be
visible in Outlook 2013, but when an email is moved into that folder, it
is no longer visible. I can ssh into the server, drill down to that
sub-folder and see the email in the folder AND it is also available to
be seen without issue in Thunderbird.
I know this is a
In the past few weeks, newly created folders will be
> visible in Outlook 2013, but when an email is moved into that folder, it is
> no longer visible. I can ssh into the server, drill down to that sub-folder
> and see the email in the folder AND it is also available
Good Day!
I have a fairly new user on my network that has, over about
10 months, created in root inbox and nested sub-folders totaling over 900
individual folders.
In the past few weeks, newly created folders will be visible
in Outlook 2013, but when an
? Is any other
MUA running in the background when attempting to use Outlook? I have no idea
at this point what your problem is. I have a basic Dovecot configuration, and
it seems to work fine with Outlook 2013. This is the Dovecot config:
# 2.2.18: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeon
] On Behalf Of Robert
Schetterer
Sent: 30 June 2015 18:05
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Outlook 2013 not fetching new mail/synchronization issues
Am 30.06.2015 um 13:06 schrieb Dragos Pacher:
> There is also an antivirus running on client with antispam module. I
> will try to disable
Am 30.06.2015 um 13:06 schrieb Dragos Pacher:
> There is also an antivirus running on client with antispam module. I will
> try to disable it and see
> if there is any change.
>
> Pacher Dragos
yeah most problems are depend to such software
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
h
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:44:07 +0300, Dragos Pacher stated:
>I would say Outlook is standard IMAP configuration:
>IMAP, 993 SSL, root folder path: "INBOX." and timeout on 1 minute.
I assume you are actually subscribed to those folders. You might want to
check. Also, why do you have a root folder pa
ovecot.org] On Behalf Of Jerry
Sent: 30 June 2015 14:31
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: Outlook 2013 not fetching new mail/synchronization issues
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:07:53 +0300, Dragos Pacher stated:
>I will try there too. So, this is not Dovecot related ?
I am not really sure? I don&#
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:07:53 +0300, Dragos Pacher stated:
>I will try there too. So, this is not Dovecot related ?
I am not really sure? I don't know how you have Outlook configured, so I
cannot definitively say. I just know that I don't have the problem that you
have.
By the way, please don't "
Ok,
I will try there too. So, this is not Dovecot related ?
Pacher Dragos
-Original Message-
From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Jerry
Sent: 30 June 2015 13:00
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: Outlook 2013 not fetching new mail/synchronization issues
On
terer'; dovecot@dovecot.org; je...@seibercom.net
Subject: RE: Outlook 2013 not fetching new mail/synchronization issues
Hi all,
Robert, Jerry,
There were new emails overnight and both Thunderbird and Roundcube displayed
them.
I enabled Outlook debug mode and please find 2 logs of Send/Receive w
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:29:38 +0300, Dragos Pacher stated:
>There were new emails overnight and both Thunderbird and Roundcube displayed
>them.
>
>I enabled Outlook debug mode and please find 2 logs of Send/Receive with no
>new emails.
It appears that Outlook considers these messages as all ready
H 1:14232 (UID FLAGS)
IMAP: 09:09:17 [db] OnNotify: asOld = 5, asNew = 5, ae = 3
IMAP: 09:09:17 [rx] * 1 FETCH (UID 1 FLAGS (\Seen))
IMAP: 09:09:17 [db] Connection to 'imap.server.cz' closed.
IMAP: 09:09:17 [db] OnNotify: asOld = 5, asNew = 0, ae = 5"
Pacher Dragos
-Original Me
, have you checked this ?
have you tried thunderbird on the same machine ?
>
>
> Dovecot 2.2.10 CentOS 6 64 bit.
>
>
>
> We are having terrible synchronization issues with Outlook 2013 (all
> updates) on Windows 7 SP1 and 8.1 hosts (all updates).
>
>
>
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:08:45 +0300, Dragos Pacher stated:
>We are having terrible synchronization issues with Outlook 2013 (all
>updates) on Windows 7 SP1 and 8.1 hosts (all updates).
Have you tried putting Outlook into "debug" mode (it requires a restart) and
seeing what it s
Hi all,
Dovecot 2.2.10 CentOS 6 64 bit.
We are having terrible synchronization issues with Outlook 2013 (all
updates) on Windows 7 SP1 and 8.1 hosts (all updates).
Scenario:
1. Emails were sent since user closed Outlook
2. Next day: start computer, open outlook
3
mespaces to the same folder so you don't have
this mail/mail/ goofiness.
If you want to share a single e-mail account across multiple PCs running
Outlook 2013, you _cannot_ use the "Root Folder" of "mail" as I have
indicated above. The workaround is to create each subsequ
>
> michael
Stripping headers is particular to M$ Outlook. M$ Outlook 2013 strips
headers when moving email between IMAP folders. This is a known issue:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/8eafe714-8a8c-44bc-9228-d6a68731494f/outlook-2013-behavior-as-an-imap-client?forum=os_exchangeprotocols
Quoting David.M.Clark :
Outlook also has a declaration that as of either version 2010 or
2013, they no longer download IMAP headers, they download the whole
message - thank God for faster Internet connections these days -
could you imagine that in the older dialup days? Still it is a waste
ovecot/79231
I have not struck this for other sites using Outlook 2013 (though I
continually banter that Outlook version 'anything' is designed for MS
Exchange and nothing else), but then again I have not had Outlook
needing to share the same e-mail accounts across PCs.
So the bottom li
Hi All,
Sorry for the extra e-mail. Given I am helping roll out this identical
setup again I am thinking I will test another approach which I am hoping
will work but given having two or more PCs trying to access the 'mail'
folder crashed at this site on the weekend, I went away from this. But
experienced over the weekend:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dovecot/79231
I have not struck this for other sites using Outlook 2013 (though I
continually banter that Outlook version 'anything' is designed for MS
Exchange and nothing else), but then again I have not had Outlook
Just a basic comment: Outlook is well known for its bad IMAP support.
It is really not a recommendable IMAP client. My experience is similar
to yours: it may work, then it may not work, while other clients can use
the same account without problems.
Essentially I think Outlook always beleives wha
"David.M.Clark" writes:
I do have some customers using Outlook or Windows Live Mail, and these
are for the most part working fine with IMAP - I don't do POP.
...
The issue starts when you add an IMAP user to the Outlook client and
upon opening it, initially, it tries to find a "Sent" Items fold
Hi All,
This is my first post so forgive me if this hits the wrong list.
I have been using dovecot for years happily with SendMail on mainly
CentOS servers, and my customers are starting to more and more use
Thunderbird, so my perfect model is:
Linux --> Dovecot --> SendMail --> Thunderbird
fixed, but I am past the two hour mark now with no problems...
I have absolutely no problem with MS Outlook 2013 and Dovecot and I have it
on four machines. I did have to tweak the root folder path though once. I am
not sure exactly why, but that took care of everything.
--
Jerry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> That’s odd. The one and only thing that Lookout does pretty well is IMAP.
After several hours scouring the net last night, I am surprised to hear
that. Certainly has never been my experience with outlook, especially
2013...
> > is there some special trick that google is hiding from me?
>
>
Am 10.09.2014 um 05:27 schrieb LuKreme :
> On 09 Sep 2014, at 15:09 , Bob Miller wrote:
>> I am trying really hard to wrap my head around why people insist on
>> using this program…
>
> Which program?
>
>> Where I have outlook 2013 users, I have had nothing but
il pages
>>>> open, 2 phones using imap, and a thunderbird connected to it. I
>>>> started with outlook 2007, then 2010, and now 2013 for the last 2
>>>> years or 3years (I upgraded to it in beta at first). I haven't had any
>>>> issues at
013 for the last 2
>>> years or 3years (I upgraded to it in beta at first). I haven't had any
>>> issues at all, I can delete emails, move emails, ..., and they
>>> instantly change in the other programs.
>>
>> I have several accounts tha
ey
>> instantly change in the other programs.
>
> I have several accounts that are used by a variety of different programs
> and devices, as well, but the only program that gives me any problem is
> outlook 2013. And not quite consistently, on some few machines I have
> see
On 09 Sep 2014, at 15:09 , Bob Miller wrote:
> I am trying really hard to wrap my head around why people insist on
> using this program…
Which program?
> Where I have outlook 2013 users, I have had nothing but problems getting
> their mail to work with imap. my solution has been to
and devices, as well, but the only program that gives me any problem is
outlook 2013. And not quite consistently, on some few machines I have
seen it work the same as any other client. This one particular case has
me quite baffled though.
> I just use the normal outlook2013 config options for
Quoting Bob Miller :
I am trying really hard to wrap my head around why people insist on
using this program...
Where I have outlook 2013 users, I have had nothing but problems getting
their mail to work with imap. my solution has been to set them up with
pop, which works just like it always
I am trying really hard to wrap my head around why people insist on
using this program...
Where I have outlook 2013 users, I have had nothing but problems getting
their mail to work with imap. my solution has been to set them up with
pop, which works just like it always has. Or move them to a
Hello,
i do some tests with dovecot 2.1.7 and activated a default special-use
config. To get it work with outlook 2013, i also added XLIST to imap
capability string. basically this is working.
is somebody also using special-use folders successful with outlook 2013?
yes, testet a few times
On 3.4.2013, at 14.24, Hajo Locke wrote:
>> Ugh. Not really. OK, latest v2.1 hg has passdb_import, userdb_import and
>> userdb_userdb_import and they all work.
..
> thanks, this is working. now it is possible to let the single user choose his
> favorite foldernames if client is not very helpful.
On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 17:40 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> namespace/inbox/mailbox=hallohallo^Atnamespace/inbox/mailbox/hallohallo/auto=subscribe
>
> same line occurs when querying ...userdb_import as userdb_import... in
> place of ...userdb_import as userdb_userdb_import.
http://hg.dovecot.
On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 17:40 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > namespace/inbox/mailbox=hallohallo^Atnamespace/inbox/mailbox/hallohallo/auto=subscribe
> >
> > same line occurs when querying ...userdb_import as userdb_import... in
> > place of ...userdb_import as userdb_userdb_import…
>
>
On 25.3.2013, at 17.14, Hajo Locke wrote:
>> Looks like it fixed the TAB problem. So I guess I need to fix
>> userdb_userdb_import.
>
>> Could you try if the attached patch fixes it?
>
> i added the patch and did build my packages. sql.conf i switched back to
> prefetch.
> Log looks like:
>
/mailbox/hallohallo/auto=subscribe
In this case the settings from userdb_import override this part of
conffile and folder hallohallo is autocreated and accepted by outlook
2013. (works only without prefetch)
but my goal is to put also the special_use purpose per user to userdb.
i reduced conf
conffile
and folder hallohallo is autocreated and accepted by outlook 2013. (works
only without prefetch)
but my goal is to put also the special_use purpose per user to userdb.
i reduced conf file to:
namespace inbox {
inbox = yes
}
now i extended userdb_import to:
namespace/inbox/mailbox
Hello,
Looks like it fixed the TAB problem. So I guess I need to fix
userdb_userdb_import.
Could you try if the attached patch fixes it?
i added the patch and did build my packages. sql.conf i switched back to
prefetch.
Log looks like:
Mar 25 16:01:55 myhostname dovecot: auth: Debug:
pr
On 25.3.2013, at 16.28, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Looks like it fixed the TAB problem. So I guess I need to fix
> userdb_userdb_import.
Could you try if the attached patch fixes it?
diff
Description: Binary data
On 25.3.2013, at 16.13, Hajo Locke wrote:
>>> Mar 25 13:16:49 myhostname dovecot: auth: Debug: master out: USER
>>> 3613786113 myuserhome=/home/myuser uid=1004 gid=1000
>>> namespace/inbox/hallohallo/auto=subscribe^Atnamespace/inbox/hallohallo/special_use=\Sent
>>> Looks not rea
; 2 reasons.
your choice, i would not use outlook at all,
its simply not a good internet mail client
in fact it is the client of exchange.
Alternative imternet mail clients are "good enough" now,
if sombody likes outlook he better should use it with exchange
>
> 1: outlook 201
Hello,
Also i edited the password_query (i use userdb prefetch)
password_query = SELECT `inbox` as `user`, `password`, `home` as
userdb_home, `uid` AS userdb_uid, `gid` AS userdb_gid, userdb_import as
userdb_userdb_import FROM `mail_users` WHERE `login` = '%u' AND
`active`='Y'
This results
On 25.3.2013, at 15.36, Hajo Locke wrote:
> Also i edited the password_query (i use userdb prefetch)
>
> password_query = SELECT `inbox` as `user`, `password`, `home` as userdb_home,
> `uid` AS userdb_uid, `gid` AS userdb_gid, userdb_import as
> userdb_userdb_import FROM `mail_users` WHERE `lo
have success.
i think about of moving all the special_folders stuff to userdb and let
every user decide on its own.
2 reasons.
1: outlook 2013 and may be other clients only work correct if
special_folders on server are autocreated (auto=subscribe). Even when adding
the special_folders
Am 25.03.2013 12:18, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Is it possible to adjust some settings in outlook 2013 fo fix this?
> not that i know, but i will investigate, guess there are ways to fix it
> there maybe some reg hacks, but dont go there until they are not official
>
if you
Am 25.03.2013 09:23, schrieb Hajo Locke:
> Hello,
>
> i do some tests with dovecot 2.1.7 and activated a default special-use
> config. To get it work with outlook 2013, i also added XLIST to imap
> capability string. basically this is working.
>
> is somebody also usin
Hello,
i do some tests with dovecot 2.1.7 and activated a default special-use
config. To get it work with outlook 2013, i also added XLIST to imap
capability string. basically this is working.
is somebody also using special-use folders successful with outlook 2013? In
my understanding of
* Robert Schetterer :
> Am 05.09.2012 08:14, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
> > Try this:
> >
> > mailbox "Gesendete Objekte" {
> > special_use = \Sent
> > auto=subscribe
> > }
>
> i will do when Outlook 2013 in german
t;>
>>>> --snip
>>>> Microsoft® Outlook® 2013 Preview
>>>> Outlook 2013 Preview implements the IMAP LIST extension specified in
>>>> [RFC6154] as the XLIST command.
>>>> ---snip
>>>>
>>>> taken out of [MS
Am 05.09.2012 08:14, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
> Try this:
>
> mailbox "Gesendete Objekte" {
> special_use = \Sent
> auto=subscribe
> }
i will do when Outlook 2013 in german got released
>
> AFAIK the English version should automagically map
On Wednesday, September 05, 2012 at 06:14:10 UTC, p...@state-of-mind.de
confabulated:
> * Robert Schetterer :
>> Am 04.09.2012 10:30, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> > Hi, perhaps somebody wants to this
>> >
>> > --snip
>> > Microsoft® Outlook® 2013
* Robert Schetterer :
> Am 04.09.2012 10:30, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> > Hi, perhaps somebody wants to this
> >
> > --snip
> > Microsoft® Outlook® 2013 Preview
> > Outlook 2013 Preview implements the IMAP LIST extension specified in
> > [RFC
Am 04.09.2012 10:30, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Hi, perhaps somebody wants to this
>
> --snip
> Microsoft® Outlook® 2013 Preview
> Outlook 2013 Preview implements the IMAP LIST extension specified in
> [RFC6154] as the XLIST command.
> ---snip
>
> taken out of [MS-ST
Hi, perhaps somebody wants to this
--snip
Microsoft® Outlook® 2013 Preview
Outlook 2013 Preview implements the IMAP LIST extension specified in
[RFC6154] as the XLIST command.
---snip
taken out of [MS-STANOIMAP].pdf
which zip you may download here
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library
59 matches
Mail list logo
