On 02.11.2016 19:54, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2016-11-02, Aki Tuomi wrote:
If the standard way works, I am happy to include the original patch I
sent, amended so that it checks for presence of LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER.
If they keep this promise, then we should have no worries about things
br
On 2016-11-02, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> If the standard way works, I am happy to include the original patch I
> sent, amended so that it checks for presence of LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER.
> If they keep this promise, then we should have no worries about things
> breaking up.
Diff below is what I've add
>>> EVP_PKEY_get0_EC_KEY
>>> EVP_PKEY_get0_RSA
>>> OBJ_length
>>> EVP_MD_CTX_new
>>> EVP_MD_CTX_free
>>>
>>> The result of calling a non-existent function is a runtime error,
>>> and we do not want that on production servers.
lling a non-existent function is a runtime error,
and we do not want that on production servers.
There are additional problems. I recommend compiling with
clang-llvm
3.9.0
to see them all.
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: v2.2.26.0 released
Local Time: 1 November 2016 7:
of calling a non-existent function is a runtime error,
and we do not want that on production servers.
There are additional problems. I recommend compiling with clang-llvm
3.9.0
to see them all.
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: v2.2.26.0 released
Local Time: 1 November
> officially supported one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aki
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02.11.2016 12:34, Ruga wrote:
>>>>>> dovecot 2.2.26.0 uses the following functions, which are not
>>>>>> available on libressl 2.4.3:
>>>>&
_CTX_new
EVP_MD_CTX_free
The result of calling a non-existent function is a runtime error,
and we do not want that on production servers.
There are additional problems. I recommend compiling with clang-llvm
3.9.0
to see them all.
Original Message
Subject: Re: v2.2.26.0
hem all.
Original Message
Subject: Re: v2.2.26.0 released
Local Time: 1 November 2016 7:30 PM
UTC Time: 1 November 2016 18:30
From: aki.tu...@dovecot.fi
To: Dovecot Mailing List , Ruga
OpenSSL v1.0.1 is enough.
Aki
On November 1, 2016 at 7:46 PM Ruga wrote:
Hello,
on production servers.
There are additional problems. I recommend compiling with clang-llvm
3.9.0
to see them all.
Original Message
Subject: Re: v2.2.26.0 released
Local Time: 1 November 2016 7:30 PM
UTC Time: 1 November 2016 18:30
From: aki.tu...@dovecot.fi
To: Dove
g a non-existent function is a runtime error,
and we do not want that on production servers.
There are additional problems. I recommend compiling with clang-llvm
3.9.0
to see them all.
Original Message
Subject: Re: v2.2.26.0 released
Local Time: 1 November 2016 7:30
new
EVP_MD_CTX_free
The result of calling a non-existent function is a runtime error,
and we do not want that on production servers.
There are additional problems. I recommend compiling with clang-llvm
3.9.0
to see them all.
Original Message
Subject: Re: v2.2.26.0 relea
ers.
There are additional problems. I recommend compiling with clang-llvm 3.9.0
to see them all.
Original Message
Subject: Re: v2.2.26.0 released
Local Time: 1 November 2016 7:30 PM
UTC Time: 1 November 2016 18:30
From: aki.tu...@dovecot.fi
To: Dovecot Mailing List , R
production servers.
There are additional problems. I recommend compiling with clang-llvm 3.9.0
to see them all.
Original Message
Subject: Re: v2.2.26.0 released
Local Time: 1 November 2016 7:30 PM
UTC Time: 1 November 2016 18:30
From: aki.tu...@dovecot.fi
To: Dovecot
I can confirm that LibreSSL 2.4.3 works just fine for building 2.2.26.0
On 11/01/2016 09:25 PM, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
I don't believe that is the case.
I have 2.2.26.0 and -git building and running on multiple systems now
(two of which are Gentoo boxes) with LibreSSL-2.5 - and these systems do
I don't believe that is the case.
I have 2.2.26.0 and -git building and running on multiple systems now
(two of which are Gentoo boxes) with LibreSSL-2.5 - and these systems do
not have OpenSSL installed. Are you running an old version of LibreSSL
perhaps?
I *think* LibreSSL-2.4 was OK as w
OpenSSL v1.0.1 is enough.
Aki
> On November 1, 2016 at 7:46 PM Ruga wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> We cannot upgrade from 2.2.24, because we use libressl and the newer
> dovecot versions demand openssl v1.1.
>
> Please add the new library requirement to the INSTALL file.
>
> All the best.
>
>
>
Hello,
We cannot upgrade from 2.2.24, because we use libressl and the newer
dovecot versions demand openssl v1.1.
Please add the new library requirement to the INSTALL file.
All the best.
Original Message
Subject: v2.2.26.0 released
Local Time: 28 October 2016 6:51 PM
17 matches
Mail list logo
