On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 14:29:55 +0900 Christian Balzer wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 07:05:43 +0200 Urban Loesch wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am 03.07.2015 um 05:14 schrieb Christian Balzer:
> >
> > >
> > > 2. Here is where the fun starts.
> > > Each IMAP session that gets proxied to the real mailbox se
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 07:05:43 +0200 Urban Loesch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 03.07.2015 um 05:14 schrieb Christian Balzer:
>
> >
> > 2. Here is where the fun starts.
> > Each IMAP session that gets proxied to the real mailbox server needs a
> > port for the outgoing connection.
> > So to support 2 millio
Hi,
Am 03.07.2015 um 05:14 schrieb Christian Balzer:
2. Here is where the fun starts.
Each IMAP session that gets proxied to the real mailbox server needs a
port for the outgoing connection.
So to support 2 million sessions we need 40 IP addresses here. Ouch.
And from a brief test having multi
Hello,
first post in 3 years, kinda shows how painless Dovecot is. ^o^
Also this isn't really a dovecot issue, alas it's involved and since there
are some large scale implementations of it I hope somebody here has some
insights I might have missed.
Currently we're running this setup:
1. LVS (D
