Re: To field was not correct indexed by FTS

2020-07-26 Thread TACHIBANA Masashi
Hi, Thank you Jeff san. It seems to be able to work fine in IMAP, without FTS. But I hope FTS to find addresses. And I reported this to the developers of email solutions which adding such MIMEd display name. But for older mails or another email softwares, I hope this problems to be solved in Dov

Re: To field was not correct indexed by FTS

2020-07-21 Thread Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 08:18:21 +0900, TACHIBANA Masashi wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for your reply. > > I hope this bug to be fixed soon. :) It is a tricky one because as far as I can tell, the From header is invalid. So, we have to figure out the best way to handle such input. The input is in

Re: To field was not correct indexed by FTS

2020-07-20 Thread TACHIBANA Masashi
Hi, Thank you for your reply. I hope this bug to be fixed soon. :) Thank you. Tachibana - Original Message - > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:43:12 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 20:24:13 +0900, TACHIBANA Masashi wrote: > ... > > Thanks for the report. I repro

Re: To field was not correct indexed by FTS

2020-07-20 Thread Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:43:12 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 20:24:13 +0900, TACHIBANA Masashi wrote: ... > Thanks for the report. I reproduced it locally, but I'm not sure what is > causing it yet. Alright, it is actually a parsing bug. The problem seems to be whe

Re: To field was not correct indexed by FTS

2020-07-20 Thread Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 20:24:13 +0900, TACHIBANA Masashi wrote: > Hi, > > I'm Tachibana. > Additionally, I found below: > > dovecot/src/plugins/fts/fts-build-mail.c: > > 187 i_debug("@ befor address > parse:%s",hdr->full_value); > 188 > 189 addr

Re: To field was not correct indexed by FTS

2020-07-20 Thread TACHIBANA Masashi
Hi, I'm Tachibana. Additionally, I found below: dovecot/src/plugins/fts/fts-build-mail.c: 187 i_debug("@ befor address parse:%s",hdr->full_value); 188 189 addr = message_address_parse(pool_datastack_create(), 190