified per user is not being honored, only the
global quota setting.
I do h
On 22.5.2007, at 12.26, Kenneth Oncinian wrote:
passdb:
driver: ldap
args: /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf
userdb:
driver: passwd
userdb:
driver: ldap
args: /etc/dovecot- ldap.conf
userdb:
driver: prefetch
I think you don't want the userdb passwd in there. If the user is
found f
Hi Timo,
You said it was solved since 1.0.rc29 but i am using 1.0.0 . After i try to
start dovecot while dovecot is working i take below error
May 22 12:36:03 mailtest mail:err|error dovecot: imap-login: No
authentication sockets found
Maybe you can check this issue.
Thanx and best regards Timo.
Add some const's. I think patch is self-explaining :)
--
Andrey Panin| Linux and UNIX system administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net
# HG changeset patch
# User Andrey Panin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Date 1179812865 -14400
# Node ID a486a946dfa135e8c7d4083
Dear Timo,
How about managedsieve?
Regards,
Steve
"Timo Sirainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Francisco Reyes spake the following on 5/20/2007 5:21 PM:
> Timo Sirainen writes:
>
>> "Set pop3_uidl_format setting in config file"
>> "pop3_uidl_format setting is missing from config file"
>> "Set pop3_uidl_format in config file"
>
> How about:
> You have choosen to run POP3. The setting pop3_u
Timo Sirainen spake the following on 5/21/2007 3:22 PM:
> On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:38 -0400, Paul A wrote:
>
>> Here is my config file.
>
> You didn't have "protocols" line there. By default Dovecot only listens
> for IMAP connections. If you want POP3 you'll need to add pop3 there.
>
>> passd
Paul A spake the following on 5/21/2007 10:38 AM:
> We currently had dovecote 99 running and ran into some issues with it,
> mainly our pop3 sessions timeout and were slow.
>
> I upgraded to the latest version and im serving imap with pop3 using pam.
>
> Heres my pam file:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 15:44 +0400, Andrey Panin wrote:
> Add some const's. I think patch is self-explaining :)
Committed. I even managed to do the import right the first time. :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 16:09 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
> # Protocols we want to be serving: imap imaps pop3 pop3s
> # If you only want to use dovecot-auth, you can set this to "none".
> #protocols = imap imaps pop3 pop3s
>
>
> So this is NOT the default, although the conf file states such?
Where
Dear all,
I would like to use shared folders but I'm not quite sure whether
Dovecot supports it the way I want it:
-user A should be able to share a folder with users B, C, D
-B, C and D should have read-access to this folder
Did anyone implement shared folders like this?
Regards,
David
--
T
* Uldis Pakuls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In Debian bug reports I found following post (15/04/2007):
> "-fstack-protector works fine with glibc 2.5, or with '-lssp' if ssp
> support is /not/ included in libc. Debian 4.0 is currently broken in
> this way (as of libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13), so it would be nic
I have to face it, my users are retards:
* either they're using crap MUAs which will not display their quota to them
* or they're using POP with "leave mail on server" and will never
notice their quota, unless it's too late
* and once their quota is exceeded, their mails will bounce -- they'll
Hi there,
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I have to face it, my users are retards:
Every one have such users... :)
* either they're using crap MUAs which will not display their quota to them
* or they're using POP with "leave mail on server" and will never
notice their quota,
We have for many years been a UW-IMAP site, with users having their own
traditional, private, mbox-format INBOX and folders: almost (but not
quite) no complications of shared or simultaneous access. We have just
completed a transparent transition to dovecot (official 1.0.0 release).
But we have o
On 5/21/07, Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have to face it, my users are retards:
Level1: "You ALMOST exceeded your quota, you're at 90% now"
Level2: "You're very close to exceededin your quota, you're at 95% now"
Level3: "Would you please clean up now? You're at 99% now"
I use
David Lee wrote:
> We have for many years been a UW-IMAP site, with users having their own
> traditional, private, mbox-format INBOX and folders: almost (but not
> quite) no complications of shared or simultaneous access. We have just
> completed a transparent transition to dovecot (official 1.0.0
This initial proposal for a Feature Request is the result of my desire
to implement quotas, but not have the attendant headaches that
inevitably accompany its implementation.
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I have to face it, my users are retards:
Is there any other kind of user? ;)
> Thus I nee
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:22:46PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 18:49 +0200, Rachid Zarouali wrote:
> > hy all,
> >
> > i'm trying to make an acl so a local unix user 'sie' can access exalead
> > mboxes.
> > my exalead mboxes are stored in :
> > /opt/exalead/mail/sie/
> ..
> > This increases communication and locking significantly. The locking alone
> > will likely be a choke point.
>
> My plan would require the locking only when the mailbox is being updated
> and the global lock isn't already owned by the server. If you want to
> avoid different servers from cons
Timo Sirainen spake the following on 5/22/2007 5:38 AM:
> On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 16:09 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
>> # Protocols we want to be serving: imap imaps pop3 pop3s
>> # If you only want to use dovecot-auth, you can set this to "none".
>> #protocols = imap imaps pop3 pop3s
>>
>>
>> So this
Can I define where dovecot.pid should be in the config file on 1.0.0?
Nothing is being written to /var/run/dovecot, even after I changed
the ownership to dovecot.
Thanks,
Zeke
--
James "Zeke" Dehnert
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +1 707.546.6620 x602 Fax: +1 707.324.8043
"Life is raci
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I knew I was authenticating against pam. Didnt do an ls -l of the
/var/run/dovecot. Wouldnt a restart of dovecot fix that though?
Correct, the concept was *before* you restarted the daemon, to try and
capture as much info first. It's hard when you're under the gu
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:59:50PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:19:15PM -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
> > Timo Sirainen wrote the following on 5/20/2007 1:45 PM -0800:
> > > On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 22:53 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > >
> > >> So, beginning the move by s
hi...
i trying to have a secure conetion between dovecot and directory server, but
i cant do it. The documentation are so poor (
http://wiki.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/LDAP)
these are my configurations files:
(pre: i have a directory server accepting secure conections (port 389 via
TLS and port 636
On 5/22/07, Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. Have two 'special' user-specific folders (by special, I mean like the
Drafts, Sent, Templates folders) that dovecot controls:
These are just special in terms of the client side of things. The
only special folder might be 'Trash' and var
Gabriel Millerd wrote:
On 5/22/07, Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. Have two 'special' user-specific folders (by special, I mean
like the Drafts, Sent, Templates folders) that dovecot controls:
These are just special in terms of the client side of things.
Special, in that the us
On 21.5.2007, at 19.59, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:19:15PM -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote the following on 5/20/2007 1:45 PM -0800:
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 22:53 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So, beginning the move by shutting down Postfix and Mailman..
W
On 5/22/07, Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your taking control of my email and not delivering it?
That is not what I said - it is delivered - the system admin simply
prevents the end user from seeing it unless/until they rectify their
over-quota condition.
Unlikely the user wi
Your taking control of my email and not delivering it?
That is not what I said - it is delivered - the system admin simply
prevents the end user from seeing it unless/until they rectify their
over-quota condition.
Unlikely the user will see the difference in deliver and received.
Sure they
33 matches
Mail list logo
