Hi !
I am still a bit annoyed with the way that Sieve plugin handles
multiple delivery into the same folder.
For reference :
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-January/019029.html
Summary :
When a same message (same message-id) is to be delivered twice into
the same mailbox, it
Hi,
I'd like to run a mailing list archive via IMAP like for this list but
my mails are in maildir and not mbox.
It's easy to add a new user that has access to the maildir that mails
get stored in, and I can simply link that up to that user's inbox. It's
also easy to prevent putting mail into tha
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 14:27 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to run a mailing list archive via IMAP like for this list but
> my mails are in maildir and not mbox.
>
> It's easy to add a new user that has access to the maildir that mails
> get stored in, and I can simply link that up
On 25/03/2007 13:39, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 14:27 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
[...]
However, one thing I'm not clear on is how to prevent that user from
creating new folders.
[...]
Oh, I found a solution already. Make the maildir read-only and put
CONTROL/INDEX elsewhere i
On 25.3.2007, at 13.49, Vincent Bernat wrote:
Is it possible to maintain a list of recent
message-id and mailbox couples to avoid to deliver again a message to
the same mailbox ?
It should be pretty easy to modify the sources to do this. There's
duplicate.h which provides an API to marki
On 25/03/2007 15:12, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I guess this duplicate checking could be done, but I wouldn't want it
enabled by default.
You've got to be careful anyway, these so-called duplicates often come
via different routes (e.g. directly and via a mailing list), may have
been processed diffe
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 13:45 +0100, John Robinson wrote:
> You could also take a look at the ACL plugin.
Ah, good point, thanks. It probably gives better error messages then
too :)
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hm, so my mailing list archive is up, but when I add nopassword to the
list of settings in my passdb passwd-file I get:
file auth-request.c: line 924 (auth_request_set_field): assertion
failed: (request->passdb_password == NULL)
Raw backtrace: dovecot-auth [0x806be11] -> dovecot-auth [0x806bd8c] -
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 14:52 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hm, so my mailing list archive is up, but when I add nopassword to the
> list of settings in my passdb passwd-file I get:
>
> file auth-request.c: line 924 (auth_request_set_field): assertion
> failed: (request->passdb_password == NULL)
Fi
On March 24, 2007 7:39:23 PM +0100 Milan Holzäpfel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
on my system, I have a copy of /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver located
in /usr/libexec/dovecot/postfix-deliver/deliver (only accessible to
postfix and with SUID root permissions). If I happen to forget to
update t
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 12:47 -0700, Frank Cusack wrote:
> > Should I just set version_ignore=yes and remember myself to upgrade it,
> > or could deliver return a code signaling "temporary failure", or should
> > I rather make postfix interpret 89 as temporary failure? (don't know by
> > heart whethe
[introduction: new to the list, used dovecot w/exim as MTA in
simple ways for 2 years, blah blah blah]
i'm trying to get exim to use dovecot auth with a copy of
rc27 and am missing something that's probably quite simple.
specifically, how does one configure the authenticators
in dovecot.conf fo
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 18:16 -0400, Richard P. Welty wrote:
> what i'm seeing in other documentation; instead of
>
> auth default {
>
> }
>
> i'm seeing
>
> auth = default
Then you're looking at v0.99.x version's configuration file.
> followed by lots of standard flags prefixed by auth_,
> but
> -n: If the destination mailbox doesn't exist, don't create it. This affects
> both -m parameter and fileinfo action in Sieve scripts. The fallback is to
> deliver mail to INBOX.
>
> (typo: fileinto not fileinfo)
>
> My testing shows that if the mailbox does not exist then the mail is
> rejected
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 03:26 -0400, Jim Horner wrote:
> I took a stab at editing the wiki ... the changes disappeared? I guess I was
> overruled.
I've seen anonymous edits, so they should work. Did you write the
captcha? If you didn't, it should have given a nice red warning that the
changes weren
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 20:35 +0100, Láďa wrote:
> Yes it contains Wiki. But what about having some kind of "unofficial
> wiki"
> there? This works very nice e.g. in Gentoo, where Gentoo-wiki is some
> kind
> of add-on to official documentation.
I could add an "UnofficialWiki" link to the main page
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 13:08 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> We've seen two issues come up with Dovecot LDA, both of which have
> caused us problems:
>
> 1) If the user's home directory does not exist, or is not owned by them,
> deliver fails and causes the mail message to bounce back to the
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 14:19 -0400, bofh list wrote:
> We are seeing some poor performance recently that is focused around
> users with large mailboxes (100,000 message /INBOX, 80,000 message
> subfolders, etc).
>
> The performance problem manifests as very high system% utilization -
> basically io
> > My testing shows that if the mailbox does not exist then the mail is
> > rejected like so:
>
> So it seems. Fixed:
> http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2007-March/008355.html
Verified.
Thanks. The small "feature" of ignoring "" for -m is really going to save us a
lot of sieve writing. Than
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 03:23:12AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 13:08 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> > We've seen two issues come up with Dovecot LDA, both of which have
> > caused us problems:
> >
> > 1) If the user's home directory does not exist, or is not owned by the
On 26.3.2007, at 5.26, Steven F Siirila wrote:
We are using rc24 on one server, rc27 on another. Are you saying
that it
should deliver e-mail to my INBOX (in rc27) even if my home is over
quota?
I will need to double-check, but I thought this was not the case in
either
rc24 or rc27, and t
Hi all,
I have continuously experienced a new mail not appearing problem in Outlook
2003 on Windows XP. Using Dovecot 0.99.14 on Debian Sarge and now in 1.0rc26
and rc27.
The problem exhibits itself as:
Some new mail is randomly(?) not shown in my mailbox. More new mail does
appear, so it's diffi
On 3/26/07, Karl von Randow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have continuously experienced a new mail not appearing problem in Outlook
2003 on Windows XP. Using Dovecot 0.99.14 on Debian Sarge and now in 1.0rc26
and rc27.
The problem exhibits itself as:
Some new mail is randomly(?) not show
Thanks Juha, nice to see you here :) Yes I'm definitely considering a move
to Thunderbird; I've even downloaded and installed it... But migrations
pains aside I'd quite like to leave Outlook on good terms and if it is an
incompatibility between Outlook and Dovecot it is better fixed.
I did consid
I forgot to add. It is possibly to do with two pieces of email arriving at
the same time, or very close to each other. For example, Juha's reply was
addressed to me and to the list, but only the addressed directly to me
showed up in my INBOX initially. The two delivery dates are:
Delivery-date: Mon
On 3/26/07, Karl von Randow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I forgot to add. It is possibly to do with two pieces of email arriving at
the same time, or very close to each other. For example, Juha's reply was
addressed to me and to the list, but only the addressed directly to me
showed up in my INBOX
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 16:55 +1200, Karl von Randow wrote:
> I forgot to add. It is possibly to do with two pieces of email arriving at
> the same time, or very close to each other. For example, Juha's reply was
> addressed to me and to the list, but only the addressed directly to me
> showed up in
Yes I do have that on, and outlook-idle.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Timo Sirainen
Sent: Monday, 26 March 2007 5:09 p.m.
To: Karl von Randow
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] New mail not appearing consistently in Outlook 2
Thanks I'll try to track that option down. The missing new mail doesn't
appear if I press Send & Receive, is the control-m the same? I will try it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Juha Saarinen
Sent: Monday, 26 March 2007 5:00 p.m.
To: Karl
On 3/26/07, Karl von Randow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks I'll try to track that option down. The missing new mail doesn't
appear if I press Send & Receive, is the control-m the same? I will try it.
Ctrl-M's the same, yes.
--
Juha
http://www.geekzone.co.nz/juha
Karl von Randow wrote:
> Thanks I'll try to track that option down. The missing new mail doesn't
> appear if I press Send & Receive, is the control-m the same? I will try it.
>
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/300479
Also please don't top post -
http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
James Turnbull wrote:
> Karl von Randow wrote:
>> Thanks I'll try to track that option down. The missing new mail
>> doesn't appear if I press Send & Receive, is the control-m the same?
>> I will try it.
>>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/300479
>
> Also please don't top post -
> http://www.ca
I pasted the output of gdb. I hope it is usefull. Thanx
This GDB was configured as "powerpc-ibm-aix5.1.0.0"...
Core was generated by `imap'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0xd1a468cc in i_malloc ()
from /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so
(gdb) bt full
Karl von Randow wrote:
> I will observe what is logged when I receive this message from the mailing
> list (and CC'd to myself). Is there any guide or advice from previous
> debugging-using-outlook-logs experience that would make my bug reporting
> more valuable?
No specific advice. I guess the o
I have a strange problem. I installed Dovecot and had my trash folder and
such in the root of my maildir, and everything was working great. I then
installed SquirrelMail which created folders in with the INBOX. prefix. I
manually removed these from the maildir, but the INBOX.Trash is still show
Den 26-03-2007 08:29, Kevin Bowling skrev:
I have a strange problem. I installed Dovecot and had my trash folder and
such in the root of my maildir, and everything was working great. I then
installed SquirrelMail which created folders in with the INBOX. prefix. I
manually removed these from th
On 3/25/07, Christian Skarby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Den 26-03-2007 08:29, Kevin Bowling skrev:
> I have a strange problem. I installed Dovecot and had my trash folder and
> such in the root of my maildir, and everything was working great. I then
> installed SquirrelMail which created folder
Den 26-03-2007 08:59, Kevin Bowling skrev:
On 3/25/07, Christian Skarby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Den 26-03-2007 08:29, Kevin Bowling skrev:
> I have a strange problem. I installed Dovecot and had my trash
folder and
> such in the root of my maildir, and everything was working great. I
then
James Turnbull wrote:
> Karl von Randow wrote:
>> I will observe what is logged when I receive this message from the
>> mailing list (and CC'd to myself). Is there any guide or advice from
>> previous debugging-using-outlook-logs experience that would make my
>> bug reporting more valuable?
>
> No
39 matches
Mail list logo
