Bernd Petrovitsch skrev den 2019-12-12 00:44:
Reply-to munging is considered harmful - please fix that.
And thunderbird shows in the "From", "Recipient", "Correspondents" and
"Sender[@]" column only "dovecot@dovecot.org" which neither helpful nor
correct.
it is solved imho
ARC-Authentication-
Hi all!
On 11/12/2019 19:16, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote:
> Atomia via dovecot skrev den 2019-12-11 17:37:
[...]
> wonderfull example on why mailman sooks on change sender from ://
Reply-to munging is considered harmful - please fix that.
And thunderbird shows in the "From", "Recipient", "Cor
Atomia via dovecot skrev den 2019-12-11 17:37:
Hi Claudio Corvino via dovecot,
wonderfull example on why mailman sooks on change sender from ://
this mail here should imho be very private not posted to maillists
stop breaking dkim please
Hi Claudio Corvino via dovecot, We have received your request and a ticket
has been created with Ticket ID - 22073. A support representative will be
reviewing your request and will contact you shortly.
To view the status of the ticket or add comments, please visitÂ
https://support.ato
Trying to figure out how to implement an X-Loop header to my
configuration, any ideas?
On 29/11/19 10:00, Claudio Corvino via dovecot wrote:
X-Loop header could be what I was looking for, thanks!
On 28/11/19 22:03, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
On 28 Nov 2019, at 09:44, Claudio Corvino
wrote:
J
X-Loop header could be what I was looking for, thanks!
On 28/11/19 22:03, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
On 28 Nov 2019, at 09:44, Claudio Corvino wrote:
Just one problem remaining: the e-mail that have l...@domain.tld in BCC could
not be intercepted by the sieve filter as in the header is not pr
On 28 Nov 2019, at 09:44, Claudio Corvino wrote:
> Just one problem remaining: the e-mail that have l...@domain.tld in BCC could
> not be intercepted by the sieve filter as in the header is not present any
> reference to l...@domain.tld; am I missing something or this cannot be fixed?
The norma
Hi,
I think that the test "if not duplicate" could not work for our case, as
the out of office should answer everytime, we only wants the redirect to
not be sent as a duplicate for the users of the alias LIST.
In other words we would like:
1) To redirect the e-mail directed to a single user
> The "true" check is used to enable the out of office rule, otherwise we use
> "if false # true" to disable it.
Thanks!
The "duplicate" test was removed because not working in this particular
case, I already read the RFC but I didn't find anything useful for our case.
I'll try replacing `if true` with `if not duplicate` into sieve script
and I'll post back the result.
The "true" check is used to enable the out
> Corvino via dovecot :
>
> # rule:[Outofoffice]
> if true
Is this true check used to toggle the vacation responder by
commenting/uncommenting the line above?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019, at 5:13 AM, Claudio Corvino via dovecot wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> we have a duplicate e-mail problem with Dovecot 2.2.13 (LMTP as MDA) on
> a Debian 8 server.
>
> Our users are on external LDAP.
>
> We just need to setup a vacation responder (with Sieve) for our
> emp
On 26 Nov 2019, at 03:13, Claudio Corvino wrote:
>
Please do not do this.
--
IT DOES NOT SUCK TO BE YOU Bart chalkboard Ep. AABF13
13 matches
Mail list logo
