On 7/29/14, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> Nick Edwards wrote:
>> On 7/26/14, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> > Am 25.07.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Eduardo Ramos:
>> >> I did not understand what the advantage of use dovecot LMTP with
>> >> director too.
>> >
>> > in "very short" words...
>> > with nfs ,the direc
Nick Edwards wrote:
> On 7/26/14, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> > Am 25.07.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Eduardo Ramos:
> >> I did not understand what the advantage of use dovecot LMTP with
> >> director too.
> >
> > in "very short" words...
> > with nfs ,the director should avoid concurrent events
> > which
On 24 Jul 2014, at 20:09, Nathan Schultheiss wrote:
> When I go on Roundcube with a mailbox who I've 96000 in the INBOX "cur"
> folder, the first time I need 1 minutes waiting.
> The second time it's a little more quick 10 seconds... But when I go back
> again (after a few hours) it's slow agai
Am 28.07.2014 um 13:09 schrieb Nick Edwards:
> On 7/26/14, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 25.07.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Eduardo Ramos:
>>> I did not understand what the advantage of use dovecot LMTP with
>>> director too.
>>
>> in "very short" words...
>> with nfs ,the director should avoid concurre
On 7/26/14, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 25.07.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Eduardo Ramos:
>> I did not understand what the advantage of use dovecot LMTP with
>> director too.
>
> in "very short" words...
> with nfs ,the director should avoid concurrent events
> which may happen with lmtp too, depending
Am 25.07.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Eduardo Ramos:
> I did not understand what the advantage of use dovecot LMTP with
> director too.
in "very short" words...
with nfs ,the director should avoid concurrent events
which may happen with lmtp too, depending to multiple server setup
Best Regards
MfG Rober
Hi Richard,
I think its better balance with a router too. Is there any problem with
use postfix+amavis in the front-end? I did not understand what the
advantage of use dovecot LMTP with director too.
On 07/25/2014 01:58 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 25/07/14 15:30, Eduardo Ramos wrote:
Hi R
On 25/07/14 15:30, Eduardo Ramos wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> In fact I thought it a little confusing. I had some bad experience with
> DNS RR when one of my IMAP server got down. Clients continued trying
> connect to broken server and it caused some problems. But when
> everything is ok, it works wel
Hi Richard,
In fact I thought it a little confusing. I had some bad experience with
DNS RR when one of my IMAP server got down. Clients continued trying
connect to broken server and it caused some problems. But when
everything is ok, it works well.
I drew a diagram with my idea. What do you
On 25/07/14 09:12, Richard Hector wrote:
Rather than trying to draw increasingly complex diagrams in ASCII, I've
put some here (without the LVS layer):
https://walnut.gen.nz/mail-architectures.png
I've come up with a revised plan - I think we can do without LVS; SMTP
should just work with mult
On 25/07/14 00:01, Eduardo Ramos wrote:
You can use one or more instances of Dovecot on the same machine, as you
can see here (http://wiki2.dovecot.org/RunningDovecot) "Running Multiple
Invocations of Dovecot".
The problem with DNS round-robind is that if you server goes down, DNS
continues reso
On 7/24/2014 12:09 PM, Nathan Schultheiss wrote:
...
> |> Mail it's stored in MailDir format "mail_location = maildir:%h"
>
> When I go on Roundcube with a mailbox who I've 96000 in the INBOX "cur"
> folder, the first time I need 1 minutes waiting.
> The second time it's a little more quick 1
hink my config (NFS mount/options) it's just a little poor and that's
the reason why it's slow.
Bests Regards,
Nathan
- Mail original -
De: "Eduardo Ramos"
À: dovecot@dovecot.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 24 Juillet 2014 19:27:50
Objet: Re: Multiple servers and NFS
Hi Nathan
e/vmail,
that work for 1 but not for the second, and I receive many error.
I think Equallogic don't like that 2 Virtual Server wrote on the same time to
the same ISCSI session.
Freundliche Grüße aus Frankreich,
Nathan
- Mail original -
De: "Patrick Westenberg"
À: dove
Nathan Schultheiss schrieb:
My config:
Dell Equallogic
|-> VMWare ESXI (iscsi mount in VMware with VMWare VMFS 5 format 4To)
|--> Mounted as slave disk on a VM Ubuntu and exported with this options
"(rw,no_subtree_check,all_squash,anonuid=1000,anongid=1000,async)" and formated as
ReiserFS (I'
good with Windows server, I'm not a
good man Google, Microsoft, I know it's devil for every linux sysadmin :)
Thanks,
Nathan
- Mail original -
De: "Eduardo Ramos"
À: dovecot@dovecot.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 24 Juillet 2014 14:01:33
Objet: Re: Multiple servers and NFS
Hi Richar
really success for have a fast NFS, I don't know
if the problem it's VMWARE or if the problem it's just my NFS options.
I'm not pettry good with linux, I'm most good with Windows server, I'm not a
good man Google, Microsoft, I know it's devil for every linux
Hi Richard,
You can use one or more instances of Dovecot on the same machine, as you
can see here (http://wiki2.dovecot.org/RunningDovecot) "Running Multiple
Invocations of Dovecot".
The problem with DNS round-robind is that if you server goes down, DNS
continues resolving for it. I would re
Richard Hector wrote:
> But with the recommendation to use the Director for both IMAP/POP3 and LMTP
> - that starts to sound like I need a whole bunch more servers to run
> Directors and proxies, and even then it might not be a good idea to have
> different servers running lmtp and imap/pop.
Runni
19 matches
Mail list logo
