Re: migration from 2.0.16

2021-01-01 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 03:56:45PM +0100, Barbara M. wrote: > Debian 10 is EOL on 2022 this may be true, but (1) you can probably expect Debian to have LTS for this - they had for the last few distributions, extending their livetimes to more than 5 years at least (I think Jessie was pulled

RE: migration from 2.0.16

2020-12-17 Thread Aki Tuomi
> On 17/12/2020 15:38 Barbara M. wrote: > > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > I would recommend using dsync migration to get rid of mbox format. We no > > longer develop that format, and bugs are limited to reading mbox format. > > Ok, but I assume that dovecot 2.3.x still supp

Re: migration from 2.0.16

2020-12-17 Thread infoomatic
On 17.12.20 15:56, Barbara M. wrote: > > We own the servers and use CT (LXC). > The IBM move is clear, but going to C7 today seems to me not a good > choice. It is in its descending stage and in a couple of years > packages are going to became very outdated. > If RH8 remain "open source" I suppos

Re: migration from 2.0.16

2020-12-17 Thread lists
: December 17, 2020 6:57 AM To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: RE: migration from 2.0.16 On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Marc Roos wrote: > I would not choose centos 8 it has EOL < than centos7. IBM is pulling > the plug on the centos distribution, and makes it more or less a beta > for the rhel.

RE: migration from 2.0.16

2020-12-17 Thread Barbara M.
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Marc Roos wrote: I would not choose centos 8 it has EOL < than centos7. IBM is pulling the plug on the centos distribution, and makes it more or less a beta for the rhel. Thus centos7 and then you have a few years to decide what to choose. Enough to go to full containerized

RE: migration from 2.0.16

2020-12-17 Thread Barbara M.
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Aki Tuomi wrote: I would recommend using dsync migration to get rid of mbox format. We no longer develop that format, and bugs are limited to reading mbox format. Ok, but I assume that dovecot 2.3.x still support mbox? (just in case the mbox --> MailDir migration give m

RE: migration from 2.0.16

2020-12-17 Thread Marc Roos
=132 -Original Message- From: Aki Tuomi [mailto:aki.tu...@open-xchange.com] Sent: 17 December 2020 10:16 To: Marc Roos; barbara; dovecot Subject: RE: migration from 2.0.16 I would recommend using dsync migration to get rid of mbox format. We no longer develop that format, and bugs are

RE: migration from 2.0.16

2020-12-17 Thread Aki Tuomi
> > > > -Original Message- > From: Barbara M. [mailto:barb...@rfx.it] > Sent: 17 December 2020 01:47 > To: dovecot@dovecot.org > Subject: migration from 2.0.16 > > > I have an old server with CentOS 6.x and dovecot 2.0.16 (postfix-2.6.6 > and roundcube), th

RE: migration from 2.0.16

2020-12-17 Thread Marc Roos
age- From: Barbara M. [mailto:barb...@rfx.it] Sent: 17 December 2020 01:47 To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: migration from 2.0.16 I have an old server with CentOS 6.x and dovecot 2.0.16 (postfix-2.6.6 and roundcube), that was an update from a 1.x many years ago ... Users in /etc/passwd Mailbo

migration from 2.0.16

2020-12-16 Thread Barbara M.
I have an old server with CentOS 6.x and dovecot 2.0.16 (postfix-2.6.6 and roundcube), that was an update from a 1.x many years ago ... Users in /etc/passwd Mailbox format mbox some filtering via procmail About 5.000 users, 1 TB data (/var/mail + /home/users) Obviously I am searching for a sm