On 21/03/17 07:03, Joseph Tam wrote:
Sami Ketola writes:
Can anyone with Solr installed confirm/refute this: does installing
Solr keep iOS clients from roofing the connection count?
I doubt it, but since IMAP SEARCH goes all the way down to the backends
mail_max_userip_connections can be use
Sami Ketola writes:
Can anyone with Solr installed confirm/refute this: does installing
Solr keep iOS clients from roofing the connection count?
I doubt it, but since IMAP SEARCH goes all the way down to the backends
mail_max_userip_connections can be used to limit the number of
connections.
> On 16 Mar 2017, at 22.23, Joseph Tam wrote:
>
> Can anyone with Solr installed confirm/refute this: does installing
> Solr keep iOS clients from roofing the connection count?
I doubt it, but since IMAP SEARCH goes all the way down to the backends
mail_max_userip_connections
can be used to
Adi Pircalabu writes:
For us it is, we're periodically getting hammered by iOS devices that
try to open 300+ simultaneous IMAP connections for a single user from
the same IP, while the average hovers usually below 50 for the busier
mailboxes with many folders.
Oh yeah, I've seen this. I think
Hi,
It would be quite hard to enforce a limit at the proxy level since the proxies
do not share any information. Currently I do not know any way of enforcing a
limit at the proxies already.
Sami
> On 16 Mar 2017, at 7.14, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
>
> Thanks,
>
> I thought this might be the case
On 16/03/17 11:03, Timo Sirainen wrote:
No plans to support enforcing at proxy level. One problem here is that there
are no guarantees that the connections even end up in the same proxies,
although I guess if your load balancer does IP stickiness that could work well
enough.
With or withou
On 16 Mar 2017, at 0.14, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
>
> I thought this might be the case. Is there any solution to enforce this on
> the proxy? If not, will a feature request be considered anytime soon? I see
> the proxies as the first line of defense against IMAP "abuse" and I think
> it's consiste
Thanks,
I thought this might be the case. Is there any solution to enforce this
on the proxy? If not, will a feature request be considered anytime soon?
I see the proxies as the first line of defense against IMAP "abuse" and
I think it's consistent having the same configurable option available
Hi,
mail_max_userip_connections is only enforced at the backend level. The setting
has no effect on proxy. If you want to force the limit then you can only do it
in the backend.
Sami
> On 9 Mar 2017, at 12.05, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
>
> Quick follow-up: updated the proxies to 2.2.28, but I sti
Quick follow-up: updated the proxies to 2.2.28, but I still couldn't
find a way to limit the inbound IMAP connections per IP & username. I
know "mail_max_userip_connections" limit works for the mail stores, but
it doesn't seem to have any effect on the proxies. I'm using a mix of
Dovecot & Cour
10 matches
Mail list logo
