El Friday 24 October 2014, deano-dove...@areyes.com escribió:
> On 2014-10-23 12:19, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
> What kind of VPS are you using ? I'm in a similar boat to you, running
> my own domain(s) and email, and have built the mail system on a set of 3
> VPS', two 6G ram that cost $7/mo and one
On 2014-10-23 12:19, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
That most of my mail comes from 100% assured not spam sources: mailing
lists
that are already filtered or rss2email (the second probably can be
skipped
easily because it comes locally). I only have a small VPS, so I'm
trying to
save some resources if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24-10-14 11:18, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>
>
> On 24-10-14 01:35, Peter Chiochetti wrote:
>> Am 2014-10-23 um 17:11 schrieb Alejandro Exojo:
>>>
>>> I moved to IMAP and my filters are server side with sieve, but
>>> I don't have spam filtering yet.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24-10-14 01:35, Peter Chiochetti wrote:
> Am 2014-10-23 um 17:11 schrieb Alejandro Exojo:
>>
>> I moved to IMAP and my filters are server side with sieve, but I
>> don't have spam filtering yet.
>
> I understand, that you do not want spamassas
Am 2014-10-23 um 17:11 schrieb Alejandro Exojo:
I moved to IMAP and my filters are server side with sieve, but I don't have
spam filtering yet.
I understand, that you do not want spamassassin (SA) to check lots of
messages that are clean anyways.
If you can call SA from sieve, as a condtion
Am 23.10.2014 um 18:19 schrieb Alejandro Exojo:
> El Thursday 23 October 2014, Robert Schetterer escribió:
>> i dont get what your problem is exactly
>> but looks like you wanna pre sort mail about other stuff ( i.e. sender
>> ) and doing spam sort at last, should be no problem with a sieve user
>
El Thursday 23 October 2014, Robert Schetterer escribió:
> i dont get what your problem is exactly
> but looks like you wanna pre sort mail about other stuff ( i.e. sender
> ) and doing spam sort at last, should be no problem with a sieve user
> rule if spam score is allready in the mail ( flagged
Am 23.10.2014 um 17:11 schrieb Alejandro Exojo:
> Hi.
>
> TL/DR version:
>
> Is it advisable to invoke an spam checker from the sieve script, and then,
> once the message is filtered, decide if should be moved to a certain spam
> folder?
why not use i.e spamass milter with postfix to flag, and
