That's a nice suggestion. Thanks John.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 11:25 PM John Fawcett via dovecot
wrote:
>
>
> On 12/07/2024 13:05, Jeff Pang via dovecot wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does the community version of dovecot have the replication feature?
> > When one dovecot was down, another one could t
On 12/07/2024 21:14, James Cook wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 06:28:13PM GMT, John Fawcett via dovecot wrote:
Hi James
I want to avoid the -1 parameter because it doesn't do deletes in the
target.
-l, not -1.
Thanks I missed that - so locking can be done within Dovecot
John
__
> On 07/12/2024 1:14 PM MDT James Cook via dovecot wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 06:28:13PM GMT, John Fawcett via dovecot wrote:
> >Hi James
> >
> >I want to avoid the -1 parameter because it doesn't do deletes in the
> >target.
>
> -l, not -1.
No, it's -1 - as in one(1)-way sync.
-l (low
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 06:28:13PM GMT, John Fawcett via dovecot wrote:
Hi James
I want to avoid the -1 parameter because it doesn't do deletes in the
target.
-l, not -1.
As for the lda to doveadm sync script, I have been wondering too about
how to close the gap for emails arriving between
On 12/07/2024 17:38, James Cook via dovecot wrote:
Replication is in the current dovecot version but will go away in 2.4.
The doveadm sync feature is staying. So with some work you can set it
up what you are requesting.
I used to use replication and now I'm thinking about using sync but
hav
Replication is in the current dovecot version but will go away in 2.4.
The doveadm sync feature is staying. So with some work you can set it
up what you are requesting.
I used to use replication and now I'm thinking about using sync but
have not implemented it. The following are thoughs on it
On 12/07/2024 13:05, Jeff Pang via dovecot wrote:
Hello,
Does the community version of dovecot have the replication feature?
When one dovecot was down, another one could take over the tasks.
Thanks.
_
Jeff
Replication is in t
Hello,
Does the community version of dovecot have the replication feature?
When one dovecot was down, another one could take over the tasks.
Thanks.
_
Your E-Mail. Your Cloud.
Hi,
I am experiencing similar error messages when setting passdb to
mechanisms = plain login.
More details can be found at
https://github.com/orgs/docker-mailserver/discussions/3836.
I hope this information helps.
Regards,
James
On 5/07/2024 02:32, Oliver Krone via dovecot wrote:
Hi the
Hi there,
I'm experiencing the following when I replicate mails between two host,
using different versions of dovecot:
*Host A Host B result*
dovecot-2.3-19 --> dovecort-2.3.16 ERROR: auth: Error: All
password databases were skipped.
dovea
Hi,
I'm a but clueless, having issues with replication. `doveadm dsync -u hans`
works.
But using the following replication setup, I see coredumps.
Where to go next?
Interestingly not for all users. (For testing purposes I've only 2
users. One having about 20 messages: here even the replication
a.rna.nl/the-book/>
> Book: Mastering ArchiMate <https://ea.rna.nl/the-book-edition-iii/>
>
>> On 15 Jan 2023, at 23:12, Tomaz Kavcic > <mailto:tomaz.kav...@futurion.si>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a question in regards to specific dovecot
e a question in regards to specific dovecot replication behaviour and
> I'm just wondering if this is actually an expected/normal behaviour, or just
> a version issue.
>
> I'm using dovecot 2.3.16 which is packed by default with latest Ubuntu
> 22.04.1 LTS server release.
Hello,
I have a question in regards to specific dovecot replication behaviour
and I'm just wondering if this is actually an expected/normal behaviour,
or just a version issue.
I'm using dovecot 2.3.16 which is packed by default with latest Ubuntu
22.04.1 LTS server releas
Just a prcision... maybe I misunderstood point
I saw in different posts, that an RSYNC may corrupt the database and
cause trouble... therefore, we need a replication system.
1) I have 2 different servers, running (email server with dovecot) ..
Server 1 and Server 2 ( backup system) . if they
Hi,
I am trying using a replication. Here is my config : 10-mail.conf.
Before going " on real life " I try to make a very basic example... but
without any success :-( bad start
I took the config example on dovecot wiki
The idea is to replicate the user: "user1" on a different server IP
17
Here it is:
/# ls -l /var/www/html/ooo/its-test
total 12
-rw-rw-r-- 1 vmail vmail 549 nov 18 17:36 OoO.sieve
lrwxrwxrwx 1 vmail vmail 9 nov 25 15:38 script -> OoO.sieve
-rw-rw-r-- 1 vmail vmail 160 nov 25 12:38 script.svbin
drwxrwxr-x 2 www-data vmail 4096 dic 1 07:41 tmp/
Inside
Hello
What have you stored in /var/www/html/ooo/its-test?
Kind regards,
Christian Mack
Am 01.12.21 um 09:27 schrieb Claudio Corvino:
> Hi,
>
> nobody can help here?
>
> Thanks
>
> On 02/11/21 15:47, Claudio Corvino wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have two IMAP/LMTP Dovecot server in replica (version
Hi,
nobody can help here?
Thanks
On 02/11/21 15:47, Claudio Corvino wrote:
Hi,
I have two IMAP/LMTP Dovecot server in replica (version 2.3.4.1) for
testing purposes, both connected through an IPsec tunnel, I use
LDAP/AD for /userdb, /all seems to work fine except for these errors
present
Hi,
I have two IMAP/LMTP Dovecot server in replica (version 2.3.4.1) for
testing purposes, both connected through an IPsec tunnel, I use LDAP/AD
for /userdb, /all seems to work fine except for these errors present in
logs every day:
NODE A:
/doveadm: Error: sieve: file storage: utime(/var/w
to monitor this. OpenNMS polls this check every 5
> min and if it gives a fail result
> I have an alarm. Maybe this helps a little bit to understand my problem.
>
> Regards,
> Oliver
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org
result
> I have an alarm. Maybe this helps a little bit to understand my problem.
>
> Regards,
> Oliver
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] Im Auftrag von Andrea
> Gabellini
> Gesendet: Montag, 15. Februar 2021 11:04
> An: S
this helps a little bit to understand my problem.
Regards,
Oliver
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] Im Auftrag von Andrea
Gabellini
Gesendet: Montag, 15. Februar 2021 11:04
An: Steven Varco; dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: Monitoring Dovecot Repli
Hello,
here my script. I'm not a professional programmer... ;-)
Andrea
Il 12/02/21 17:53, Steven Varco ha scritto:
> Hi Andrea
>
> It would be great if oyu could post that here, as I (and possibly others)
> would also be interested. :)
>
> thanks,
> Steven
>
--
__
hAS
mode).
>
> If you want to try it I can send it to you.
>
> Andrea
>
> Il 12/02/21 11:47, MK ha scritto:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a cluster with two dovecot nodes with dovecot replication between
>> them.
>> The setup works fine and now I&#
Hello,
I wrote a little script for Check_MK (MRPE mode).
If you want to try it I can send it to you.
Andrea
Il 12/02/21 11:47, MK ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> I have a cluster with two dovecot nodes with dovecot replication between
> them.
> The setup works fine and now I'm
Hello,
I have a cluster with two dovecot nodes with dovecot replication between them.
The setup works fine and now I'm searching for a way to monitor the users so
that I can get an information if the replication fails for one user for a
longer time and I have to trigger the replic
Am 19.11.20 um 09:30 schrieb James Pattinson:
On 18/11/2020 19:37, Aakash Patel wrote:
Hello,
I have two mail servers and am also experiencing sporadic replication
errors over tcps, similar to Reuben. Each server is running Dovecot
2.3.11.3 (502c39af9) on Debian 10.6.
*Log entries from MX1
On 18/11/2020 19:37, Aakash Patel wrote:
Hello,
I have two mail servers and am also experiencing sporadic replication
errors over tcps, similar to Reuben. Each server is running Dovecot
2.3.11.3 (502c39af9) on Debian 10.6.
*Log entries from MX1*
Nov 18 00:39:26 mx1 dovecot:
dsync-local(u.
Hello,
I have two mail servers and am also experiencing sporadic replication
errors over tcps, similar to Reuben. Each server is running Dovecot
2.3.11.3 (502c39af9) on Debian 10.6.
*Log entries from MX1*
Nov 18 00:39:26 mx1 dovecot:
dsync-local(u...@example.com): Error:
dsync(mx2.example.c
On 10/27/2020 7:56 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 27/10/2020 14:49 jayare-dcml at outlook.com wrote:
On 26/10/2020 19:25, John Fawcett wrote:
On 25/10/2020 17:19, jayare~dcml at videocoding.org wrote:
I've got a basic dovecot master-master replication setup between two
servers (imap1 and imap2). A
> On 27/10/2020 14:49 Justin Ridge wrote:
>
>
> On 26/10/2020 19:25, John Fawcett wrote:
> > On 25/10/2020 17:19, jayare~dcml at videocoding.org wrote:
> >> I've got a basic dovecot master-master replication setup between two
> >> servers (imap1 and imap2). Actions such as deleting messages or
> On 27/10/2020 14:49 Justin Ridge wrote:
>
>
> On 26/10/2020 19:25, John Fawcett wrote:
> > On 25/10/2020 17:19, jayare~dcml at videocoding.org wrote:
> >> I've got a basic dovecot master-master replication setup between two
> >> servers (imap1 and imap2). Actions such as deleting messages or
On 26/10/2020 19:25, John Fawcett wrote:
> On 25/10/2020 17:19, jayare~dcml at videocoding.org wrote:
>> I've got a basic dovecot master-master replication setup between two
>> servers (imap1 and imap2). Actions such as deleting messages or moving
>> them between folders are replicated correctly an
On 25/10/2020 17:19, jayare~d...@videocoding.org wrote:
> I've got a basic dovecot master-master replication setup between two
> servers (imap1 and imap2). Actions such as deleting messages or moving
> them between folders are replicated correctly and quickly.
>
> However, when new mail is delivere
I've got a basic dovecot master-master replication setup between two
servers (imap1 and imap2). Actions such as deleting messages or moving
them between folders are replicated correctly and quickly.
However, when new mail is delivered by postfix, replication does not
occur until something else
Hi,
I am investigating the use of dovecot for a voicemail storage system
(which is effectively a SMTP/POP3 system), which we want to use
replication to give us some resilience.
Tests have mostly been on dovecot 2.3.8 (9df20d2db) - as packaged on
Centos 8 - but I have also used a couple of si
Hi,
I've been seeing errors logged for some time with replication processes,
whereby replication sessions seem to be timing out periodically.
This is with dovecot version 2.3.10.1 (a3d0e1171) and both are Gentoo
x86_64.
After some investigation I've determined that these timeouts are only
On 28 Nov 2019, at 00:35, Brent Clark wrote:
> We have in excess of +/- 500 mail boxes and using just under 1TB of disk
> space. That is a lot of small files.
That’s honestly pretty small. When it says "it's not recommended to be used in
multi-million user installations”
You are several orders
On 2019-11-28 18:35, Brent Clark via dovecot wrote:
Good day Guys
Just wanted to pick the communities brain and experience(s) for a
second.
At $CORP where I work. My team has inherited a single server mail
solution.
We need to look to building a standby / replicated solution.
One of the t
nterprise) how and if this solution works and scales.
In short, I am asking, is anyone else using Dovecot Replication in a
medium to large enterprise?
Can you please share your experiences, pitfalls and if you have any
tips managing mail replication.
Kindest regards and thanks in advance.
Brent Clark
ecommended to be used in multi-million user installations."
"WARNING: Shared folder replication doesn't work correctly right now –"
I would like to ask the community (and anyone else in a similar
enterprise) how and if this solution works and scales.
In short, I am asking
On 07/08/2019 09:29, Sami Ketola wrote:
On 6 Aug 2019, at 23.52, Reio Remma via dovecot wrote:
service doveadm {
user = vmail
}
This seems to have fixed it. Here's hoping for no unforeseen side-effects. :)
I still need allow dovecot_t ssh_exec_t:file { execute execute_no_trans open
re
> On 6 Aug 2019, at 23.52, Reio Remma via dovecot wrote:
>
> service doveadm {
> user = vmail
> }
>
> This seems to have fixed it. Here's hoping for no unforeseen side-effects. :)
>
> I still need allow dovecot_t ssh_exec_t:file { execute execute_no_trans open
> read }; for selinux, but
elinux
Aki
For replication over SSH I had to add the following module:
module selinux-dovecot-replication-ssh 1.0;
require {
type ssh_exec_t;
type ssh_home_t;
type dovecot_t;
class file { open read execute execute_no_trans };
class dir { getattr
dd the following module:
module selinux-dovecot-replication-ssh 1.0;
require {
type ssh_exec_t;
type ssh_home_t;
type dovecot_t;
class file { open read execute execute_no_trans };
class dir { getattr search };
}
#= dovecot_t ==
Hi,
I see
dovecot[47939]: imap(gus...@gustik.eu)<48079>:
Error: open(/var/run/dovecot/replication-notify-fifo) failed:
No such file or directory
even though, right after:
Jul 12 13:54:41 madarka dovecot[47939]: aggregator:
Error: Client sent invalid input
when I send
echo 1 >
Aki
For replication over SSH I had to add the following module:
module selinux-dovecot-replication-ssh 1.0;
require {
type ssh_exec_t;
type ssh_home_t;
type dovecot_t;
class file { open read execute execute_no_trans };
class dir { get
On 22.6.2019 22.00, Reio Remma via dovecot wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I finally took the time and spent two days to set up replication for
> my server and now I have a question or two.
>
> I initially set noreplicate userdb field to 1 for all but a test user,
> but I could still see in the logs that all
Hello!
I finally took the time and spent two days to set up replication for my
server and now I have a question or two.
I initially set noreplicate userdb field to 1 for all but a test user,
but I could still see in the logs that all mailboxes were trying to
connect to the other server via S
We use a pair of replicating Dovecot servers.
If a user subscribes to a folder, shared by an other user, in one
replica, that does not get replicated to the other node. Subscription of
regular folders below INBOX seem to replicate correctly.
Is that a general bug, a known problem or do we need to
Hi again,
Thanks for your response William, answers inline:
On 21/07/2016 1:58 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
Reuben,
On Sunday, July 17, 2016 04:18:45 PM Reuben Farrelly wrote:
I've been seeing periodic entries in my dovecot logs like this:
dovecot[3464]: dsync-server(kaylene): Error: Co
Reuben,
On Sunday, July 17, 2016 04:18:45 PM Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> I've been seeing periodic entries in my dovecot logs like this:
>
> dovecot[3464]: dsync-server(kaylene): Error: Couldn't lock
> /home/kaylene/.dovecot-sync.lock: Timed out after 30 seconds: 3 Time(s)
> dovecot[3464]: dsync-ser
I've been seeing periodic entries in my dovecot logs like this:
dovecot[3464]: dsync-server(kaylene): Error: Couldn't lock
/home/kaylene/.dovecot-sync.lock: Timed out after 30 seconds: 3 Time(s)
dovecot[3464]: dsync-server(reuben): Error: Couldn't lock
/home/reuben/.dovecot-sync.lock: Timed out
On 03/31/2016 11:08 AM, Sergey Schwartz wrote:
> There is a workaround - limit replication scope with INBOX namespace
> only.
Sergey,
thanks for pointing that out.
I already thought of that, but this means, that i need some extra
periodic replication for the public namespaces (hence on a failover
Nobody? Should i provide more info or did i something wrong?
On 03/17/2016 06:48 AM, Georg Schuetze wrote:
> In my setup i can reproduce this issue with only one message in a shared
> folder:
> Everytime when the (new) replication client is started for the first
> time, the initial replication ta
Hi,
i have the same problem with the current dovecot version 2.2.22.
I wonder that nobody else seems to have run into this, since this thread
is quite old.
Did i miss something and does one need a special configuration for
syncing public namespaces?
Markus, do you still use your patch or did you
Hi,
since the maillist threading works only within the current month, i'll
attach the original message from 2014 from Markus Weippert.
In my setup i can reproduce this issue with only one message in a shared
folder:
Everytime when the (new) replication client is started for the first
time, the ini
> On 23 Oct 2015, at 15:51, Urban Loesch wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> last week I installed 2 servers with two dovecot nodes and replication in
> active/active mode located in different datacenters.
>
> Based on the howto from wiki "http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication"; it works
> great.
> According
Hi,
last week I installed 2 servers with two dovecot nodes and replication in
active/active mode located in different datacenters.
Based on the howto from wiki "http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication"; it works
great.
According to the wiki it is recomended to run "doveadm purge" on both systems
I'm running Dovecot 2.2.x and have a question on its replication capability.
I plan to run Dovecot in two different sites with two nodes at each site. My
question is how many replication partners can each Dovecot node have? Can I
define three "mail_replica" entries in every node so any message re
On 8/05/2015 11:04 PM, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
On 8/05/2015 6:10 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
On 05/07/2015 02:32 PM, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
On 7/05/2015 7:49 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 06 May 2015, at 13:52, Reuben Farrelly
wrote:
On 4/05/2015 11:06 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
Also is there a wa
On 8/05/2015 6:10 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
On 05/07/2015 02:32 PM, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
On 7/05/2015 7:49 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 06 May 2015, at 13:52, Reuben Farrelly
wrote:
On 4/05/2015 11:06 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
Also is there a way to restrict replication users aside
from a cr
On 05/07/2015 02:32 PM, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> On 7/05/2015 7:49 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 06 May 2015, at 13:52, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/05/2015 11:06 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
> Also is there a way to restrict replication users aside from a crude hack
> around system f
On 7/05/2015 7:49 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 06 May 2015, at 13:52, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
On 4/05/2015 11:06 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
Also is there a way to restrict replication users aside from a crude hack
around system first and last UIDs?
You can set the userdb to return an empty mail
On 7/05/2015 7:47 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 04 May 2015, at 17:11, Reuben Farrelly
wrote:
On 4/05/2015 11:06 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
Even if this doesn't end up working I figure I'll get to learn a
little more about the indexes themselves in the process.
dsyncing between servers (or in ge
On 06 May 2015, at 13:52, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
>
> On 4/05/2015 11:06 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
>>> Also is there a way to restrict replication users aside from a crude hack
>>> around system first and last UIDs?
>> You can set the userdb to return an empty mail_replica variable for users
>> y
uent updates in both
>>> directions are incremental and the bulk of the data gets moved while the
>>> device is here on my desk using rsync.
>>>
>>> I've attempted to do this using a Raspberry Pi as a remote device, but when
>>> I set it u
On 4/05/2015 11:06 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
Also is there a way to restrict replication users aside from a crude hack
around system first and last UIDs?
You can set the userdb to return an empty mail_replica variable for users you
want to exclude from replication.
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot
that the subsequent updates in both
directions are incremental and the bulk of the data gets moved while the device
is here on my desk using rsync.
I've attempted to do this using a Raspberry Pi as a remote device, but when I
set it up the dovecot replication process seems to
need to start the
this should in
> theory mean that the subsequent updates in both
> directions are incremental and the bulk of the data gets moved while the
> device is here on my desk using rsync.
>
> I've attempted to do this using a Raspberry Pi as a remote device, but when I
> set i
s moved while the device is here on my desk
using rsync.
I've attempted to do this using a Raspberry Pi as a remote device, but
when I set it up the dovecot replication process seems to need to start
the replication over from scratch even after the rsync is done. I know
this is hap
Of cource i did. Even this one does not work:
*ssl_cert = :
>
>
> Am 12.01.2015 um 13:29 schrieb Jonas Plitt:
>
>> *doveadm(exam...@example.com ): Error: Couldn't
>> initialize SSL context: Can't load CA certs from directory /etc/ssl/certs:
>> error:02001024:system library:fopen:File name too
Am 12.01.2015 um 13:29 schrieb Jonas Plitt:
*doveadm(exam...@example.com ): Error: Couldn't
initialize SSL context: Can't load CA certs from directory /etc/ssl/certs:
error:02001024:system library:fopen:File name too longdoveadm: Error:
Failed to iterate through some users*"
this is my config
Hi All,
I'm running TCP-based dsync replication on two dovecot nodes. Nowdays i
tried to enable SSL (TCPS).
I changed mail_replica prefix from tcp:* to tcps:* and added ssl=yes to the
inet_listener.
Then on running *doveadm sync* i'm getting the following message:
"
*doveadm(exam...@example.com )
Dear Dovecot-Admins,
I've set up a pair of Dovecot Servers, please find config of server one
attached.
They are configured to replicate changes over a tcp connection using port
12345, set up as described in http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication article
page.
Adding the user postboxes to replicatio
Greetings,
I've set up replication successfully on two Dovecot servers. I had fully
synced the servers but then took one offline for 2 weeks. When I restored it,
the servers synced but ended up replacing deleted emails in random people's
inboxes.
I'm using maildir.
Does anyone have any ins
we've got 2 new fileservers, they have each SSD HDDs for "new-storage"
and 7200rpm SATA HDDs on RAID 5 with 10 TB for "alt-storage"
Friends don't let friends use Raid5...
http://www.baarf.com/
(Use Raid6 or something else...)
Note, a common counter argument is that someone has "full bac
make a new system.
We desire the new system to use mdbox format ( bigger files, less I/O)
and replication through dovecot replication (active/active) instead
of drbd.
I have no experience with dovecot replication (Still on our roadmap).
We are currently using drbd on a 10Gbit dedicated link. Works
tions per day? How many concurrend connections
do you have at the same time on each server?
So we want to make a new system.
We desire the new system to use mdbox format ( bigger files, less I/O)
and replication through dovecot replication (active/active) instead of drbd.
I have no experience
On 09.10.2014 12:35, Martin Schmidt wrote:
> So we want to make a new system. We desire the new system to use
> mdbox format ( bigger files, less I/O)
Be sure to enable compression when do do that move (you'd have to do
pretty much the same migration again if you enable it later) as per
http://wik
Hello,
i have some questions about the new dovecot replication and mdbox format.
my company has currently 3 old dovecot 2.0.x fileserver/backend with ca. 120k
mailboxes and ca. 6 TB data used.
They are synchronised per drbd/corosync.
Each fileserver/backend have ca. 40k mailboxes im Maildir
Hello list,
I'm trying to achieve very simple replication, but I'm not sure if I'm
starting the good way. I have two Dovecot servers that use the same
GlusterFS storage. Of course, the indexes get corrupted eventually, even
if I apply an "NFS-like" configuration. So I'd like to synchronize my
two
Hi,
I have a failover cluster for mail server with:
Ubuntu12.04 + DRBD (for block replication) + Ext4 filesystem
+ Dovecot-2.0.19-2 with Mdbox
It works fine with ~50k accounts. My cluster design:
http://adminlinux.com.br/cluster_design.txt
I plan to test Dovecot Replication with dsync to build an
Problem solved with changing the location of the home dir, however, is
there a reliable way to do this on the "master" server with all the
production data in place?
--Asai
On 8/27/14 11:47 AM, Asai wrote:
Greetings,
I'm setting up replication and am getting this error from the server
where
The error, I presume, is that the home folder is unable to be created in
the user's directory.
--Asai
On 8/27/14 11:47 AM, Asai wrote:
Greetings,
I'm setting up replication and am getting this error from the server
where the replicated mails are being initially created:
Aug 27 11:03:53 mol
Greetings,
I'm setting up replication and am getting this error from the server
where the replicated mails are being initially created:
Aug 27 11:03:53 molecular dovecot: dsync-server(u...@domain.org): Error:
Couldn't create lock /vmail/domain.org/user/home/.dovecot-sync.lock: No
such file o
ser = vmail }}
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Minhas Listas
wrote:
> >
> > 1)
> > Aug 14 15:39:34 ceph1 dovecot: imap(account=domaintest.com): Error:
> > open(/var/run/dovecot/replication-notify-fifo) failed: Permission denied
> >
> > What is the correct
>
> 1)
> Aug 14 15:39:34 ceph1 dovecot: imap(account=domaintest.com): Error:
> open(/var/run/dovecot/replication-notify-fifo) failed: Permission denied
>
> What is the correct perms for /var/run/dovecot/replication-notify-fifo ?
> Currently:
> # ll /var/run/dovecot/repli
Hi,
I have a failover cluster for mail server with:
Ubuntu12.04 + DRBD (for block replication) + Ext4 filesystem
+ Dovecot-2.0.19-2 with Mdbox
It works fine with ~50k accounts. My cluster design:
http://adminlinux.com.br/cluster_design.txt
I plan to test Dovecot Replication with dsync to build
On 14-08-2014 16:28, Listas@Adminlinux wrote:
I have a failover cluster for mail server with:
Ubuntu12.04 + DRBD (for block replication) + Ext4 filesystem
+ Dovecot-2.0.19-2 with Mdbox
(...)
I plan to test Dovecot Replication with dsync to build an
active/active cluster with load balancing
Hi,
I have a failover cluster for mail server with:
Ubuntu12.04 + DRBD (for block replication) + Ext4 filesystem
+ Dovecot-2.0.19-2 with Mdbox
It works fine with ~50k accounts. My cluster design:
http://adminlinux.com.br/cluster_design.txt
I plan to test Dovecot Replication with dsync to
If what I wrote is a little cryptic, I am talking about using doveadm to
sync between two servers.
--Asai
On 7/17/14 8:47 AM, Asai wrote:
Greetings,
I'm working on building a redundant Dovecot server which will be
replicated with my original. I would like to know if there's any
potential p
Greetings,
I'm working on building a redundant Dovecot server which will be
replicated with my original. I would like to know if there's any
potential problems I could run into in running this for the first time.
For example, during an initial sync is it possible for the new server to
sync i
On 2014-06-17 04:50, deano-dove...@areyes.com wrote:
I'm trying to avoid switching the userdb from a nice simple static
setup to something else to enable replication. Is there anyone using
replication with a virtual user configuration ? How did you do it ?
Actually, anyone doing replication at al
I'm trying to avoid switching the userdb from a nice simple static
setup to something else to enable replication. Is there anyone using
replication with a virtual user configuration ? How did you do it ?
Actually, anyone doing replication at all - what does your config look
like ?
Thanks -
D
Is there no-one out there using replication with virtual users ? If
so how did you do it ?
I just *know* someone is going to point me to a
simple page describing how to do it ...
On 2014-06-05 09:57,
deano-dove...@areyes.com wrote:
> Ugh, stuff got mangled in formatting
below. Anyway, I've
Ugh, stuff got mangled in formatting below. Anyway, I've had no luck
with
various permutations, so it's looking like a virtual-user setup can't
make
use of replication ?
I guess what I want is for it to activate replication upon ANY
notification
of updated emails.
On 2014-06-03 11:54, deano-
Is it possible to get replication working in a virtual user setup
that uses a static userdb ? My environment is fairly simple and typical
- there's a single system user (vmail) that owns all the home dirs
(/var/mail/domain.com/user). The virtual users
(use...@domain.com:secretpassword) are kept
On 17 April 2014 14:31, Teemu Huovila wrote:
> I wish someone -with earlier experience- would answer these questions, to
> help us avoid all this fuss
> I regret that I did not spot the error in your configuration and Im sorry
> nobody else was able to answer you either. The dsync
> feature (
1 - 100 of 280 matches
Mail list logo
